research-article

Virtual Reality at a Prehistoric Museum: Exploring the Influence of System Quality and Personality on User Intentions

Authors:

Eko Harry Pratisto,

Vidyasagar PotdarAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, Volume 16, Issue 2

Article No.: 33, Pages 1 - 19

https://doi.org/10.1145/3585425

Published: 24 June 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Virtual Reality (VR) promises many benefits for the tourism industry. However, a review of tourism-related VR research shows that the roles of system quality and user personality remain largely unexplored. This study examines the causal relation underlying VR quality (information quality, interactivity, and visual attractiveness) and the user's personality (openness to experience, conscientiousness, and social influence) in conjunction with usability, attitude, and behavioural intention. We collected user data from a VR tourism experience of the Sangiran museum at Surakarta, Indonesia using a Head Mounted Device VR. The Sangiran museum is an archaeological excavation site recognised as a world heritage site by UNESCO. Two hundred eighteen valid responses were analysed using Structural Equation Modelling. The result suggests that only visual attractiveness positively impacts usability from a VR quality perspective, while openness to experience and social influence show significant positive evidence of attitude. These findings are discussed based on the practical and theoretical implications, including future research opportunities into VR tourism.

References

[1]

Steve Bryson. 2020. Virtual reality: Definition and requirements. Retrieved May 12, 2021 from https://www.nas.nasa.gov/Software/VWT/vr.html.

[2]

Aliane Loureiro Krassmann, Alex Eder da Rocha Mazzuco, Miguel Melo, Maximino Bessa, and Magda Bercht. 2020. Usability and sense of presence in virtual worlds for distance education: A case study with virtual reality experts. In 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education. 155–162. DOI:

[3]

Yoonhyuk Jung. 2008. Influence of sense of presence on intention to participate in a virtual community. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008). Waikoloa. IEEE, 325–325. DOI:

Digital Library

[4]

Eugene Ch'ng, Yue Li, Shengdan Cai, and Fui-Theng Leow. 2020. The effects of VR environments on the acceptance, experience, and expectations of cultural heritage learning. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 13, 1. DOI:

Digital Library

[5]

Mafkereseb K. Bekele, Roberto Pierdicca, Emanuele Frontoni, Eva S. Malinverni, and James Gain. 2018. A survey of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality for cultural heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 11, 2 (2008), 1–36. DOI:

Digital Library

[6]

United Nations World Tourism Organization. 2019. International Tourism Highlights, 2019 edition. (2019). Retrieved June 27, 2021 from https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/abs/10.18111/9789284421152.

[7]

Tourism Research Australia. 2020. International visitor survey results December 2020. Retrieved June 17, 2021 from https://www.tra.gov.au/data-and-research/reports/international-visitor-survey-results-december-2020/international-visitor-survey-results-december-2020.

[8]

Yu Chih Huang, Kenneth F. Backman, Sheila J. Backman, and Lan Lan Chang. 2016. Exploring the implications of virtual reality technology in tourism marketing: An integrated research framework. International Journal of Tourism Research 18, 2 (2016), 116–128. DOI:

[9]

Paul Williams and J. S. Perry Hobson. 1995. Virtual reality and tourism: Fact or fantasy? Tourism Management 16, 6 (1995), 423–427. DOI:

[10]

Alistair Williams. 2006. Tourism and hospitality marketing: Fantasy, feeling and fun. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 18, 6 (2006), 482–495. DOI:

[11]

Roger Cheong. 1995. The virtual threat to travel and tourism. Tourism Management 16, 6 (1995), 417–422. DOI:

[12]

Silvia Sussmann and Hugo Vanhegan. 2000. Virtual reality and the tourism product: Substitution or complement? In European Conference on Information Systems. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2000/117.

[13]

Eko Harry Pratisto, Nik Thompson, and Vidyasagar Potdar. 2022. Immersive technologies for tourism: A systematic review. Information Technology & Tourism 24, 2 (2022), 181–219. DOI:

[14]

Daniel A. Guttentag. 2010. Virtual reality: Applications and implications for tourism. Tourism Management 31, 5 (2010), 637–651. DOI:

[15]

J. S. Perry Hobson and A. Paul Williams. 1995. Virtual reality: A new horizon for the tourism industry. Journal of Vacation Marketing 1, 2 (1995), 124–135. DOI:

[16]

Iis P. Tussyadiah, Dan Wang, Timothy H. Jung, and Mandy C. Tom Dieck. 2018. Virtual reality, presence, and attitude change: Empirical evidence from tourism. Tourism Management 66 (2018), 140–154. DOI:

[17]

Kai Israel, Christopher Zerres, and Dieter K. Tscheulin. 2019. Presenting hotels in virtual reality: Does it influence the booking intention? Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology 10, 3 (2019), 443–463. DOI:

[18]

Wei Wei, Ruoxi Qi, and Lu Zhang. 2019. Effects of virtual reality on theme park visitors' experience and behaviors: A presence perspective. Tourism Management 71 (2019), 282–293. DOI:

[19]

Tao Li and Yun Chen. 2019. Will virtual reality be a double-edged sword? Exploring the moderation effects of the expected enjoyment of a destination on travel intention. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 12 (2019), 15–26. DOI:

[20]

Hyunae Lee, Timothy Hyungsoo Jung, M. Claudia Tom Dieck, and Namho Chung. 2019. Experiencing immersive virtual reality in museums. Information & Management 57, 5 (2019), DOI:

[21]

Myung Ja Kim, Choong-Ki Lee, and Timothy Jung. 2020. Exploring consumer behavior in virtual reality tourism using an extended stimulus-organism-response model. Journal of Travel Research 59, 1 (2020), 69–89. DOI:

[22]

Elmedin Selmanović et al. 2020. Improving accessibility to intangible cultural heritage preservation using virtual reality. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 13, 2 (2020), Article 13. DOI:

Digital Library

[23]

Luisa Errichiello, Roberto Micera, Marcello Atzeni, and Giacomo Del Chiappa. 2019. Exploring the implications of wearable virtual reality technology for museum visitors' experience: A cluster analysis. International Journal of Tourism Research 21, 5 (2019), 590–605. DOI:

[24]

Carlos Flavián, Sergio Ibáñez-Sánchez, and Carlos Orús. 2019. Integrating virtual reality devices into the body: Effects of technological embodiment on customer engagement and behavioral intentions toward the destination. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 36, 7 (2019), 847–863. DOI:

[25]

Martin Fishbein and Icek Ajzen. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Canada.

[26]

Henna Mäkinen, Elina Haavisto, Sara Havola, and Jaana-Maija Koivisto. 2020. User experiences of virtual reality technologies for healthcare in learning: An integrative review. Behaviour & Information Technology (2020), 1–17. DOI:

[27]

International Organization for Standardization. 2018. Ergonomics of human-system interaction – part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts. ISO 9241-11:2018. https://www.iso.org/standard/63500.html.

[28]

Patrick W. Jordan. 2002. An Introduction to Usability. CRC Press, Florida.

[29]

John Brooke. 1996. SUS-a quick and dirty usability scale. In Usability Evaluation in Industry, Patrick W. Jordan, Bruce Thomas, Bernard A. Weerdmeester, and Ian L. McClelland (Eds.). Taylor & Francis Ltd, London, 189–194. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781498710411-35/sus-quick-dirty-usability-scale-john-brooke.

[30]

James E. Bailey and Sammy W. Pearson. 1983. Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science 29, 5 (1983), 530. DOI:

Digital Library

[31]

Mo A. Mahmood and Jeanette N. Medewitz. 1985. Impact of design methods on decision support systems success: An empirical assessment. Information & Management 9, 3 (1985), 137–151. DOI:

Digital Library

[32]

Ananth Srinivasan. 1985. Alternative measures of system effectiveness: Associations and implications. MIS Quarterly 9, 3 (1985), 243–253. DOI:

Digital Library

[33]

Jiabao Lin, Shuang Xiao, and Yuzhi Cao. 2010. Predicting and explaining the adoption of mobile banking. In Annual Conference of China Institute of Communications. SCI Guangzhou, 421–424.

[34]

Haitham Alshibly. 2011. An extended TAM model to evaluate user's acceptance of electronic cheque clearing systems at Jordanian commercial banks. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 5 (2011), 147–156. http://www.ajbasweb.com/old/ajbas/2011/147-156.pdf.

[35]

Kao Rui-Hsin and Chen-Tai Lin. 2018. The usage intention of e-learning for police education and training. Policing: An International Journal 41, 1 (2018), 98–112. DOI:

[36]

Ehsan Abedi, Davood Ghorbanzadeh, and Atena Rahehagh. 2019. Influence of eWOM information on consumers’ behavioral intentions in mobile social networks: Evidence of Iran. Journal of Advances in Management Research 17, 1 (2019), 84–109. DOI:

[37]

Chien-Wen Chen and Serhan Demirci. 2019. Factors affecting mobile shoppers’ continuation intention of coffee shop online store: A perspective on consumer tolerance. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies 10, 2 (2019), 203–238. DOI:

[38]

Ida Tang Xin En. 2020. Assessing Factors Affecting Purchase Intention of Mobile Application Users. PhD diss. Swinburne University of Technology Sarawak Campus. Retrieved from https://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/file/4dcda3e8-ae82-4c30-91fa-3f7423c85147/1/ida_tang_thesis.pdf.

[39]

Chiao-Chen Chang. 2013. Exploring the determinants of e-learning systems continuance intention in academic libraries. Library Management 34, 1/2 (2013), 40–55. DOI:

[40]

Stephan Poelmans and Patrick Wessa. 2015. A constructivist approach in a blended e-learning environment for statistics. Interactive Learning Environments 23, 3 (2015), 385–401. DOI:

[41]

Grace J. Johnson, Gordon C. Bruner II, and Anand Kumar. 2006. Interactivity and its facets revisited: Theory and empirical test. Journal of Advertising 35, 4 (2006), 35–52. DOI:

[42]

Dongxiao Gu, Xuejie Yang, Xingguo Li, Hemant K. Jain, and Changyong Liang. 2018. Understanding the role of mobile internet-based health services on patient satisfaction and word-of-mouth. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15, 9 (1972). DOI:

[43]

Hans van der Heijden. 2003. Factors influencing the usage of websites: The case of a generic portal in the Netherlands. Information & Management 40, 6 (2003), 541–549. DOI:

Digital Library

[44]

Namho Chung, Heejeong Han, and Youhee Joun. 2015. Tourists’ intention to visit a destination: The role of augmented reality (AR) application for a heritage site. Computers in Human Behavior 50 (2015), 588–599. DOI:

Digital Library

[45]

Amir Hossein Ghapanchi, Afrooz Purarjomandlangrudi, Alasdair McAndrew, and Yuan Miao. 2020. Investigating the impact of space design, visual attractiveness and perceived instructor presence on student adoption of learning management systems. Education and Information Technologies 25, 6 (2020), 5053–5066. DOI:

Digital Library

[46]

Fred D. Davis, Richard P. Bagozzi, and Paul R. Warshaw. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35, 8 (1989), 982–1003. DOI:

Digital Library

[47]

Jianfeng Wang and Sylvain Senecal. 2007. Measuring perceived website usability. Journal of Internet Commerce 6, 4 (2007), 97–112. DOI:

[48]

Quyen P. T. Phan and Michal Pilík. 2018. The relationship between website design and positive eWOM intention: Testing mediator and moderator effect. Journal of Business Economics and Management 19, 2 (2018), 382–398. DOI:

[49]

Robert R. McCrae and Oliver P. John. 1992. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality 60, 2 (1992), 175–215. DOI:

[50]

Dana Gossman. 2014. Impact of Social Networking Site Usage on Fashion Consumers Behavioral Intention. Master's thesis. California State University, Northridge. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/47429d32m.

[51]

Ajeet Sharma. 2016. The Big Five personality factors and attitude toward the ad of consumers in India. Journal of Marketing & Communication, 26–44. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=bsu&AN=135117422&site=ehost-live.

[52]

Murray R. Barrick and Michael K. Mount. 1991. The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 44, 1 (1991), 1–26. DOI:

[53]

Yue Zhang, Song Wu, and Muhammad Imran Rasheed. 2020. Conscientiousness and smartphone recycling intention: The moderating effect of risk perception. Waste Management 101 (2020), 116–125. DOI:

[54]

Yan Piaw Chua and Yee Pei Chua. 2017. Do computer-mediated communication skill, knowledge and motivation mediate the relationships between personality traits and attitude toward Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior 70 (2017), 51–59. DOI:

Digital Library

[55]

Noah Friedkin and Eugene Johnsen. 1999. Social influence networks and opinion change. In Advances in Group Process, JAI Press Inc. (1999), 1–29. DOI:

[56]

Icek Ajzen. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 2 (1991), 179–211. DOI:

[57]

Jaewon Choi, Hong Joo Lee, Farhana Sajjad, and Habin Lee. 2014. The influence of national culture on the attitude towards mobile recommender systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 86 (2014), 65–79. DOI:

[58]

Nripendra P. Rana, Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Michael D. Williams, and Vishanth Weerakkody. 2016. Adoption of online public grievance redressal system in India. Computers in Human Behavior 59 (2016), 265–282. DOI:

Digital Library

[59]

Roshny Unnikrishnan and Lakshmi Jagannathan. 2017. Adoption of mobile payment services in Bangalore urban-a structural equation modelling based approach. Journal of Contemporary Research in Management 12, 4 (2017), 1–19. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2070392023.

[60]

Dhoha AlSaleh and Ramendra Thakur. 2019. Impact of cognition, affect, and social factors on technology adoption. International Journal of Technology Marketing 13, 2 (2019), 178–200. DOI:

[61]

Maryam Altalhi. 2020. Toward a model for acceptance of MOOCs in higher education: The modified UTAUT model for Saudi Arabia. Education and Information Technologies 26 (2020), 1589–1605. DOI:

Digital Library

[62]

Arash Vahdat, Ali Alizadeh, Sara Quach, and Nicolas Hamelin. 2020. Would you like to shop via mobile app technology? The technology acceptance model, social factors and purchase intention. Australasian Marketing Journal (2020), DOI:

[63]

Dong-Hee Shin. 2009. Towards an understanding of the consumer acceptance of mobile wallet. Computers in Human Behavior 25, 6 (2009), 1343–1354. DOI:

Digital Library

[64]

Mohammad Ismail and Razli Che Razak. 2011. The determinant factors influencing young consumers acceptance of mobile marketing in Malaysia. African Journal of Business Management 5, 32 (2011), 12531–12542. https://academicjournals.org/journal/AJBM/article-abstract/B2B235220772.

[65]

Iviane Ramos-de-Luna, Francisco Montoro-Ríos, and Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas. 2016. Determinants of the intention to use NFC technology as a payment system: An acceptance model approach. Information Systems and e-Business Management 14, 2 (2016), 293–314. DOI:

Digital Library

[66]

Aaron M. French. 2017. Let's meet offline: A mixed-methods approach exploring new trends in social networking. Information Technology & People 30, 4 (2017), 946–968. DOI:

[67]

Dharun Lingam Kasilingam. 2020. Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping. Technology in Society 62 (2020), DOI:

[68]

Yang W. Lee, Diane M. Strong, Beverly K. Kahn, and Richard Y. Wang. 2002. AIMQ: A methodology for information quality assessment. Information & Management 40, 2 (2020), 133–146. DOI:

Digital Library

[69]

Yuping Liu. 2003. Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of websites. Journal of Advertising Research 43, 2 (2003), 207–216. DOI:

[70]

Oliver P. John and Sanjay Srivastava. 1999. The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, Lawrence A. Pervin and Oliver P. John. (Eds.). Guilford Press, United States, 102–138.

[71]

Guat-Tham See and Yen-Nee Goh. 2019. Tourists' intention to visit heritage hotels at George Town World Heritage Site. Journal of Heritage Tourism 14, 1 (2019), 1–16. DOI:

[72]

Viswanath Venkatesh, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, and Fred D. Davis. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27, 3 (2003), 425–478. DOI:

Digital Library

[73]

Derrick A. Bennett. 2001. How can I deal with missing data in my study? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 25, 5 (2001), 464–469. DOI:

[74]

James Gaskin. 2016. Data screening. Retrieved November 10, 2020 from http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com/index.php?title=Data_screening.

[75]

V. A. Sposito, M. L. Hand, and Bradley Skarpness. 1983. On the efficiency of using the sample kurtosis in selecting optimal Lp estimators. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 12, 3 (1983), 265–272. DOI:

[76]

Rex B. Kline. 2015. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed). The Guilford Publications, New York.

[77]

Barbara M. Byrne. 2016. Structural Equation Modeling with Amos: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (3rd ed). Routledge, New York.

[78]

Leslie Hayduk, Greta Cummings, Kwame Boadu, Hannah Pazderka-Robinson, and Shelley Boulianne. 2007. Testing! Testing! One, two, three-testing the theory in structural equation models! Personality and Individual Differences 42, 5 (2007), 841–850. DOI:

[79]

Joseph F. Hair Jr., William C. Black, Barry J. Babin, and Rolph E. Anderson. 2014. Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed). Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, Essex.

[80]

Philip M. Podsakoff, Scott B. MacKenzie, Lee Jeong-Yeon, and Nathan P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88, 5 (2003), 879. DOI:

[81]

Ned Kock. 2015. Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC) 11, 4 (2015), 1–10. DOI:

Digital Library

[82]

Claes Fornell and David F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18, 1 (1981), 39–50. DOI:

[83]

Jörg Henseler, Christian M. Ringle, and Marko Sarstedt. 2015. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43, 1 (2015), 115–135. DOI:

[84]

James Gaskin, M. James, and J. Lim. 2019. Master validity tool. Retrieved June 27, 2021 from http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com/index.php?title=Plugins.

[85]

Naresh K. Malhotra and Satyabhusan Dash. 2016. Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation (7th ed). Pearson India Education Services Pvt. Ltd., India.

[86]

Arnold M. Lund. 2001. Measuring usability with the use questionnaire. Usability Interface 8, 2 (2001), 3–6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230786746_Measuring_Usability_with_the_USE_Questionnaire.

[87]

Tibert Verhagen, Frans Feldberg, Bart van den Hooff, Selmar Meents, and Jani Merikivi. 2012. Understanding users’ motivations to engage in virtual worlds: A multipurpose model and empirical testing. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 2 (2012), 484–495. DOI:

Digital Library

[88]

Namho Chung, Hyunae Lee, Jin-Young Kim, and Chulmo Koo. 2018. The role of augmented reality for experience-influenced environments: The case of cultural heritage tourism in Korea. Journal of Travel Research 57, 5 (2018), 627–643. DOI:

[89]

Mehmet Mehmetoglu and Marit Engen. 2011. Pine and Gilmore's concept of experience economy and its dimensions: An empirical examination in tourism. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism 12, 4 (2011), 237–255. DOI:

[90]

Haemoon Oh, Ann Marie Fiore, and Miyoung Jeoung. 2007. Measuring experience economy concepts: Tourism applications. Journal of Travel Research 46, 2 (2007), 119–132. DOI:

[91]

Milad Dehghani, Fulya Acikgoz, Atefeh Mashatan, and Seung Hwan Lee. 2021. A holistic analysis towards understanding consumer perceptions of virtual reality devices in the post-adoption phase. Behaviour & Information Technology (2021), 1–19. DOI:

[92]

Tamather Shatnawi and Raed S. Algharabat. 2018. Investigating antecedents and their consequences of usability in online donations: The case of university students' community services programs. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management 18, 2 (2018), 125–154. DOI:

[93]

K. G. Jöreskog. 1970. A general method for analysis of covariance structures. Biometrika 57, 2 (1970), 239–251. DOI:

[94]

Paul Benjamin Lowry, Trent Spaulding, Taylor Michael Wells, Gregory Daniel Moody, Kevin Moffit, and Sebastian Madariaga. 2006. A theoretical model and empirical results linking website interactivity and usability satisfaction. In 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06). Hawaii. IEEE Computer Society, 123a. DOI:

Digital Library

[95]

Yu-Min Fang and Yen-Jung Huang. 2021. Comparison of the usability and flow experience of an exercise promotion virtual reality programme for different age groups. Behaviour & Information Technology 40, 12 (2021), 1–15. DOI:

[96]

Dong Hong Zhu and Ya Ping Chang. 2014. Investigating consumer attitude and intention toward free trials of technology-based services. Computers in Human Behavior 30 (2014), 328–334. DOI:

Digital Library

[97]

Geert Hofstede. 2001. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (2nd ed). Sage Publications, London.

[98]

Robert Hogan, John Johnson, and Stephen Briggs. 1997. Handbook of Personality Psychology. Elsevier Science & Technology, Burlington, Vermont.

[99]

Aslina Saad and Ermie Dharlya Daud. 2020. The acceptance of an online educational management information system (EMIS) among data and information teachers. Journal of Information Systems and Digital Technologies 2, 2 (2020), 1–17. https://journals.iium.edu.my/kict/index.php/jisdt/article/view/124.

[100]

Force Field Entertainment B.V. (n.d.). National Geographic Explore VR. (7 July 2021). Retrieved May 12, 2021 from https://www.oculus.com/experiences/quest/2046607608728563/?locale=en_US.

[101]

Home Run Limited. (n.d.). The conqueror virtual challenges. Retrieved 17 September 2021 from https://www.theconqueror.events/.

Cited By

Dzogbewu TWhitehead Tde Beer DTorrens G(2024)Adoption and Use of Customized Wheelchairs Manufactured for Persons Living with Disability: Modified UTUAT-2 PerspectiveDesigns10.3390/designs90100039:1(3)Online publication date: 30-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/designs9010003
Tang HZhang CLi Q(2024)Assessing Creativity and User Experience in Immersive Virtual Reality with Cultural Heritage LearningInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2405784(1-17)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2405784
Grassini SKoivisto M(2024)Understanding how personality traits, experiences, and attitudes shape negative bias toward AI-generated artworksScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-024-54294-414:1Online publication date: 19-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54294-4

Index Terms

Virtual Reality at a Prehistoric Museum: Exploring the Influence of System Quality and Personality on User Intentions
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Recommendations

Authenticity in Objects and Activities: Determinants of Satisfaction with Virtual Reality Experiences of Heritage and Non-Heritage Tourism Sites
Abstract
Virtual Reality (VR) is becoming an increasingly important technology in a host of industries, including tourism. VR can provide virtual experiences before, during, or in lieu of real-world visits to tourism sites. Hence, providing authentic ...
Building Virtual and Augmented Reality museum exhibitions
Web3D '04: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on 3D Web technology

A system that allows museums to build and manage Virtual and Augmented Reality exhibitions based on 3D models of artifacts is presented. Dynamic content creation based on pre-designed visualization templates allows content designers to create virtual ...
Tourism and Virtual Reality: User Experience Evaluation of a Virtual Environment Prototype
Design, User Experience, and Usability: Users, Contexts and Case Studies
Abstract
Tourism is one of the largest industries and one of the fastest growing sectors in the world. At present and due to accessibility and improvement of technology, the tourism industry has been using experiences based on Virtual Reality, because they ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage

Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage Volume 16, Issue 2

June 2023

312 pages

ISSN:1556-4673

EISSN:1556-4711

DOI:10.1145/3585396

Editor:
Franco Niccolucci
VAST-LAB at PIN, University of Florence, Italy

Issue’s Table of Contents

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 June 2023

Online AM: 25 February 2023

Accepted: 09 September 2022

Revised: 13 July 2022

Received: 25 November 2021

Published in JOCCH Volume 16, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship and Universitas Sebelas Maret

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
615
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)321
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)21

Reflects downloads up to 16 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Dzogbewu TWhitehead Tde Beer DTorrens G(2024)Adoption and Use of Customized Wheelchairs Manufactured for Persons Living with Disability: Modified UTUAT-2 PerspectiveDesigns10.3390/designs90100039:1(3)Online publication date: 30-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/designs9010003
Tang HZhang CLi Q(2024)Assessing Creativity and User Experience in Immersive Virtual Reality with Cultural Heritage LearningInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2405784(1-17)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2405784
Grassini SKoivisto M(2024)Understanding how personality traits, experiences, and attitudes shape negative bias toward AI-generated artworksScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-024-54294-414:1Online publication date: 19-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54294-4

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View full text|Download PDF

View Issue’s Table of Contents