Andersen, L. et al. Adding interactive visual syntax to textual code. In Proceedings of 2020 Conf. Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

Androutsopoulos, I. et al. Natural language interfaces to databases---An introduction. Natural Language Engineering 1, 1 (1995), 29--81

Crossref

Google Scholar

[5]

Balog, M. et al. DeepCoder: Learning to write programs. In Proceedings of 2017 Intern. Conf. Learning Representations; https://openreview.net/forum?id=ByldLrqlx.

Google Scholar

[6]

Barricelli, B.R. et al. End-user development, end-user programming and end-user software engineering: A systematic mapping study. J. Systems and Software 149, (2019), 101--137

Crossref

Google Scholar

[7]

Bock, A.C., and Frank, U. Low-code platform. Business & Information Systems Engineering 63, (2021), 733--740

Crossref

Google Scholar

[8]

Boshernitsan, M., and Downes, M. Visual Programming Languages: A Survey. Technical Report UCB/CSD-04-1368, 2004, UC Berkeley; https://bit.ly/3P0SaX5

Google Scholar

[9]

Burnett, M. et al. End-user software engineering. Commun. ACM 47, 9 (Sept. 2004), 53--58

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

Chasins, S. et al. Rousillon: Scraping distributed hierarchical Web data. In Proceedings of 2018 Symp. User Interface Software and Technology, 963--975

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[11]

Chen, M. Evaluating large language models trained on code, (2021); https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03374

Google Scholar

[12]

Desai, A. Program synthesis using natural language. In Proceedings of 2016 Intern. Conf. Softw. Eng., 345--356

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[13]

Ellis, K. DreamCoder: Bootstrapping inductive program synthesis with wake-sleep library learning. In Proceedings of 2021 Conf. Programming Language Design and Implementation. 835--850

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[14]

Fischer, M.H. et al. DIY assistant: A multi-modal end-user programmable virtual assistant. In Proceedings of 2021 Conf. Programming Language Design and Implementation. 312--327

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[15]

Gulwani, S. Automating string processing in spreadsheets using input-output examples. In Proceedings of 2011 Symp. Principles of Programming Languages. 317--330

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[16]

Harel, D., and Marelly, R. Specifying and executing behavioral requirements: The play-in/play-out approach. Software and Systems Modeling 2, (2003), 82--107

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[17]

Hudak, P. Modular domain specific languages and tools. In Proceedings of 1998 Intern. Conf. Software Reuse. 134--142

Crossref

Google Scholar

[18]

Jacob, A. Infrastructure as code. Web Operations: Keeping the Data on Time. J. Allspaw, and J. Robbins, (eds). O'Reilly, Chapter 5, (2010), 65--80.

Google Scholar

[19]

Kate, R.J. et al. Learning to transform natural to formal languages. In Proceedings of 2005 Conf. Artificial Intelligence. 1062--106; http://www.aaai.org/Library/AAAI/2005/aaai05-168.php

Google Scholar

[20]

Kuhn, T. A survey and classification of controlled natural languages. Computational Linguistics 40, 1 (2014), 121--170; https://bit.ly/42t3JsY.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[21]

Leshed, G. et al. CoScripter: Automating and sharing kow-to knowledge in the enterprise. In Proceedings of 2008 Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1719--1728

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[22]

Li, T.J. et al. PUMICE: A multi-modal agent that learns concepts and conditionals from natural language and demonstrations. In Proceedings of 2019 Symp. User Interface Software and Technology. 577--589

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[23]

Mernik, M. et al. When and how to develop domain-specific languages. ACM Computing Surveys 37, 4 (2005), 316--344

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[24]

Myers, B. et al. Past, present, and future of user interface software tools. Trans. Computer-Human Interaction (Mar. 2000), 3--28

Crossref

Google Scholar

[25]

Myrbakken, H., and Colomo-Palacios, R. DevSecOps: A multivocal literature review. Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination (2017), 17--29.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[26]

Omar, C. et al. Filling Typed Holes with Live GUIs. In Proceedings of 2021 Conf. Programming Language Design and Implementation. 511--525

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[27]

Ouyang, C. From BPMN process models to BPEL Web services. In Proceedings of Intern. Conf. Web Services. (2006)

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[28]

Pasternak, E. et al. Tips for creating a block language with Blockly. In Proceedings of Blocks and Beyond Workshop (2017)

Crossref

Google Scholar

[29]

Resnick, M. et al. Scratch: Programming for all. Commun. ACM 52, 11 (Nov.2009), 60--67

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[30]

Rompf, T., and Odersky, M. Lightweight modular staging: A pragmatic approach to runtime code generation and compiled DSLs. Commun. ACM 55, 6 (June 2012), 121--130

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[31]

Sahay, A. et al. Supporting the understanding and comparison of low-code development platforms. In Proceedings of Euromicro 2020 Conf. Software Engineering and Advanced Applications. 71--178

Crossref

Google Scholar

[32]

Sereshkeh, A.R. et al. VASTA: A vision and language-assisted smartphone task automation system. In Proceedings of 2021 Conf. Intelligent User Interfaces. 22--32

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[33]

Shin, R. Constrained language models yield few-shot semantic parsers. In Proceedings of 2021 Conf. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 7, 699--7715

Crossref

Google Scholar

[34]

Tanimoto, S.L. A perspective on the evolution of live programming. In Proceedings of Intern. Workshop on Live Programming. (2013), 31--34

Crossref

Google Scholar

[35]

van der Aalst, W.M. et al. Robotic process automation. Business Spsampsps Information Systems Eng. 60, (2018), 269--272.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[36]

Vaziri, M. et al. Generating Chat Bots from Web API Specifications. In Proceedings of Symp. New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software. (2017), 44--57

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[37]

Voelter, M., and Lisson, S. Supporting diverse notations in MPS' projectional editor. In Proceedings of Workshop on the Globalization of Modeling Languages. (2014), 7--16; https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01074602/file/GEMOC2014-complete.pdf#page=13

Crossref

Google Scholar

[38]

Wang, Y. et al. Building a semantic parser overnight. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Assoc. for Computational Linguistics. (2015), 1332--1342; https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P15-1129.pdf

Google Scholar

[39]

Yin, P., and Neubig, G. A syntactic neural model for general-purpose code generation. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Assoc. for Computational Linguistics. (2017), 440--450

Crossref

Google Scholar

[40]

Zhang, K. et al. Design, construction, and application of a generic visual language generation environment. IEEE Trans Softw Eng. 27, 4 (2001), 289--307

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Özdemir İSarsar FCalandra B(2025)Low-Code Programming for K-12 EducationEffective Computer Science Education in K-12 Classrooms10.4018/979-8-3693-4542-9.ch006(145-170)Online publication date: 24-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-4542-9.ch006
Frank ASteinke MHommel W(2024)Lowcaf: A Low-Code Protocol Analysis Framework2024 20th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM)10.23919/CNSM62983.2024.10814380(1-7)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.23919/CNSM62983.2024.10814380
Popovic MPopovic MKastelan IDjukic MBasicevic I(2024)PTB-FLA development paradigm adaptation for ChatGPTComputer Science and Information Systems10.2298/CSIS231224036P21:4(1269-1292)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.2298/CSIS231224036P
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Low-Code Programming Models
1. Software and its engineering
  1. Software organization and properties
    1. Software functional properties
    2. Software system structures
      1. Abstraction, modeling and modularity
      2. Software system models
        Model-driven software engineering

Recommendations

Hybrid-view programming of nuclear fusion simulation code in the PGAS parallel programming language XcalableMP

We propose the hybrid-view programming approach in PGAS language XcalableMP.We port Gyrokinetic Toroidal Code - Princeton (GTC-P) to XcalableMP.The comparison of the performance and productivity with XMP and MPI implementations.Hybrid-view ...
Syntactic and semantic features for code-switching factored language models

This paper presents our latest investigations on different features for factored language models for Code-Switching speech and their effect on automatic speech recognition (ASR) performance. We focus on syntactic and semantic features which can be ...
PGAS '09: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Partitioned Global Address Space Programing Models

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

Communications of the ACM Volume 66, Issue 10

October 2023

110 pages

ISSN:0001-0782

EISSN:1557-7317

DOI:10.1145/3625456

Editor:
James Larus
Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY

Issue’s Table of Contents

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 September 2023

Published in CACM Volume 66, Issue 10

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

18
Total Citations
View Citations
31,596
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)3,485
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)261

Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Özdemir İSarsar FCalandra B(2025)Low-Code Programming for K-12 EducationEffective Computer Science Education in K-12 Classrooms10.4018/979-8-3693-4542-9.ch006(145-170)Online publication date: 24-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-4542-9.ch006
Frank ASteinke MHommel W(2024)Lowcaf: A Low-Code Protocol Analysis Framework2024 20th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM)10.23919/CNSM62983.2024.10814380(1-7)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.23919/CNSM62983.2024.10814380
Popovic MPopovic MKastelan IDjukic MBasicevic I(2024)PTB-FLA development paradigm adaptation for ChatGPTComputer Science and Information Systems10.2298/CSIS231224036P21:4(1269-1292)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.2298/CSIS231224036P
Abendroth ABender B(2024)Ein Werkzeug zur Analyse von Komplexität von Low-Code und No-Code Add-ons: Ein Design Science AnsatzA Tool for Analysing the Complexity of Low-Code and No-Code Add-Ons: a Design Science ApproachHMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik10.1365/s40702-024-01109-961:5(1180-1212)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-024-01109-9
Thorgeirsson SGraf OSu ZEdwards JTaeumel M(2024)The Hidden Program State Hurts EveryoneProceedings of the 2024 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software10.1145/3689492.3689813(266-274)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689492.3689813
Rao NTsay JKate KHellendoorn VHirzel M(2024)AI for Low-Code for AIProceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3640543.3645203(837-852)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3640543.3645203
Zhang ZGray JLo DGamess E(2024)Test Case Expression in a Low-Code Development PlatformProceedings of the 2024 ACM Southeast Conference10.1145/3603287.3651211(193-198)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3603287.3651211
Giunchi DNuman NGatti ESteed A(2024)DreamCodeVR: Towards Democratizing Behavior Design in Virtual Reality with Speech-Driven Programming2024 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)10.1109/VR58804.2024.00078(579-589)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/VR58804.2024.00078
Repenning ABasawapatna A(2024)RULER: Prebugging with Proxy-Based Programming2024 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)10.1109/VL/HCC60511.2024.00037(275-281)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/VL/HCC60511.2024.00037
Schenkenfelder BSalomon CSchwandtner MZefferer RDerfler MWimmer M(2024)Leveraging the Power of LLMs to Transform Robot Programs into Low-Code2024 IEEE 29th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)10.1109/ETFA61755.2024.10711043(1-4)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA61755.2024.10711043
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Digital Edition

View this article in digital edition.

Digital Edition

Magazine Site

View this article on the magazine site (external)

Magazine Site

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Abstract

References

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Hybrid-view programming of nuclear fusion simulation code in the PGAS parallel programming language XcalableMP

Syntactic and semantic features for code-switching factored language models

PGAS '09: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Partitioned Global Address Space Programing Models

Comments

Information

Published In

Publisher

Publication History

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View options

PDF

eReader

Digital Edition

Magazine Site

Login options

Full Access

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations