Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3610978.3640793acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Spatial Robotic Experiences as a Ground for Future HRI Speculations

Published: 11 March 2024 Publication History

Abstract

This work illustrates how artistic robotic systems can provide a reservoir of unfamiliarity and a basis for speculation, to open the field toward new ways of thinking about HRI. We reflect on a collaborative project between design students, a media art studio, and design researchers working with the baggage handling department of a strategic European airport. Engaging with the industrial context, we developed 'meta-behaviours' - abstracted ideas of processes carried out on the worksite and passed these over to the students who translated them into robotic enactions based on hardware and a form language developed by the media art studio. The resulting visit experience challenges the audience to decode the installation in terms of meta-behaviours and their possible relations to industrial HRI. We used this to reflect on the value of conducting artistic and speculative work in HRI and to distil actionable recommendations for future research.

References

[1]
Baraka, K. 2023. Why Robotics Labs Should Look More Like Theatres. Connected World. I. Vermeulen, ed. VU University Press.
[2]
Bedini, S.A. 1964. The Role of Automata in the History of Technology. Technology and Culture. 5, 1 (1964), 24--42.
[3]
Bergman, M., Lyytinen, K. and Mark, G. 2007. Boundary Objects in Design: An Ecological View of Design Artifacts. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 8, 11 (Nov. 2007), 546--568.
[4]
Byrne, D. and Lockton, D. 2021. Spooky technology: a reflection on the invisible and otherworldly qualities in everyday technologies. Imaginaries Lab?; School of Design, School of Architecture, and Frank-Ratchye STUDIO for Creative Inquiry, Carnegie Mellon University.
[5]
Chung, S. 2015. Drawing Operations.
[6]
Cross, I. 2003. Music as a Biocultural Phenomenon. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 999, 1 (2003), 106--111.
[7]
Dutch Labour Inspectorate. 2023. Notification document:European Commission notification Balanced Approach procedure for Schiphol. Retrieved January 15, 2024 from https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/binaries/rijksoverheid/documenten/rapporten/2023/09/01/bijlage-3-notification-document-balanced-approach-procedure-schiphol/bijlage-3-notification-document-balanced-approach-procedure-schiphol.pdf
[8]
Galey, A. and Ruecker, S. 2010. How a prototype argues. Literary and Linguistic Computing. 25, 4 (Dec. 2010), 405--424.
[9]
Giaccardi, E. 2019. Histories and Futures of Research through Design: From Prototypes to Connected Things. International Journal of Design. 13, 3 (2019), 139--155.
[10]
Gomez Cubero, C., Pekarik, M., Rizzo, V. and Jochum, E. 2021. The Robot is Present: Creative Approaches for Artistic Expression With Robots. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 8, (2021).
[11]
Gorbet, M.G. 2023. The Spatialized Digital Milieu: An Infrastructure Approach to the Design of Responsive Environments. DDes. Florida International University, Miami Beach.
[12]
Grba, D. 2022. Deep Else: A Critical Framework for AI Art. Digital. 2, 1 (Mar. 2022), 1--32.
[13]
Hemment, D., Murray-Rust, D., Belle, V., Aylett, R., Vidmar, M. and Broz, F. 2022. Experiential AI: Enhancing explainability in artificial intelligence through artistic practice. (Mar. 2022).
[14]
Hemment, D., Zeilinger, M., Vidmar, M., Elwes, J., Warner, H., Sarmiento, D. and Hill, R. 2022. Towards a heuristic model for experiential AI: Analysing the Zizi show in the new real. DRS Biennial Conference Series (Jun. 2022).
[15]
Herath, D., Jochum, E. and St-Onge, D. 2022. Editorial: The Art of Human-Robot Interaction: Creative Perspectives From Design and the Arts. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 9, (2022).
[16]
Herath, D., Kroos, C., and Stelarc eds. 2016. Robots and Art. Springer Singapore.
[17]
Jochum, E. and Goldberg, K. 2016. Cultivating the Uncanny: The Telegarden and Other Oddities. Robots and Art: Exploring an Unlikely Symbiosis. D. Herath, C. Kroos, and Stelarc, eds. Springer. 149--175.
[18]
Jochum, E., Vlachos, E., Christoffersen, A., Nielsen, S., Hameed, I. and Tan, Z.-H. 2016. Using Theatre to Study Interaction with Care Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics. 8, (Aug. 2016).
[19]
Levillain, F., Zibetti, E. and Lefort, S. 2017. Interacting with Non-anthropomorphic Robotic Artworks and Interpreting Their Behaviour. International Journal of Social Robotics. 9, 1 (Jan. 2017), 141--161.
[20]
Li, J., Hu, T., Zhang, S. and Mi, H. 2019. Designing a musical robot for Chinese bamboo flute performance. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium of Chinese CHI (New York, NY, USA, Jun. 2019), 117--120.
[21]
Ljungblad, S., Serholt, S., Milosevic, T., Bhroin, N.N., Nørgård, R.T., Lindgren, P., Ess, C., Barendregt, W. and Obaid, M. 2018. Critical robotics: exploring a new paradigm. Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (New York, NY, USA, Sep. 2018), 972--975.
[22]
Löwgren, J. 2013. Annotated portfolios and other forms of intermediate-level knowledge. Interactions. 20, 1 (Jan. 2013), 30--34.
[23]
Lucero, A. 2015. Using Affinity Diagrams to Evaluate Interactive Prototypes. Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2015 (Cham, 2015), 231--248.
[24]
Luria, M., Hoggenmüller, M., Lee, W.-Y., Hespanhol, L., Jung, M. and Forlizzi, J. 2021. Research through Design Approaches in Human-Robot Interaction. Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (New York, NY, USA, Mar. 2021), 685--687.
[25]
Max-Neef, M.A. 2005. Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics. 53, 1 (Apr. 2005), 5--16.
[26]
Murray-Rust, D. and von Jungenfeld, R. 2017. Thinking through robotic imaginaries. (Mar. 2017).
[27]
Zaga, C, Lupetti, M.L, Forster, D., Murray-Rust, D., Prendergast, J.M., and Abbink, D. 2024. First International Workshop on Workers-Robot Relationships. HRI2024 (2024).
[28]
Rose, D. 2014. Enchanted objects: design, human desire, and the Internet of things. Scribner.
[29]
Schiphol. 2023. Baggage robot takes over the heavy lifting. Retrieved January 15, 2024 from https://www.schiphol.nl/en/blog/cobot-at-schiphol/
[30]
Seifert, U. and Kim, J.H. 2008. Towards a conceptual framework and an empirical methodology in research on artistic human-computer and human-robot interaction. Human Computer Interaction. I. Pavlidis, ed. Citeseer.
[31]
Serholt, S., Ljungblad, S. and Ní Bhroin, N. 2022. Introduction: special issue-critical robotics research. AI & SOCIETY. 37, 2 (Jun. 2022), 417--423.
[32]
Stappers, P.J. and Giaccardi, E. 2017. Research through Design. The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Design Foundation.
[33]
Star, S.L. and Griesemer, J.R. 1989. Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907--39. Social Studies of Science. 19, 3 (Aug. 1989), 387--420.
[34]
Tresset, P. and Fol Leymarie, F. 2013. Portrait drawing by Paul the robot. Computers & Graphics. 37, 5 (Aug. 2013), 348--363.
[35]
Troiano, G.M., Wood, M. and Harteveld, C. 2020. "And This, Kids, Is How I Met Your Mother": Consumerist, Mundane, and Uncanny Futures with Sex Robots. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2020), 1--17.
[36]
Troughton, I.A., Baraka, K., Hindriks, K. and Bleeker, M. 2022. Robotic Improvisers: Rule-Based Improvisation and Emergent Behaviour in HRI. 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (Mar. 2022), 561--569.
[37]
Yuan, S. and Yu, P. 2016. Can't Help Myself.
[38]
Zivanovic, A. and Ihnatowicz, E. 2018. Sound Activated Mobile (SAM) at Cybernetic Serendipity. Symposium on Cybernetic Serendipity Reimagined (Liverpool, 2018), 7.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)AMoRE: Four Perspectives on Talking About and Experiencing RobotsProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685342(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024

Index Terms

  1. Spatial Robotic Experiences as a Ground for Future HRI Speculations

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '24: Companion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
      March 2024
      1408 pages
      ISBN:9798400703232
      DOI:10.1145/3610978
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 11 March 2024

      Check for updates

      Badges

      • Best Paper

      Author Tags

      1. art
      2. human-robot interaction
      3. industrial robotics
      4. interaction design
      5. speculative design

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      HRI '24
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)271
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)49
      Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)AMoRE: Four Perspectives on Talking About and Experiencing RobotsProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685342(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Get Access

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media