Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3613905.3650979acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Unlocking Memories with AI: Exploring the Role of AI-Generated Cues in Personal Reminiscing

Published: 11 May 2024 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    While technology-mediated reminiscing has been studied for decades, generating relevant cues to trigger personal reminiscing remains challenging. The potential of AI in generating relevant content across various domains has been recently recognized, yet its use in facilitating reminiscing is still less explored. This work aims to explore the use of AI in supporting the recall of personal memories associated with significant objects at home. We designed Treasurefinder, a device powered by a large language model (LLM) that generates open-ended questions based on stories stored in NFC-tagged physical objects or cards. We conducted an exploratory study with 12 participants, grouped in pairs, to observe reminiscing behaviors when using Treasurefinder. The results showed the AI-generated questions 1) supported individuals to recall the past, 2) provided new insights about the other person, and 3) encouraged reflection. Notably, the device facilitated active memory retrieval related to cherished objects that are often overlooked.

    Supplemental Material

    MP4 File
    Talk Video

    References

    [1]
    Rowanne Fleck and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2010. Reflecting on reflection: framing a design landscape. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction. ACM, Brisbane Australia, 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1145/1952222.1952269
    [2]
    Christopher Frauenberger, Marjo Rauhala, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2017. In-Action Ethics. Interacting with Computers 29, 2 (March 2017), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iww024
    [3]
    David Frohlich and Rachel Murphy. 2000. The Memory Box. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 4 (Jan. 2000), 238–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00000011
    [4]
    Celia B. Harris, Penny Van Bergen, Paul A. Strutt, Gabrielle K. Picard, Sophia A. Harris, Ruth Brookman, and Karn Nelson. 2022. Teaching Elaborative Reminiscing to Support Autobiographical Memory and Relationships in Residential and Community Aged Care Services. Brain Sciences 12, 3 (March 2022), 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12030374
    [5]
    Subin Kim, Sangsu Jang, Jin-young Moon, Minjoo Han, and Young-Woo Park. 2022. Slide2Remember: an Interactive Wall Frame Enriching Reminiscence Experiences by Providing Re-encounters of Taken Photos and Heard Music in a Similar Period. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, Virtual Event Australia, 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533456
    [6]
    David S. Kirk, Shahram Izadi, Abigail Sellen, Stuart Taylor, Richard Banks, and Otmar Hilliges. 2010. Opening up the family archive. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, Savannah Georgia USA, 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1145/1718918.1718968
    [7]
    Sarah Kulkofsky, Qi Wang, and Yubo Hou. 2010. Why I remember that: The influence of contextual factors on beliefs about everyday memory. Memory & Cognition 38, 4 (June 2010), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.4.461
    [8]
    Cun Li, Jun Hu, Bart Hengeveld, and Caroline Hummels. 2019. Slots-Memento: Facilitating Intergenerational Memento Storytelling and Preservation for the Elderly. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, Tempe Arizona USA, 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1145/3294109.3300979
    [9]
    Karin Niemantsverdriet and Maarten Versteeg. 2016. Interactive Jewellery as Memory Cue: Designing a Sound Locket for Individual Reminiscence. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, Eindhoven Netherlands, 532–538. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2856524
    [10]
    Svetlana Nikitina, Sara Callaioli, and Marcos Baez. 2018. Smart conversational agents for reminiscence. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Software Engineering for Cognitive Services. ACM, Gothenburg Sweden, 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1145/3195555.3195567
    [11]
    William Odom, Richard Banks, David Kirk, Richard Harper, Siân Lindley, and Abigail Sellen. 2012. Technology heirlooms?: considerations for passing down and inheriting digital materials. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Austin Texas USA, 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207723
    [12]
    William T. Odom, Abigail J. Sellen, Richard Banks, David S. Kirk, Tim Regan, Mark Selby, Jodi L. Forlizzi, and John Zimmerman. 2014. Designing for slowness, anticipation and re-visitation: a long term field study of the photobox. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Toronto Ontario Canada, 1961–1970. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557178
    [13]
    Aditya Kumar Purohit, Aditya Upadhyaya, and Adrian Holzer. 2023. ChatGPT in Healthcare: Exploring AI Chatbot for Spontaneous Word Retrieval in Aphasia. In Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, Minneapolis MN USA, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3584931.3606993
    [14]
    Samarth Singhal, Carman Neustaedter, William Odom, Lyn Bartram, and Yasamin Heshmat. 2018. Time-Turner: Designing for Reflection and Remembrance of Moments in the Home. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montreal QC Canada, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173753
    [15]
    Daniel Street and Joseph Wilck. 2023. ’Let’s Have a Chat’: Principles for the Effective Application of ChatGPT and Large Language Models in the Practice of Forensic Accounting. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4351817
    [16]
    Doménique van Gennip, Elise van den Hoven, and Panos Markopoulos. 2015. Things That Make Us Reminisce: Everyday Memory Cues as Opportunities for Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3443–3452. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702460
    [17]
    A. Zijlema, E. Van den Hoven, and B. Eggen. 2017. Preserving objects, preserving memories: repair professionals and object owners on the relation between memories and traces on personal possessions. In Proceedings of the Conference on Product Lifetimes and the Environment (PLATE2017). IOS Press, Delft Netherlands, 453–457. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-820-4-453

    Index Terms

    1. Unlocking Memories with AI: Exploring the Role of AI-Generated Cues in Personal Reminiscing

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '24: Extended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2024
      4761 pages
      ISBN:9798400703317
      DOI:10.1145/3613905
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 11 May 2024

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. AI for Personal Reminiscing
      2. AI-Generated Memory Cues
      3. LLMs

      Qualifiers

      • Work in progress
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Data Availability

      Conference

      CHI '24

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 264
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)264
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)69
      Reflects downloads up to 11 Aug 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      Full Text

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media