A Lexicon for Studying Radicalization in Incel Communities
Authors: 
Emily Klein and 
Jennifer GolbeckAuthors Info & Claims
Emily Klein and Jennifer GolbeckAuthors Info & ClaimsMay 2024
Pages 262 - 267
Abstract
Incels are an extremist online community of men who believe in an ideology rooted in misogyny, racism, the glorification of violence, and dehumanization. In their online forums, they use an extensive, evolving cryptolect – a set of ingroup terms that have meaning within the group, reflect the ideology, demonstrate membership in the community, and are difficult for outsiders to understand. This paper presents a lexicon with terms and definitions for common incel root words, prefixes, and affixes. The lexicon is text-based for use in automated analysis and is derived via a Qualitative Content Analysis of the most frequent incel words, their structure, and their meaning on five of the most active incel communities from 2016 to 2023. This lexicon will support future work examining radicalization and deradicalization/disengagement within the community.
Supplemental Material
MP4 File - PaperSession-5_Hate_Speech_einzeln_Donnerstag_240605_EmilyKlein
A Lexicon for Studying Radicalization in Incel Communities
- Download
- 809.02 MB
References
[1]
Keith Allan. 2018. Taboo words and language: An overview. The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language. Oxford University Press
[2]
Stephane Baele, Lewys Brace, and Debbie Ging. 2023. A diachronic cross-platforms analysis of violent extremist language in the incel online ecosystem. Terrorism and Political Violence: 1-24
[3]
Roy Baumeister and Mark Leary. 1995. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3): 497-529
[4]
Ksenija Bogetić. 2023. Race and the language of incels: Figurative neologisms in an emerging English cryptolect. English Today, 39(2): 89-99
[5]
Robert Cialdini, Wilhelmina Wosinska, Daniel Barrett, Jonathan Butner, and Malgorzata Gornik-Durose. 1999. Compliance with a request in two cultures: The differential influence of social proof and commitment/consistency on collectivists and individualists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(10): 1242-1253
[6]
Charles Efferson, Rafael Lalive, and Ernst Fehr. 2008. The coevolution of cultural groups and ingroup favoritism. Science, 321(5897): 1844-1849
[7]
Debbie Ging. 2017. Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22
[8]
Jennifer Golbeck. 2024. A dataset for the study of online radicalization through incel forum archives. Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media.
[9]
Kelly Gothard. 2020. Exploring incel language and subreddit activity on Reddit. Honors College Thesis, Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Vermont and State Agricultural College, Burlington, Vermont
[10]
Kelly Gothard. 2021. The incel lexicon: Deciphering the emergent cryptolect of a global misogynistic community. M.S. Thesis, Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Vermont and State Agricultural College, Burlington, Vermont
[11]
Zeki Hamawand. 2011. Morphology in English: Word formation in cognitive grammar. Bloomsbury
[12]
Ghayda Hassan, Sébastien Brouillette-Alarie, Séraphin Alava, Divina Frau-Meigs, Lysiane Lavoie, Arber Fetiu, Wynnpaul Varela, Evgueni Borokhovski, Vivek Venkatesh, Cécile Rousseau, and Stijn Sieckelinck. 2018. Exposure to extremist online content could lead to violent radicalization: A systematic review of empirical evidence. International Journal of Developmental Science, 12(1-2): 71-88
[13]
Bruce Hoffman, Jacob Ware, and Ezra Shapiro. 2020. Assessing the threat of incel violence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43:7: 565-587
[14]
Sylvia Jaki, Tom De Smedt, Maja Gwóźdź, Rudresh Panchal, Alexander Rossa, and Guy De Pauw. 2019. Online hatred of women in the Incels.me forum: Linguistic analysis and automatic detection. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 7(2): 240-268
[15]
Timothy Jay. 2009. The utility and ubiquity of taboo words. Perspectives on Psychological Science 4(2): 153–161
[16]
Rebecca Johnson, Sarah Slate, Allison Teevan, and Barbara Juhasz. 2018. The processing of blend words in naming and sentence reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4): 847–857
[17]
Hicham Lahlou and Imran Ho-Abdullah. 2021. The fine line between compounds and portmanteau words in English: A prototypical analysis. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 17 (4): 1684-1694
[18]
Christopher Madan, Andrea Shafer, Michelle Chan, and Anthony Singhal. 2017. Shock and awe: Distinct effects of taboo words on lexical decision and free recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 70(4): 793–810
[19]
Doug McAdam. 1986. Recruitment to High-Risk Activism: The Case of the Freedom Summer. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1): 64-90
[20]
Catharina O'Donnell and Eran Shor. 2022. “This is a political movement, friend”: Why “incels” support violence. The British Journal of Sociology, 73: 336–351
[21]
Anda Solea and Lisa Sugiura. 2023. Mainstreaming the blackpill: Understanding the incel community on TikTok. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 29: 311–336
[22]
Stark, R. and Bainbridge, W.S., 1981. American-born sects: Initial findings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, pp.130-149.
[23]
G.M. Walton., Cohen, G.L., Cwir, D. and Spencer, S.J., 2012. Mere belonging: the power of social connections. Journal of personality and social psychology, 102(3), p.513.
[24]
Małgorzata Waśniewska, 2020. The red pill, unicorns and white knights: Cultural symbolism and conceptual metaphor in the slang of online incel communities. Cultural conceptualizations in language and communication, pp.65-82.
[25]
Renate Ysseldyk, Matheson, K. and Anisman, H., 2010. Religiosity as identity: Toward an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), pp.60-71.
[26]
Ji, N.J., Lee, W.Y., Noh, M.S. and Yip, P.S., 2014. The impact of indiscriminate media coverage of a celebrity suicide on a society with a high suicide rate: Epidemiological findings on copycat suicides from South Korea. Journal of affective disorders, 156, pp.56-61.
[27]
Doug McAdam, 1986. Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer. American journal of sociology, 92(1), pp.64-90.
[28]
Todd Thrash, Elliot, A.J., 2003. Inspiration as a psychological construct. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(4), p.871.
[29]
Eric Swank and Fahs, B., 2011. Pathways to political activism among Americans who have same-sex sexual contact. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 8, pp.126-138.
[30]
Bestvater, S.E. and Monroe, B.L., 2023. Sentiment is not stance: Target-aware opinion classification for political text analysis. Political Analysis, 31(2), pp.235-256.
[31]
Darren Dahl, Frankenberger, K.D. and Manchanda, R.V., 2003. Does it pay to shock? Reactions to shocking and nonshocking advertising content among university students. Journal of advertising research, 43(3), pp.268-280.
[32]
Sarah Shugars, Gitomer, A., McCabe, S., Gallagher, R.J., Joseph, K., Grinberg, N., Doroshenko, L., Welles, B.F. and Lazer, D., 2021. Pandemics, protests, and publics: Demographic activity and engagement on Twitter in 2020. Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media, 1.
[33]
Brandon Sparks., Zidenberg, A.M. and Olver, M.E., 2023. One is the loneliest number: Involuntary celibacy (incel), mental health, and loneliness. Current Psychology, pp.1-15.
[34]
Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(2), 203-210.
[35]
Solley, C. M., & Santos, J. F. (1958). Perceptual learning with partial verbal reinforcement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 183-193.
Recommendations
Analyzing Hate Speech with Incel-Hunters’ Critiques
SMSociety'20: International Conference on Social Media and SocietyThe ubiquity of online media services helps to promote free speech but also provides opportunities for the spread of problematic content such as hate speech. A group of individuals known as “incels” (involuntary celibates) sometimes use online media ...
Are Anti-Feminist Communities Gateways to the Far Right? Evidence from Reddit and YouTube
WebSci '21: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021Researchers have suggested that “the Manosphere,” a conglomerate of men-centered online communities, may serve as a gateway to far right movements. In that context, this paper quantitatively studies the migratory patterns between a variety of groups ...
Empirical Evidence for Reciprocal Radicalization: Conformity of User Comment, Peer Feedback, and Community Emotion in Extreme Misogynistic Social Media Groups
Social Computing and Social MediaAbstractReciprocal radicalization occurs when extremist communities and its individual users mutually fuel one another’s beliefs, emotions, or actions. Although a promising theory for explaining facets of radicalization in social media, research has yet ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
May 2024
395 pages
ISBN:9798400703348
DOI:10.1145/3614419
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 21 May 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Data Availability
PaperSession-5_Hate_Speech_einzeln_Donnerstag_240605_EmilyKlein: A Lexicon for Studying Radicalization in Incel Communities https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3614419.3644005#PaperSession-5_Hate_Speech_einzeln_Donnerstag_240605_EmilyKlein.mp4
Funding Sources
Conference
Websci '24
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 245 of 933 submissions, 26%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 101Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)101
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)82
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML FormatGet Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in