Clearing the Trail: Motivations for Maintenance Work in Open Source
Pages 34 - 36
Abstract
Introducing new maintainers to established projects is critical to the long-term sustainability of open-source projects. Yet, we have little understanding of what motivates developers to join and maintain already established projects. Previous research on volunteering motivations emphasizes that individuals are motivated by a unique set of factors to volunteer in a specific area, suggesting that the motivations behind open-source contributions also depend on the nature of the work. We aim to determine correlations between types of open-source contributions and their specific motivators through surveys of open-source contributors.
References
[1]
Heather Arthur. 2013. Being ridiculed for my open source project. https://harthur.wordpress.com/2013/01/24/771/
[2]
Guilherme Avelino, Eleni Constantinou, Marco Tulio Valente, and Alexander Serebrenik. 2019. On the abandonment and survival of open source projects: an empirical investigation. In Proc. Int’l Symp. Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM). ACM Press, 1–12.
[3]
Cannon Brett. 2018. Setting expectations for open source participation. https://snarky.ca/setting-expectations-for-open-source-participation/
[4]
Brett Bruyere and Silas Rappe. 2007. Identifying the motivations of environmental volunteers. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50, 4 (2007), 503–516.
[5]
Tom Campbell, Lewis Kirkwood, Graeme McLean, Mark Torsius, and Geraint Florida-James. 2021. Trail use, motivations, and environmental attitudes of 3780 European mountain bikers: What is sustainable? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 24 (2021), 12971.
[6]
Fernando Chacón, Maria Luisa Vecina, and Maria Celeste Davila. 2007. THE THREE-STAGE MODEL OF VOLUNTEERS’DURATION OF SERVICE. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 35, 5 (2007), 627–642.
[7]
E Gil Clary, Mark Snyder, and Arthur A Stukas. 1996. Volunteers’ motivations: Findings from a national survey. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 25, 4 (1996), 485–505.
[8]
Jailton Coelho, Marco Tulio Valente, Luciana L Silva, and André Hora. 2018. Why we engage in FLOSS: Answers from core developers. In Proc. Workshop Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE). 114–121.
[9]
John W Creswell. 2007. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
[10]
Marco Gerosa. 2021. The shifting sands of motivation: Revisiting what drives contributors in open source. In Proc. Int’l Conf. Software Engineering (ICSE). 1046–1058.
[11]
Glen T Hvenegaard and Robyn Perkins. 2019. Motivations, commitment, and turnover of bluebird trail managers. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 24, 3 (2019), 250–266.
[12]
Giuseppe Iaffaldano, Igor Steinmacher, Fabio Calefato, Marco Gerosa, and Filippo Lanubile. 2019. Why do developers take breaks from contributing to OSS projects? A preliminary analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.09528.
[13]
Laura Kocksch, Matthias Korn, Andreas Poller, and Susann Wagenknecht. 2018. Caring for IT security: Accountabilities, moralities, and oscillations in IT security practices. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2, CSCW (2018), 1–20.
[14]
Nolan Lawson. 2017. What it feels like to be an open-source maintainer. https://nolanlawson.com/2017/03/05/what-it-feels-like-to-be-an-open-source-maintainer/
[15]
Courtney Miller, David Gray Widder, Christian Kästner, and Bogdan Vasilescu. 2019. Why Do People Give Up FLOSSing? A Study of Contributor Disengagement in Open Source. In IFIP International Conference on Open Source Systems.
[16]
Gregorio Robles, Laura Arjona Reina, Jesús M González-Barahona, and Santiago Dueñas Domínguez. 2016. Women in free/libre/open source software: The situation in the 2010s. In Open Source Systems: Integrating Communities: 12th IFIP WG 2.13 International Conference, OSS 2016, Gothenburg, Sweden, May 30-June 2, 2016, Proceedings 12. 163–173.
[17]
Andrea Galiette Skoglund. 2006. Do not forget about your volunteers: A qualitative analysis of factors influencing volunteer turnover. Health and Social work, 31, 3 (2006), 217.
[18]
Georg Von Krogh, Stefan Haefliger, Sebastian Spaeth, and Martin W Wallin. 2012. Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. MIS quarterly, 649–676.
[19]
Yunwen Ye and Kouichi Kishida. 2003. Toward an understanding of the motivation of open source software developers. In 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings. 419–429.
[20]
Frances Zlotnick. 2017. Open Source Survey. https://opensourcesurvey.org/2017/
Index Terms
- Clearing the Trail: Motivations for Maintenance Work in Open Source
Recommendations
Working for Free? - Motivations of Participating in Open Source Projects
HICSS '01: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences ( HICSS-34)-Volume 7 - Volume 7The success of the Linux operating system has demonstrated the viability of an alternative form of software development open source software that challenges traditional assumptions about software markets. Understanding what drives open source developers ...
Exploring motivations for contributing to open source initiatives
We explore contextual and dispositional correlates of the motivation to contribute to open source initiatives. We examine how the context of the open source project, and the personal values of contributors, are related to the types of motivations for ...
On the Relationship between Newcomer Motivations and Contribution Barriers in Open Source Projects
OpenSym '17: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open CollaborationThere has been extensive research on the the factors that motivate software developers to contribute to an Open Source Software (OSS) project. Contribution barriers are the counter-side to motivations and prevent newcomers from joining the OSS project. ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
In-Cooperation
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 22 October 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Short-paper
Funding Sources
Conference
SPLASH '23
Sponsor:
SPLASH '23: 2023 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Systems, Programming, Languages, and Applications: Software for Humanity
October 22 - 27, 2023
Cascais, Portugal
Upcoming Conference
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 75Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)47
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
Reflects downloads up to 18 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in