Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3626203.3670584acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespearcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open access

Property Prediction of Functional Organic Molecular Crystals with Graph Neural Networks

Published: 17 July 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Predicting the properties of molecular crystals is imperative to the field of materials design. In lieu of alternative methods, advances in machine learning have made it possible to predict the properties of materials before synthesis. This is especially important for organic semiconductors (OSCs) that are prone to exhibit polymorphism, as this phenomenom can impact the properties of a system, including the bandgap in OSCs. While graph neural networks (GNNs) have shown promise in predicting the bandgap in OSCs, few studies have considered the impact of polymorphism on their performance. Using the MatDeepLearn framework, we examine five different graph convolution layers of ALIGNN, GATGNN, CGCNN, MEGNet, and SchNet, which all have graph convolutions implemented in torch geometric. A dataset of functional organic molecular crystals is extracted from the OCELOT database, which has calculated density functional theory (DFT) values for the bandgap as well as several sets of polymorphs. The trained models are then evaluated on several test cases including the polymorphs of ROY. In future work we plan to examine the impact of graph representations on the performance of these models in the case of predicting properties of polymorphic OSCs.

References

[1]
Qianxiang Ai, Vinayak Bhat, Sean M. Ryno, Karol Jarolimek, Parker Sornberger, Andrew Smith, Michael M. Haley, John E. Anthony, and Chad Risko. 2021. OCELOT: An infrastructure for data-driven research to discover and design crystalline organic semiconductors. J. Chem. Phys. 154 (2021), 174705.
[2]
Vinayak Bhat, Parker Sornberger, Balaji Sesha Sarath Pokuri, Rebekah Duke, Baskar Ganapathysubramanian, and Chad Risko. 2023. Electronic, redox, and optical property prediction of organic π -conjugated molecules through a hierarchy of machine learning approaches. Chem. Sci. 14 (2023), 203–213.
[3]
Stanislav S. Borysov, R. Matthias Geilhufe, and Alexander V. Balatsky. 2017. OMDB: An open-access online database for data mining. PLoS ONE 12 (2017), 1–14.
[4]
Chi Chen, Weike Ye, Yunxing Zuo, Chen Zheng, and Shyue Ping Ong. 2019. Graph Networks as a Universal Machine Learning Framework for Molecules and Crystals. Chem. Mater. 31 (2019), 3564–3572.
[5]
K. Choudhary and B. DeCost. 2021. Atomistic Line Graph Neural Network for improved materials property predictions. npj Comput. Mater. 7 (2021), 185.
[6]
Victor Fung, Jiaxin Zhang, Eric Juarez, and Bobby G. Sumpter. 2021. Benchmarking graph neural networks for materials chemistry. npj Computat. Mater. 7 (2021), 84.
[7]
Stefan Grimme, Jens Antony, Stephan Ehrlich, and Helge Krieg. 2010. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. The Journal of chemical physics 132, 15 (2010), 154104.
[8]
C.R. Groom, I.J. Bruno, M.P. Lightfoot, and S.C. Ward. 2016. The Cambridge Structural Database. Acta Cryst. B72 (2016), 171–179.
[9]
Anubhav Jain, Shyue Ping Ong, Geoffroy Hautier, Wei Chen, William Davidson Richards, Stephen Dacek, Shreyas Cholia, Dan Gunter, David Skinner, Gerbrand Ceder, 2013. Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL materials 1, 1 (2013), 011002.
[10]
Georg Kresse and Daniel Joubert. 1999. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Physical review b 59, 3 (1999), 1758.
[11]
Christian Kunkel, Johannes T Margraf, Ke Chen, Harald Oberhofer, and Karsten Reuter. 2021. Active discovery of organic semiconductors. Nature Communications 12, 1 (2021), 2422.
[12]
Ask Hjorth Larsen, Jens Jørgen Mortensen, Jakob Blomqvist, Ivano E Castelli, Rune Christensen, Marcin Dułak, Jesper Friis, Michael N Groves, Bjørk Hammer, Cory Hargus, 2017. The atomic simulation environment—a Python library for working with atoms. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 27 (2017), 273002.
[13]
Steph-Yves Louis, Yong Zhao, Alireza Nasiri, Xiran Wang, Yuqi Song, Fei Luic, and Jianjun Hu. 2020. Graph convolutional neural networks with global attention for improved materials property prediction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22 (2020), 18141–18148.
[14]
Jens Jørgen Mortensen, Ask Hjorth Larsen, Mikael Kuisma, Aleksei V Ivanov, Alireza Taghizadeh, Andrew Peterson, Anubhab Haldar, Asmus Ougaard Dohn, Christian Schäfer, Elvar Örn Jónsson, 2024. GPAW: An open Python package for electronic structure calculations. The Journal of Chemical Physics 160, 9 (2024), 092503.
[15]
Bart Olsthoorn, R Matthias Geilhufe, Stanislav S Borysov, and Alexander V Balatsky. 2019. Band gap prediction for large organic crystal structures with machine learning. Advanced Quantum Technologies 2, 7-8 (2019), 1900023.
[16]
Daniele Padula, Ömer H Omar, Tahereh Nematiaram, and Alessandro Troisi. 2019. Singlet fission molecules among known compounds: finding a few needles in a haystack. Energy & Environmental Science 12, 8 (2019), 2412–2416.
[17]
John P Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof. 1996. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 18 (1996), 3865.
[18]
K.T. Schutt, F. Arbabzadah, S. Chmiela, K.R. Muller, and A. Tkatchenko. 2017. Quantum-chemical insights from deep tensor neural networks. Nat. Commun. 8 (2017), 13890.
[19]
Takuya Taniguchi, Mayuko Hosokawa, and Toru Asahi. 2023. Graph Comparison of Molecular Crystals in Band Gap Prediction Using Neural Networks. ACS Omega 8 (2023), 39481–39489.
[20]
Tian Xie and Jeffrey C Grossman. 2018. Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material properties. Physical review letters 120, 14 (2018), 145301.

Index Terms

  1. Property Prediction of Functional Organic Molecular Crystals with Graph Neural Networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      PEARC '24: Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2024: Human Powered Computing
      July 2024
      608 pages
      ISBN:9798400704192
      DOI:10.1145/3626203
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 17 July 2024

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. ALIGNN
      2. Artifical intelligence
      3. Bridges-2
      4. CGCNN
      5. GATGNN
      6. GNN
      7. MEGNet
      8. SchNet
      9. convolution
      10. graph neural networks
      11. materials science
      12. polymorphism
      13. polymorphs
      14. property prediction

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      • ACCESS

      Conference

      PEARC '24
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 133 of 202 submissions, 66%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 94
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)94
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)33
      Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Get Access

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media