Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3631987acmotherbooksBook PagePublication Pageseducational-resourcesacm-pubtype
A CS1 Open Data Analysis Project with Embedded EthicsJanuary 2023
  • Authors:
  • Shira Wein,
  • Alicia Patterson,
  • Shannon Brick,
  • Sydney Luken
Publisher:
  • Association for Computing Machinery
  • New York
  • NY
  • United States
ISBN:979-8-4007-0468-0
Published:25 January 2024
Pages:
6
Bibliometrics
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract

This final project combines key CS1 programming concepts with ethical analysis. It helps students gain experience with lists, dictionaries, for/while loops, conditional statements, file handling, and functions in Python. Through a data analysis and visualization task, the students put to action their prior knowledge of the aforementioned programming concepts, embedded with an ethics-led discussion of open source data. Open source data (or "open data") is data that is available and accessible to anyone, including for reuse of the data [8]. Students will learn how to think critically about the ethical dimensions of their selected open source data (and future open source data), and provide an analysis of the data within its contemporary cultural context.

Educational-resources Downloads

ZIP
ecse-2022-0014-File003.zip

This zip contains the supplemental materials for this article.

References

  1. Sara Baase. 2012. A gift of fire. Pearson Education Limited.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Geoffrey C Bowker and Susan Leigh Star. 2000. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Emanuelle Burton, Judy Goldsmith, Nicholas Mattei, Cory Siler, and Sara-Jo Swiatek. 2023. Computing and Technology Ethics: Engaging through Science Fiction. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Catherine D'ignazio and Lauren F Klein. 2020. Data feminism. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Timnit Gebru, Jamie Morgenstern, Briana Vecchione, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna M. Wallach, Hal Daumé III, and Kate Crawford. 2018. Datasheets for Datasets. CoRR abs/1803.09010 (2018). arXiv:1803.09010 http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.09010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Manissa M Maharawal and Erin McElroy. 2018. The anti-eviction mapping project: Counter mapping and oral history toward bay area housing justice. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108, 2 (2018), 380--389.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Jacob Metcalf and Kate Crawford. 2016. Where are human subjects in big data research? The emerging ethics divide. Big Data & Society 3, 1 (2016), 2053951716650211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Jennifer C Molloy. 2011. The open knowledge foundation: open data means better science. PLoS biology 9, 12 (2011), e1001195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mimi Onuoha. 2016. The Library of Missing Datasets. Mixed-media installation. https://mimionuoha.com/the-library-of-missing-datasetsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mimi Onuoha. 2016. The point of collection. Data & Society: Points (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kenny Peng, Arunesh Mathur, and Arvind Narayanan. 2021. Mitigating dataset harms requires stewardship: Lessons from 1000 papers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.02922 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Tonia Poteat, Danielle German, and Colin Flynn. 2016. The conflation of gender and sex: Gaps and opportunities in HIV data among transgender women and MSM. Global public health 11, 7-8 (2016), 835--848.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Joanna Radin. 2017. "Digital Natives": how medical and indigenous histories matter for big data. Osiris 32, 1 (2017), 43--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Ergys Ristani, Francesco Solera, Roger Zou, Rita Cucchiara, and Carlo Tomasi. 2016. Performance measures and a data set for multi-target, multi-camera tracking. In European conference on computer vision. Springer, 17--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Jack W Smith, James E Everhart, WC Dickson, William C Knowler, and Robert Scott Johannes. 1988. Using the ADAP learning algorithm to forecast the onset of diabetes mellitus. In Proceedings of the annual symposium on computer application in medical care. American Medical Informatics Association, 261.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Contributors
  • Georgetown University
  • Oregon State University
  • Georgetown University
  • Georgetown University
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations