ReSPect: Enabling Active and Scalable Responses to Networked Online Harassment
Article No.: 117, Pages 1 - 30
Abstract
Online harassment, especially networked harassment at scale, has become an increasingly serious issue that pervades many social media platforms. In this study, we investigated the nature and harms of networked harassment on Twitter through design workshops (n = 11) and developed a set of design goals focusing on empowering the individual to fight back against harassment. We designed Re:SPect, an anti-harassment tool promoting scalable and active responses to networked harassment. We evaluated Re:SPect through a simulated scenario-based study with Twitter users (n = 18) who had directly or indirectly experienced networked harassment. Our findings reveal that users felt safer and more empowered as Re:SPect enabled them to manage interactions with a larger audience. Users felt less anxious about the potential of being harassed, while the summarization features of Re:SPect allowed users to perceive the situation more objectively. Based on the findings, we discuss how Re:SPect's features could be utilized in promoting healthier online discussion, as well as theoretical implications in designing such systems.
References
[1]
Renee Nicole Allen. 2021. From academic freedom to cancel culture: Silencing black women in the legal academy. UCLA L. Rev., Vol. 68 (2021), 364.
[2]
Ishaku Hassan Anaobi, Aravindh Raman, Ignacio Castro, Haris Bin Zia, Damilola Ibosiola, and Gareth Tyson. 2023. Will Admins Cope? Decentralized Moderation in the Fediverse. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023. 3109--3120.
[3]
Shaowen Bardzell and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2011. Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 675--684.
[4]
Jenae Barnes. 2023. Twitter Ends Its Free API: Here's Who Will Be Affected. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jenaebarnes/2023/02/03/twitter-ends-its-free-api-heres-who-will-be-affected/ Section: Business.
[5]
Michael S Bernstein, Eytan Bakshy, Moira Burke, and Brian Karrer. 2013. Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 21--30.
[6]
Aparajita Bhandari, Marie Ozanne, Natalya N Bazarova, and Dominic DiFranzo. 2021. Do You Care Who Flagged This Post? Effects of Moderator Visibility on Bystander Behavior. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 26, 5 (2021), 284--300.
[7]
Haris Bin Zia, Aravindh Raman, Ignacio Castro, Ishaku Hassan Anaobi, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Nishanth Sastry, and Gareth Tyson. 2022. Toxicity in the decentralized web and the potential for model sharing. Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems, Vol. 6, 2 (2022), 1--25.
[8]
Lindsay Blackwell, Tianying Chen, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Cliff Lampe. 2018. When Online Harassment Is Perceived as Justified. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 12, 1 (2018), 10.
[9]
Lindsay Blackwell, Jill Dimond, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Cliff Lampe. 2017. Classification and Its Consequences for Online Harassment: Design Insights from HeartMob. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 1, CSCW (Dec. 2017), 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134659
[10]
Yarimar Bonilla and Jonathan Rosa. 2015. #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American ethnologist, Vol. 42, 1 (2015), 4--17.
[11]
Gwen Bouvier. 2020. Racist call-outs and cancel culture on Twitter: The limitations of the platform's ability to define issues of social justice. Discourse, Context & Media, Vol. 38 (Dec. 2020), 100431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100431
[12]
danah boyd. 2008. Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. YOUTH, IDENTITY, AND DIGITAL MEDIA, David Buckingham, ed., The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, Vol. 2007--16, 1 (2008), 119--142.
[13]
Joshua Braun. 2023. Journalism, Media Research, and Mastodon: Notes on the Future. Digital Journalism (2023), 1--8.
[14]
André Brock Jr. 2020. Distributed Blackness: African American Cybercultures. NYU Press.
[15]
Nicholas Brody. 2021. Bystander Intervention in Cyberbullying and Online Harassment: The Role of Expectancy Violations. International Journal of Communication, Vol. 15, 0 (Jan. 2021), 21. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/14169 Number: 0.
[16]
Nicholas Brody and Anita L Vangelisti. 2016. Bystander intervention in cyberbullying. Communication Monographs, Vol. 83, 1 (2016), 94--119.
[17]
Amanda Burgess-Proctor, Justin W Patchin, and Sameer Hinduja. 2009. Cyberbullying and online harassment: Reconceptualizing the victimization of adolescent girls. Female crime victims: Reality reconsidered (2009), 153--175.
[18]
Derek Caelin. 2022. Decentralized networks vs the trolls. In Fundamental challenges to global peace and security: The future of humanity. Springer, 143--168.
[19]
Jie Cai and Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2019. What are Effective Strategies of Handling Harassment on Twitch? Users' Perspectives. In Conference companion publication of the 2019 on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. 166--170.
[20]
Kalyani Chadha, Linda Steiner, Jessica Vitak, and Zahra Ashktorab. 2020. Women's responses to online harassment. International journal of communication, Vol. 14 (2020), 19.
[21]
Justin Cheng, Michael Bernstein, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Anyone Can Become a Troll: Causes of Trolling Behavior in Online Discussions. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1217--1230. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998213
[22]
Justin Cheng, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and Jure Leskovec. 2015. Antisocial behavior in online discussion communities. In Proceedings of the international aaai conference on web and social media, Vol. 9. 61--70.
[23]
Meredith D. Clark. 2020. DRAG THEM: A brief etymology of so-called ?cancel culture". Communication and the Public, Vol. 5, 3--4 (Sept. 2020), 88--92. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047320961562
[24]
Dominic DiFranzo, Samuel Hardman Taylor, Franccesca Kazerooni, Olivia D Wherry, and Natalya N Bazarova. 2018. Upstanding by design: Bystander intervention in cyberbullying. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12.
[25]
Fernando Dom'inguez-Hernández, Lars Bonell, and Alejandro Mart'inez-González. 2018. A systematic literature review of factors that moderate bystanders' actions in cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, Vol. 12, 4 (2018), bibinfonumpages19 pages.
[26]
Maeve Duggan. 2017. Online harassment 2017. (2017).
[27]
Satu Elo and Helvi Kyng"as. 2008. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, Vol. 62, 1 (2008), 107--115.
[28]
Ksenia Ermoshina and Francesca Musiani. 2022. Safer spaces by design? Federated architectures and alternative socio-technical models for content moderation. In Annual Symposium of the Global Internet Governance Academic Network (GigaNet).
[29]
Michelle Ferrier and Nisha Garud-Patkar. 2018. TrollBusters: Fighting online harassment of women journalists. Mediating misogyny: Gender, technology, and harassment (2018), 311--332.
[30]
Casey Fiesler, Shannon Morrison, and Amy S Bruckman. 2016. An archive of their own: A case study of feminist HCI and values in design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2574--2585.
[31]
Jerry Finn. 2004. A survey of online harassment at a university campus. Journal of Interpersonal violence, Vol. 19, 4 (2004), 468--483.
[32]
Johnathan Flowers. 2022. The Whiteness of Mastodon. https://techpolicy.press/the-whiteness-of-mastodon/
[33]
Jesse Fox and Wai Yen Tang. 2017. Women's experiences with general and sexual harassment in online video games: Rumination, organizational responsiveness, withdrawal, and coping strategies. New media & society, Vol. 19, 8 (2017), 1290--1307.
[34]
Kiran Garimella, Ingmar Weber, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2016. Quote rts on twitter: usage of the new feature for political discourse. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Web Science. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 200--204.
[35]
R Stuart Geiger. 2016. Bot-based collective blocklists in Twitter: the counterpublic moderation of harassment in a networked public space. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 19, 6 (2016), 787--803.
[36]
Ysabel Gerrard. 2018. Beyond the hashtag: Circumventing content moderation on social media. New Media & Society, Vol. 20, 12 (2018), 4492--4511.
[37]
Tarleton Gillespie. 2018. Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media.
[38]
Jennifer Golbeck, Zahra Ashktorab, Rashad O Banjo, Alexandra Berlinger, Siddharth Bhagwan, Cody Buntain, Paul Cheakalos, Alicia A Geller, Rajesh Kumar Gnanasekaran, Raja Rajan Gunasekaran, et al. 2017. A large labeled corpus for online harassment research. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on web science conference. 229--233.
[39]
Chandell Enid Gosse and Victoria Jane O'Meara. 2018. Blockbotting dissent": Publics, counterpublics, and algorithmic public sphere (s). Stream: Inspiring Critical Thought, Vol. 10, 1 (2018), 3--11.
[40]
Joshua Guberman, Carol Schmitz, and Libby Hemphill. 2016. Quantifying toxicity and verbal violence on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion. 277--280.
[41]
Oliver L Haimson, Daniel Delmonaco, Peipei Nie, and Andrea Wegner. 2021. Disproportionate removals and differing content moderation experiences for conservative, transgender, and black social media users: Marginalization and moderation gray areas. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1--35.
[42]
Yim Hyun-su. 2018. #MeToo, feminism dominated Twitter in 2018. https://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20181206000775
[43]
Jane Im, Jill Dimond, Melody Berton, Una Lee, Katherine Mustelier, Mark S. Ackerman, and Eric Gilbert. 2021. Yes: Affirmative Consent as a Theoretical Framework for Understanding and Imagining Social Platforms. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Yokohama Japan, 1--18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445778
[44]
Ujun Jeong, Paras Sheth, Anique Tahir, Faisal Alatawi, H Russell Bernard, and Huan Liu. 2023. Exploring Platform Migration Patterns between Twitter and Mastodon: A User Behavior Study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.09196 (2023).
[45]
Shagun Jhaver, Larry Chan, and Amy Bruckman. 2018a. The view from the other side: The border between controversial speech and harassment on Kotaku in Action. First Monday, Vol. 23, 2 (2018), bibinfonumpages41 pages.
[46]
Shagun Jhaver, Sucheta Ghoshal, Amy Bruckman, and Eric Gilbert. 2018b. Online Harassment and Content Moderation: The Case of Blocklists. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., Vol. 25, 2 (April 2018), 1--33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3185593
[47]
Franccesca Kazerooni, Samuel Hardman Taylor, Natalya N Bazarova, and Janis Whitlock. 2018. Cyberbullying bystander intervention: The number of offenders and retweeting predict likelihood of helping a cyberbullying victim. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 23, 3 (2018), 146--162.
[48]
George Kennedy, Andrew McCollough, Edward Dixon, Alexei Bastidas, John Ryan, Chris Loo, and Saurav Sahay. 2017. Technology solutions to combat online harassment. In Proceedings of the first workshop on abusive language online. 73--77.
[49]
Do Own Donna Kim, Nathaniel Ming Curran, and Hyun Tae Calvin Kim. 2020. Digital Feminism and Affective Splintering: South Korean Twitter Discourse on 500 Yemeni Refugees. International Journal of Communication, Vol. 14 (2020), 19.
[50]
Hyunwoo Kim, Haesoo Kim, Kyung Je Jo, and Juho Kim. 2021. StarryThoughts: Facilitating Diverse Opinion Exploration on Social Issues. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--29.
[51]
Haesoo Kim, HaeEun Kim, Juho Kim, and Jeong-woo Jang. 2022. When Does it Become Harassment? An Investigation of Online Criticism and Calling Out in Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 6, CSCW2 (2022), 1--32.
[52]
Ben Kirman, Conor Lineham, and Shaun Lawson. 2012. Exploring mischief and mayhem in social computing or: how we learned to stop worrying and love the trolls. In CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 121--130.
[53]
Travis Kriplean, Jonathan Morgan, Deen Freelon, Alan Borning, and Lance Bennett. 2012a. Supporting reflective public thought with considerit. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 265--274.
[54]
Travis Kriplean, Michael Toomim, Jonathan Morgan, Alan Borning, and Amy Ko. 2012b. Is this what you meant? Promoting listening on the web with reflect. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1559--1568.
[55]
Colette Langos. 2012. Cyberbullying: The Challenge to Define. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, Vol. 15, 6 (June 2012), 285--289. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0588
[56]
Ho Lee, Jaewon Choi, Kyung Kyu Kim, and Ae Ri Lee. 2014. Impact of anonymity on information sharing through internal psychological processes: A case of South Korean online communities. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), Vol. 22, 3 (2014), 57--77.
[57]
Song Mi Lee, Andrea K Thomer, and Cliff Lampe. 2022. The Use of Negative Interface Cues to Change Perceptions of Online Retributive Harassment. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 6, CSCW2 (2022), 1--23.
[58]
Una Lee and Dann Toliver. 2017. Building Consentful Tech. 2017. http://www.consentfultech.io/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Building-Consentful-Tech.pdf
[59]
Amanda Lenhart, Michele Ybarra, Kathryn Zickuhr, and Myeshia Price-Feeney. 2016. Online harassment, digital abuse, and cyberstalking in America. Data and Society Research Institute.
[60]
Rebecca Lewis, Alice E Marwick, and William Clyde Partin. 2021. ?We Dissect Stupidity and Respond to It": Response Videos and Networked Harassment on YouTube. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 65, 5 (2021), 735--756.
[61]
Paul Benjamin Lowry, Jun Zhang, Chuang Wang, and Mikko Siponen. 2016. Why do adults engage in cyberbullying on social media? An integration of online disinhibition and deindividuation effects with the social structure and social learning model. Information Systems Research, Vol. 27, 4 (2016), 962--986.
[62]
May O Lwin, Benjamin Li, and Rebecca P Ang. 2012. Stop bugging me: An examination of adolescents' protection behavior against online harassment. Journal of adolescence, Vol. 35, 1 (2012), 31--41.
[63]
Kaitlin Mahar, Amy X. Zhang, and David Karger. 2018. Squadbox: A Tool to Combat Email Harassment Using Friendsourced Moderation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montreal QC Canada, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174160
[64]
Thabo Mahlangu, Chunling Tu, and Pius Owolawi. 2018. A review of automated detection methods for cyberbullying. In 2018 International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Computing Applications (ICONIC). IEEE, 1--5.
[65]
Alice E Marwick. 2021. Morally motivated networked harassment as normative reinforcement. Social Media Society, Vol. 7, 2 (2021), 20563051211021378.
[66]
Alice E Marwick and Robyn Caplan. 2018. Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment. Feminist Media Studies, Vol. 18, 4 (2018), 543--559.
[67]
J Nathan Matias, Amy Johnson, Whitney Erin Boesel, Brian Keegan, Jaclyn Friedman, and Charlie DeTar. 2015. Reporting, reviewing, and responding to harassment on Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.03359 (2015), bibinfonumpages63 pages.
[68]
Colten Meisner. 2023. Networked Responses to Networked Harassment? Creators' Coordinated Management of ?Hate Raids" on Twitch. Social Media Society, Vol. 9, 2 (2023), 20563051231179696.
[69]
Pushkar Mishra, Helen Yannakoudakis, and Ekaterina Shutova. 2019. Tackling online abuse: A survey of automated abuse detection methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.06024 (2019).
[70]
Matti Nelimarkka, Jean Philippe Rancy, Jennifer Grygiel, and Bryan Semaan. 2019. (Re) Design to Mitigate Political Polarization: Reflecting Habermas' ideal communication space in the United States of America and Finland. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--25.
[71]
Fayika Farhat Nova, Michael Ann DeVito, Pratyasha Saha, Kazi Shohanur Rashid, Shashwata Roy Turzo, Sadia Afrin, and Shion Guha. 2021. " Facebook Promotes More Harassment" Social Media Ecosystem, Skill and Marginalized Hijra Identity in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--35.
[72]
Jessica A Pater, Moon K Kim, Elizabeth D Mynatt, and Casey Fiesler. 2016. Characterizations of online harassment: Comparing policies across social media platforms. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on supporting group work. 369--374.
[73]
Sai Teja Peddinti, Keith W Ross, and Justin Cappos. 2014. " On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog" a twitter case study of anonymity in social networks. In Proceedings of the second ACM conference on Online social networks. 83--94.
[74]
Whitney Phillips. 2015. This is why we can't have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. Mit Press.
[75]
The Associated Press. 2022. Musk's Twitter has dissolved its Trust and Safety Council. NPR (Dec. 2022). https://www.npr.org/2022/12/12/1142399312/twitter-trust-and-safety-council-elon-musk
[76]
Kususanto Prihadi, Yen Ling Hui, Melissa Chua, and Calvin KW Chang. 2019. Cyber-Victimization and Perceived Depression: Serial Mediation of Self-Esteem and Learned-Helplessness. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, Vol. 8, 4 (2019), 563--574.
[77]
Martin J Riedl, Katie Joseff, Stu Soorholtz, and Samuel Woolley. 2022. Platformed antisemitism on Twitter: Anti-Jewish rhetoric in political discourse surrounding the 2018 US midterm election. new media & society (2022), 14614448221082122.
[78]
Sarah Roberts. 2019. Behind the Screen: Content Moderation in the Shadows of Social Media. Yale University Press.
[79]
Sarah T Roberts. 2016. Commercial content moderation: Digital laborers' dirty work. (2016).
[80]
Jon Ronson. 2016. So You've Been Publicly Shamed. Riverhead Books.
[81]
Alan Z Rozenshtein. 2022. Moderating the Fediverse: Content Moderation on Distributed Social Media. (2022).
[82]
Niloufar Salehi, Roya Pakzad, Nazita Lajevardi, and Mariam Asad. 2023. Sustained Harm Over Time and Space Limits the External Function of Online Counterpublics for American Muslims. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 7, CSCW1 (2023), 1--24.
[83]
Michael Salter. 2013. Justice and revenge in online counter-publics: Emerging responses to sexual violence in the age of social media. Crime, Media, Culture, Vol. 9, 3 (2013), 225--242.
[84]
Amit M Schejter and Noam Tirosh. 2015. ?Seek the meek, seek the just": Social media and social justice. Telecommunications policy, Vol. 39, 9 (2015), 796--803.
[85]
Sarita Schoenebeck, Oliver L Haimson, and Lisa Nakamura. 2021a. Drawing from justice theories to support targets of online harassment. New Media & Society, Vol. 23, 5 (May 2021), 1278--1300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820913122
[86]
Sarita Schoenebeck, Cliff Lampe, and Penny Tridêu. 2023. Online Harassment: Assessing Harms and Remedies. Social Media Society, Vol. 9, 1 (2023), 20563051231157297.
[87]
Sarita Schoenebeck, Carol F. Scott, Emma Grace Hurley, Tammy Chang, and Ellen Selkie. 2021b. Youth Trust in Social Media Companies and Expectations of Justice: Accountability and Repair After Online Harassment. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1--18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449076
[88]
Joseph Seering. 2020. Reconsidering self-moderation: the role of research in supporting community-based models for online content moderation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, CSCW2 (2020), 1--28.
[89]
Joseph Seering, Tianmi Fang, Luca Damasco, Mianhong'Cherie' Chen, Likang Sun, and Geoff Kaufman. 2019. Designing user interface elements to improve the quality and civility of discourse in online commenting behaviors. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.
[90]
Martin EP Seligman. 1972. Learned helplessness. Annual review of medicine, Vol. 23, 1 (1972), 407--412.
[91]
Miriah Steiger, Timir J Bharucha, Sukrit Venkatagiri, Martin J Riedl, and Matthew Lease. 2021. The psychological well-being of content moderators: the emotional labor of commercial moderation and avenues for improving support. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--14.
[92]
Leo Graiden Stewart, Ahmer Arif, A Conrad Nied, Emma S Spiro, and Kate Starbird. 2017. Drawing the lines of contention: Networked frame contests within# BlackLivesMatter discourse. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, CSCW (2017), 1--23.
[93]
Sharifa Sultana, Mitrasree Deb, Ananya Bhattacharjee, Shaid Hasan, SM Raihanul Alam, Trishna Chakraborty, Prianka Roy, Samira Fairuz Ahmed, Aparna Moitra, M Ashraful Amin, et al. 2021. ?Unmochon': A Tool to Combat Online Sexual Harassment over Facebook Messenger. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--18.
[94]
Josh Taylor and Dan Milmo. 2023. How Twitter's new drastic changes will affect what users can view on the site. The Guardian (July 2023). https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jul/03/how-twitter-new-changes-will-affect-users-rate-limited-limit-exceeded-restrictions
[95]
Samuel Hardman Taylor, Dominic DiFranzo, Yoon Hyung Choi, Shruti Sannon, and Natalya N Bazarova. 2019. Accountability and empathy by design: Encouraging bystander intervention to cyberbullying on social media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--26.
[96]
Dias Oliva Thiago, Antonialli Dennys Marcelo, and Alessandra Gomes. 2021. Fighting hate speech, silencing drag queens? artificial intelligence in content moderation and risks to lgbtq voices online. Sexuality & culture, Vol. 25, 2 (2021), 700--732.
[97]
Kevin Veale and Kevin Veale. 2020. Problematic Tools and Platform Complicity. Gaming the Dynamics of Online Harassment (2020), 107--128.
[98]
Jessica Vitak, Kalyani Chadha, Linda Steiner, and Zahra Ashktorab. 2017. Identifying Women's Experiences With and Strategies for Mitigating Negative Effects of Online Harassment. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, Portland Oregon USA, 1231--1245. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998337
[99]
Kurt Wagner. 2023. Twitter cuts workers addressing hate speech and trust and safety as Elon Musk's chaotic revamp continues. https://fortune.com/2023/01/07/twitter-cuts-workers-hate-speech-trust-safety-elon-musk-revamp/
[100]
Magdalena Wojcieszak, Andreu Casas, Xudong Yu, Jonathan Nagler, and Joshua A Tucker. 2021. Echo chambers revisited: The (overwhelming) sharing of in-group politicians, pundits and media on Twitter. (2021).
[101]
Randy Yee Man Wong, Christy MK Cheung, Bo Xiao, and Jason Bennett Thatcher. 2021. Standing up or standing by: Understanding bystanders' proactive reporting responses to social media harassment. Information Systems Research, Vol. 32, 2 (2021), 561--581.
[102]
Austin P Wright, Omar Shaikh, Haekyu Park, Will Epperson, Muhammed Ahmed, Stephane Pinel, Duen Horng Chau, and Diyi Yang. 2021. RECAST: Enabling User Recourse and Interpretability of Toxicity Detection Models with Interactive Visualization. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--26.
[103]
Haris Bin Zia, Jiahui He, Aravindh Raman, Ignacio Castro, Nishanth Sastry, and Gareth Tyson. 2023. Flocking to mastodon: Tracking the great twitter migration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.14294 (2023). io
Index Terms
- ReSPect: Enabling Active and Scalable Responses to Networked Online Harassment
Recommendations
Identifying Women's Experiences With and Strategies for Mitigating Negative Effects of Online Harassment
CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social ComputingThe popularity, availability, and ubiquity of information and communication technologies create new opportunities for online harassment. The present study evaluates factors associated with young adult women's online harassment experiences through a ...
Silencing Women? Gender and Online Harassment
While gendered online harassment has received increased attention in academic and public debates, there is a lack of empirical studies examining gender differences in experiences with online harassment. Relying on two independent large-scale population ...
Empathy, self-control, and online harassment: A partial test of Agnew's social concern theory
AbstractIn conceptualizing Social Concern Theory, Robert Agnew argued that social concern can serve as a protective factor against crime and influence the relationship between traditional correlates of crime (e.g., low self-control) and ...
Highlights- We conducted a partial test of Agnew's (2014) social concern theory in explaining online harassment perpetration.
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 26 April 2024
Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW1
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 227Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)227
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)43
Reflects downloads up to 01 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in