Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3649405.3659532acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Values and Beliefs Underpinning K-12 Computing Education

Published: 08 July 2024 Publication History

Abstract

K-12 computing education research is a rapidly growing field of research, both driven by and driving the implementation of computing as a school and extra-curricular subject globally. Within discipline-based education research, it is a new and emerging field, drawing on fields such as mathematics and science education research for inspiration and theoretical bases. The urgency around investigating effective teaching and learning in computing in school alongside broadening participation has led to much of the field being focused on empirical research. Less attention has been paid to the underlying philosophical assumptions informing the discipline, which might include a critical examination of the rationale for K-12 computing education, its goals and perspectives, and associated inherent values and beliefs. The goals of this research project are to understand the implicit and hidden values, perspectives and goals underpinning computing education at school. This will be achieved through a critical examination of a wide body of literature leading to the development of a categorization and framework.

References

[1]
Christian Dindler, Ole Sejer Iversen, Michael E. Caspersen, and Rachel Charlotte Smith. 2022. Computational Empowerment. In Computational Thinking Education in K--12: Artificial Intelligence Literacy and Physical Computing. The MIT Press, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13375.003.0009
[2]
Michael Goldweber, John Barr, Tony Clear, Renzo Davoli, Samuel Mann, Elizabeth Patitsas, and Scott Portnoff. 2013. A framework for enhancing the social good in computing education: a values approach. ACM Inroads, Vol. 4, 1 (2013), 58--79.
[3]
Yasmin B Kafai and Chris Proctor. 2022. A revaluation of computational thinking in K--12 education: Moving toward computational literacies. Educational Researcher, Vol. 51, 2 (2022), 146--151.
[4]
Philip Machanick. 2003. Principles versus Artifacts in Computer Science Curriculum Design. Computers & Education, Vol. 41, 2 (2003), 191--201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360--1315(03)00045--9
[5]
Stefanie L Marshall and Ain A Grooms. 2022. Industry's Push for Computer Science Education: Is Computer Science Really for All? Policy Futures in Education, Vol. 0, 0 (2022), 14782103211045601. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103211045601
[6]
Oliver McGarr and Keith Johnston. 2020. Curricular Responses to Computer Science Provision in Schools: Current Provision and Alternative Possibilities. The Curriculum Journal, Vol. 31, 4 (2020), 745--756. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.40
[7]
Pekka Mertala. 2021. The Pedagogy of Multiliteracies as a Code Breaker: A Suggestion for a Transversal Approach to Computing Education in Basic Education. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 52, 6 (2021), 2227--2241. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13125
[8]
Rafi Santo, Leigh Ann DeLyser, June Ahn, Anthony Pellicone, Julia Aguiar, and Stephanie Wortel-London. 2019. Equity in the Who, How and What of Computer Science Education: K12 School District Conceptualizations of Equity in 'CS for All' Initiatives. In 2019 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT) (2019-02). RESPECT, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 1--8. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT46404.2019.8985901
[9]
Matti Tedre and Henriikka Vartiainen. 2023. K-12 Computing Education for the AI Era: From Data Literacy to Data Agency. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1. ACM, New York, USA, 1--2.
[10]
Lisa Towne and Richard J. Shavelson (Eds.). 2002. Scientific Research in Education. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
[11]
Emiliana Vegas, Michael Hansen, and Brian Fowler. 2021. Building Skills for Life: how to expand and improve computer science education around the world. Policy Report. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/essay/building-skills-for-life-how-to-expand-and-improve-computer-science-education-around-the-world/
[12]
Felix Winkelnkemper, Lukas Höper, and Carsten Schulte. 2023. ARIadne--An Explanation Model for Digital Artefacts. Informatics in Education (2023), 1--26.
[13]
Benjamin S Wohl, Sophie Beck, and Lynne Blair. 2017. The Future of the Computing Curriculum: How the Computing Curriculum Instills Values and Subjectivity in Young People. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, Vol. 1, 1 (2017), 21--29.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ITiCSE 2024: Proceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 2
July 2024
125 pages
ISBN:9798400706035
DOI:10.1145/3649405
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 July 2024

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. K-12 computing education
  2. beliefs
  3. philosophy
  4. values

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Conference

ITiCSE 2024
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

Upcoming Conference

ITiCSE '25
Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
June 27 - July 2, 2025
Nijmegen , Netherlands

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 119
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)119
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17
Reflects downloads up to 31 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media