Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3652988.3673964acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesivaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Case study in choosing a graphical character to support reminiscence therapy for those living with dementia

Published: 26 December 2024 Publication History

Abstract

The present study describes the process employed to identify a suitable intelligent virtual agent (IVA) for the AMPER App supporting reminiscence therapy for those living with dementia through the use of a facilitating agent. This included three distinct phases: 1) co-creation with project stakeholders and identification of a set of desirable IVA traits; 2) a blind internal team rating process to select a subset from available IVAs; 3) a character survey with healthy older adults to select a final 4 IVAs (2 male, 2 female). We analyse the results, assess inter-subject agreement, and suggest guidelines for IVA selection.

References

[1]
Astell AJ, Bouranis N, Hoey J, Lindauer A, Mihailidis A, Nugent C, and Robillard JM. 2019. Technology and Dementia: The Future is Now. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 47, 3 (2019), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1159/000497800
[2]
Matthew Peter Aylett and Marta Romeo. 2023. You Don’t Need to Speak, You Need to Listen: Robot Interaction and Human-Like Turn-Taking. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces. 1–5.
[3]
Timothy Bickmore. 2022. Health-Related Applications of Socially Interactive Agents (1 ed.). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 403–436. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563659.3563672
[4]
Timothy Bickmore and Rosalind Picard. 2004. Towards caring machines. 1489–1492. https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.986097
[5]
Timothy Bickmore, Daniel Schulman, and Langxuan Yin. 2009. Engagement vs. deceit: Virtual humans with human autobiographies. In Intelligent Virtual Agents: 9th International Conference, IVA 2009 Amsterdam, The Netherlands, September 14-16, 2009 Proceedings 9. Springer, 6–19.
[6]
Timothy W. Bickmore, Everlyne Kimani, Ha Trinh, Alexandra Pusateri, Michael K. Paasche-Orlow, and Jared W. Magnani. 2018. Managing Chronic Conditions with a Smartphone-based Conversational Virtual Agent. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (Sydney, NSW, Australia) (IVA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1145/3267851.3267908
[7]
Marissa Bond, David M. W. Powers, and Parimala Raghavendra. 2021. Creating Engaging Embodied Conversational Agents. Springer Singapore, Singapore, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2312-7_6
[8]
Cyril Brom, Jiří Lukavskỳ, and Rudolf Kadlec. 2010. Episodic memory for human-like agents and human-like agents for episodic memory. International Journal of Machine Consciousness 2, 02 (2010), 227–244.
[9]
M Brueckl and F Heuer. 2022. irrNA: Coefficients of Interrater Reliability - Generalized for Randomly Incomplete Datasets. (2022). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=irrNA
[10]
J Campos. 2010. MAY: my Memories Are Yours. An interactive companion that saves the users memories. Ph. D. Dissertation. Master thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico.
[11]
M. Core, D. Traum, H.C. Lane, W. Swartout, J. Gratch, M. van Lent, and S. Marsella. 2006. Teaching Negotiation Skills through Practice and Reflection with Virtual Humans. Simulation 82, 11 (2006), 685–701.
[12]
Kerstin Dautenhahn. 1998. Story-Telling in Virtual Environments. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:2869853
[13]
Anna Hunt, Anthony Martyr, Laura D Gamble, Robin G Morris, Jeanette M Thom, Claire Pentecost, and Linda Clare. 2023. The associations between personality traits and quality of life, satisfaction with life, and well-being over time in people with dementia and their caregivers: findings from the IDEAL programme. BMC geriatrics 23, 1 (2023), 1–12.
[14]
M. Joosse, M. Lohse, J. G. Pérez, and V. Evers. 2013. What you do is who you are: The role of task context in perceived social robot personality. In Proc. of Robotics and automation 2013 IEEE international conference. IEEE, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2134–2139. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630863
[15]
Reshmashree B Kantharaju, Dominic De Franco, Alison Pease, and Catherine Pelachaud. 2018. Is two better than one? Effects of multiple agents on user persuasion. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. 255–262.
[16]
Terry K Koo and Mae Y Li. 2016. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of chiropractic medicine 15, 2 (2016), 155–163.
[17]
S. Kopp, L. Gesellensetter, N. C. Krämer, and I. Wachsmuth. 2005. A Conversational Agent as Museum Guide - Design and Evaluation of a Real-World Application. In Intelligent Virtual Agents Conference. Springer-Verlag, Greece, 329–343.
[18]
Kwan Min Lee, Wei Peng, Seung-A Jin, and Chang Yan. 2006. Can Robots Manifest Personality?: An Empirical Test of Personality Recognition, Social Responses, and Social Presence in Human–Robot Interaction. J. of Commun. 56 (2006), 754–772. Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00318.x
[19]
Iolanda Leite, Carlos Martinho, and Ana Paiva. 2013. Social robots for long-term interaction: a survey. International Journal of Social Robotics 5 (2013), 291–308.
[20]
Veiko Lember, Taco Brandsen, and Piret Tõnurist. 2019. The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation. Public Management Review 21, 11 (2019), 1665–1686.
[21]
Mei Yii Lim. 2012. Memory models for intelligent social companions. Human-Computer Interaction: The Agency Perspective (2012), 241–262.
[22]
Mei Yii Lim, José David Aguas Lopes, David A. Robb, Bruce W. Wilson, Meriam Moujahid, Emanuele De Pellegrin, and Helen Hastie. 2022. We are all Individuals: The Role of Robot Personality and Human Traits in Trustworthy Interaction. In 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). 538–545. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900772
[23]
Petra Maresova, Signe Tomsone, Petre Lameski, Joana Madureira, Ana Mendes, Eftim Zdravevski, Ivan Chorbev, Vladimir Trajkovik, Moriah Ellen, and Kasper Rodile. 2018. Technological solutions for older people with Alzheimer’s disease. Current Alzheimer Research 15, 10 (2018), 975–983.
[24]
Patrizia Marti and Liam J Bannon. 2009. Exploring user-centred design in practice: Some caveats. Knowledge, technology & policy 22 (2009), 7–15.
[25]
M. Mateas and A. Stern. 2003. Facade: An Experiment in Building a Fully-Realized Interactive Drama. In Game Developers Conference: Game Design Track. San Jose, California.
[26]
Robert R McCrae and Paul T Costa. 1987. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.Journal of personality and social psychology 52, 1 (1987), 81.
[27]
Clifford Nass, Katherine . Isbister, and Eun-Ju Lee. 2001. Truth is beauty: researching embodied conversational agents. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 374–402.
[28]
Katherine Nelson. 1993. The psychological and social origins of autobiographical memory. Psychological science 4, 1 (1993), 7–14.
[29]
Nathan Pike. 2011. Using false discovery rates for multiple comparisons in ecology and evolution. Methods in ecology and Evolution 2, 3 (2011), 278–282.
[30]
R R Core Team 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2013).
[31]
Deborah Richards, Paulo Sergio Miranda Maciel, and Heidi Janssen. 2023. The Co-Design of an Embodied Conversational Agent to Help Stroke Survivors Manage Their Recovery. Robotics 12, 5 (2023), 120.
[32]
Caroline Rizzi, Colin G Johnson, Fabio Fabris, and Patricia A Vargas. 2017. A situation-aware fear learning (safel) model for robots. Neurocomputing 221 (2017), 32–47.
[33]
Dylan GM Schouten, Agnes A Deneka, Mariët Theune, Mark A Neerincx, and Anita HM Cremers. 2023. An embodied conversational agent coach to support societal participation learning by low-literate users. Universal access in the information society 22, 4 (2023), 1215–1241.
[34]
Silke ter Stal, Monique Tabak, Harm op den Akker, Tessa Beinema, and Hermie Hermens. 2020. Who do you prefer? The effect of age, gender and role on users’ first impressions of embodied conversational agents in eHealth. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 36, 9 (2020), 881–892.
[35]
J. Ventura, M. Ventura, and J.C. Olabe. 2005. Embodied conversational agents: developing usable agents [education instruction applications]. In Proceedings. IEEE SoutheastCon, 2005.663–669. https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.2005.1423322
[36]
Steve Whittaker, Yvonne Rogers, Elena Petrovskaya, and Hongbin Zhuang. 2021. Designing Personas for Expressive Robots: Personality in the New Breed of Moving, Speaking, and Colorful Social Home Robots. ACM Trans. Human-Robot Interact. 10, 8 (February 2021), 25 pages. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/3424153
[37]
Shuo Zhou, Timothy Bickmore, Michael Paasche-Orlow, and Brian Jack. 2014. Agent-User Concordance and Satisfaction with a Virtual Hospital Discharge Nurse. In Intelligent Virtual Agents, Timothy Bickmore, Stacy Marsella, and Candace Sidner (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 528–541.

Index Terms

  1. Case study in choosing a graphical character to support reminiscence therapy for those living with dementia

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IVA '24: Proceedings of the 24th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents
      September 2024
      337 pages
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 26 December 2024

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. dementia
      2. social agents

      Qualifiers

      • Extended-abstract
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      • EPSRC

      Conference

      IVA '24
      Sponsor:
      IVA '24: ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents
      September 16 - 19, 2024
      GLASGOW, United Kingdom

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 53 of 196 submissions, 27%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 39
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)39
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26
      Reflects downloads up to 11 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media