Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3660395.3660400acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaibdfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Q-learning based Dynamic Scheduling for No-wait Flow Shop with Maintenance Window and Minimization of Total Tardiness

Published: 01 June 2024 Publication History

Abstract

This paper discusses the dynamic no-wait permutation flow shop scheduling Problem (PFSP). Orders arrive in the manufacturing system dynamically while the preventative maintenance (PM) is considered on the last machine. Q-learning is applied to provide the real-time intelligent scheduling for the dynamic PFSP to minimize the total tardiness cost for all orders entering the system. To facilitate this, we introduce a vast array of instances to train our Q-table. The learning progression demonstrates that the trained agent can select the optimal dispatching rule at each decision juncture. Upon completion of the training, we retain the trained model and compare it with SPT, FIFO, LPT, EDD. The comparative analysis indicates a substantial performance advantage of our trained scheduling agent over these rules.

References

[1]
Zhang X, Li X T, Yin M H. An enhanced genetic algorithm for the distributed assembly permutation flowshop scheduling problem[J]. International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation, 2020, 15(2): 113-124.
[2]
P. Valledor, A. Gomez, P. Priore, and J. Puente, "Solving multi-objective rescheduling problems in dynamic permutation flow shop environments with disruptions," International Journal of Production Research, vol. 56, issue. 19, pp. 6363-6377, 2018.
[3]
Xu J, Yin Y, Cheng T C E, An improved memetic algorithm based on a dynamic neighbourhood for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2014, 52(4): 1188-1199.
[4]
Rahman H, Sarker R, Essam D. Permutation Flow Shop Scheduling with dynamic job order arrival[C]//2013 IEEE conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems (CIS). IEEE, 2013: 30-35.
[5]
Al-Behadili M, Ouelhadj D, Jones D. Multi-objective particle swarm optimisation for robust dynamic scheduling in a permutation flow shop[C]//Intelligent Systems Design and Applications: 16th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA 2016) held in Porto, Portugal, December 16-18, 2016. Springer International Publishing, 2017: 498-507.
[6]
Yang S, Xu Z, Wang J. Intelligent decision-making of scheduling for dynamic permutation flowshop via deep reinforcement learning [J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(3): 1019.
[7]
Yan Q, Wu W, Wang H. Deep reinforcement learning for distributed flow shop scheduling with flexible maintenance [J]. Machines, 2022, 10(3): 210.
[8]
Waubert de Puiseau C, Meyes R, Meisen T. On reliability of reinforcement learning based production scheduling systems: a comparative survey[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2022, 33(4): 911-927.
[9]
Perez-Gonzalez P, Framinan JM. 2009. Scheduling permutation flowshops with initial availability constraint: analysis of solutions and constructive heuristics. Comput Oper Res 36:2866–2876
[10]
Graham R, Lawer E, Lenstra J, Rinnooy Kan A. Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: a survey. Annals of Discrete Mathematics 1979; 5:287–326.
[11]
Rajendran, Chandrasekharan, and Oliver Holthaus. "A comparative study of dispatching rules in dynamic flowshops and jobshops." European journal of operational research 116.1, 1999: 156-170.
[12]
Kalczynski, Pawel J., and Jerzy Kamburowski. "An improved NEH heuristic to minimize makespan in permutation flow shops." Computers & Operations Research 35.9, 2008: 3001-3008.

Index Terms

  1. Q-learning based Dynamic Scheduling for No-wait Flow Shop with Maintenance Window and Minimization of Total Tardiness

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AIBDF '23: Proceedings of the 2023 3rd Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Forum
      September 2023
      577 pages
      ISBN:9798400716362
      DOI:10.1145/3660395
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 01 June 2024

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      AIBDF 2023

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 9
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
      Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media