Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Open access
Just Accepted

Longitudinal Study of Mobile Telepresence Robots in Older Adults’ Homes: Uses, Social Connection, and Comfort with Technology

Online AM: 11 July 2024 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Mobile telepresence robots can help reduce loneliness by facilitating people to visit each other and have more social presence than visiting via video or audio calls. However, using new technology can be challenging for many older adults. In this paper, we examine how older adults use and want to use mobile telepresence robots, how these robots affect their social connection, and how they can be improved for older adults’ use. We placed a mobile telepresence robot in the home of older adult primary participants (N = 7; age 60+) for 7 months and facilitated monthly activities between them and a secondary participant (N = 8; age 18+) of their choice. Participants used the robots as they liked between monthly activities. We collected diary entries and monthly interviews from primary participants and a final interview from secondary participants. Results indicate that older adults found many creative uses for the robots, including conversations, board games, and hide ‘n’ seek. Several participants felt more socially connected with others and a few had improved their comfort with technology because of their use of the robot. They also suggested design recommendations and updates for the robots related to size, mobility, and more, which can help practitioners improve robots for older adults’ use.

    References

    [1]
    Amazon. (n.d.). Amazon Astro, Household robot for home monitoring, with Alexa, includes 30-day trial of Ring Protect Pro. Retrieved February 1, 2024, from https://www.amazon.com/Introducing-Amazon-Astro/dp/B078NSDFSB/ref=sr_1_2?keywords=astro+robot&qid=1706228999&sr=8-2
    [2]
    APA. (2021, September). Older Adults’ Health and Age-Related Changes, American Psychological Association. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/pi/aging/resources/guides/older
    [3]
    Baggett, R., Simecek, M., Fraune, M., & Tsui, K. (n.d.). Temporal Progression of Older Adults through Technology Acceptance Phases for Mobile Telepresence Robots in Domestic Environments. Under Review.
    [4]
    Baggett, R., Simecek, M., Chambellan, C., Tsui, K., & Fraune, M. (n.d.). Fluidity in the Phased Framework of Technology Acceptance: Case Study to Gain a Holistic Understanding of (Older Adult) Participant Advancement Through Acceptance Phases with Mobile Telepresence Robots. Under Review.
    [5]
    Bakas, T., Procter Endowed Chair, J. E., Sampsel, D., Israel, J., Chamnikar, A., Student, G., Bodnarik, B., to Student, B., Greer Clark, J., Professor, A., Gresham Ulrich, M., Vanderelst, D., Professor, A., & Professor, F. (2018). Using Telehealth for Older Adults 1 Using Telehealth to Optimize Healthy Independent Living for Older Adults: A Feasibility Study Using Telehealth for Older Adults 2.
    [6]
    Boudouraki, A., Fischer, J. E., Reeves, S., & Rintel, S. (2023). “Being in on the Action” in Mobile Robotic Telepresence: Rethinking Presence in Hybrid Participation. 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568162.3576961
    [7]
    Broadbent, E., Kerse, N., Peri, K., Robinson, H., Jayawardena, C., Kuo, T., Datta, C., Stafford, R., Butler, H., Jawalkar, P., Amor, M., Robins, B., & Macdonald, B. (2016). Benefits and problems of health-care robots in aged care settings: A comparison trial. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 35(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.12190
    [8]
    Brown, S. C. (2023, June 5). General Technology: Report: Average selling price of a smartphone in North America jumped $119. https://www.androidauthority.com/average-smartphone-cost-2023-3331896/
    [9]
    Buehler, R., & Nobis, C. (2010). Travel behavior in aging societies: Comparison of Germany and the United States. Transportation Research Record, 2182, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.3141/2182-09
    [10]
    CDC. (2015, January 15). Indicator definitions - older adults, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/cdi/definitions/older-adults.html
    [11]
    Cesta, A., Cortellessa, G., Orlandini, A., & Tiberio, L. (2012). Addressing the long-term evaluation of a telepresence robot for the elderly. ICAART 2012 - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, 1, 652–663. https://doi.org/10.5220/0003884306520663
    [12]
    Cesta, A., Cortellessa, G., Orlandini, A., & Tiberio, L. (2016). Long-Term Evaluation of a Telepresence Robot for the Elderly: Methodology and Ecological Case Study. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(3), 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0337-z
    [13]
    Cornwell, E. Y., & Waite, L. J. (2009). Measuring social isolation among older adults using multiple indicators from the nshap study. Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64(SUPPL.1). https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp037
    [14]
    De Graaf, M., Ben Allouch, S., & Van Dijk, J. (2017). Why Do They Refuse to Use My Robot?: Reasons for Non-Use Derived from a Long-Term Home Study. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Part F127194, 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020236
    [15]
    de Graaf, M. M. A., Ben Allouch, S., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2018). A phased framework for long-term user acceptance of interactive technology in domestic environments. New Media and Society, 20(7), 2582–2603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817727264
    [16]
    Desai, M., Tsui, K. M., Yanco, H. A., & Uhlik, C. (2011). Essential Features of Telepresence Robots.
    [17]
    Double 3. (2019, March 1). Double 3, Double Robotics - Telepresence Robot for the Hybrid Office. https://www.doublerobotics.com/
    [18]
    Ezer, N., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2009). LNCS 5615 - Attitudinal and Intentional Acceptance of Domestic Robots by Younger and Older Adults. In LNCS (Vol. 5615).
    [19]
    Fearn, M., Harper, R., Major, G., Bhar, S., Bryant, C., Dow, B., Dunt, D., Mnatzaganian, G., O’Connor, D., Ratcliffe, J., Samuel, S., Bagnall, A. M., & Doyle, C. (2021). Befriending Older Adults in Nursing Homes: Volunteer Perceptions of Switching to Remote Befriending in the COVID-19 Era. Clinical Gerontologist, 44(4), 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2020.1868646
    [20]
    Fink, J., Mubin, O., Kaplan, F., & Dillenbourg, P. (2012). Anthropomorphic Language in Online Forums about Roomba, AIBO and the iPad. https://doi.org/10.0/Linux-x86_64
    [21]
    Fiorini, L., Rovini, E., Russo, S., Toccafondi, L., D’Onofrio, G., Cornacchia Loizzo, F. G., Bonaccorsi, M., Giuliani, F., Vignani, G., Sancarlo, D., Greco, A., & Cavallo, F. (2022). On the Use of Assistive Technology during the COVID-19 Outbreak: Results and Lessons Learned from Pilot Studies. Sensors, 22(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22176631
    [22]
    Forlizzi, J., & Disalvo, C. (2006). Service Robots in the Domestic Environment: A Study of the Roomba Vacuum in the Home. www.irobot.com
    [23]
    Fraser, K. C., Zeller, F., Smith, D. H., Mohammad, S. M., & Rudzicz, F. (2019). How do we feel when a robot dies? Emotions expressed on Twitter before and after hitchBOT’s destruction. https://pypi.org/project/langdetect/
    [24]
    Fraune, M. R., Langlois, D., Au, R. H. Y., Preusse, H., Rheman, M., Ling, K., & Tsui, K. M. (2022). With age comes technology wisdom: Across cultures, the effect of affinity for technology on group cohesion and mental health during social isolation depends on age. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4049530
    [25]
    Gonzalez-Jimenez, J., Galindo, C., & Gutierrez, C. (n.d.). Evaluation of a Telepresence Robot for the Elderly. A Spanish Experience. http://mapir.isa.uma.es
    [26]
    Heshmat, Y., Jones, B., Xiong, X., Neustaedter, C., Tang, A., Riecke, B. E., & Yang, L. (2018). Geocaching with a beam: Shared outdoor activities through a telepresence robot with 360 degree viewing. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 2018-April. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173933
    [27]
    Isabet, B., Pino, M., Lewis, M., Benveniste, S., & Rigaud, A. S. (2021). Social telepresence robots: A narrative review of experiments involving older adults before and during the covid-19 pandemic. In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (Vol. 18, Issue 7). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073597
    [28]
    Jamal, S., & Newbold, K. B. (2020). Factors associated with travel behavior of millennials and older adults: A scoping review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198236
    [29]
    King, N., Horrocks, C., & Brooks, J. (2019). Interviews in Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
    [30]
    Koceska, N., Koceski, S., Zobel, P. B., Trajkovik, V., & Garcia, N. (2019). A telemedicine robot system for assisted and independent living. Sensors (Switzerland), 19(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19040834
    [31]
    Kongkham, P. (2022, November 11). Senior care, OhmniLabs. https://ohmnilabs.com/seniorcare/
    [32]
    Korblet, V. M., Karreman, J., & Van Rompay, T. (2019). Master thesis The acceptance of mobile telepresence robots by elderly people THE ACCEPTANCE OF MOBILE TELEPRESENCE ROBOTS BY THE ELDERLY.
    [33]
    Krupp, M. M., Rueben, M., Grimm, C. M., & Smart, W. D. (2017). A Focus Group Study of Privacy Concerns about Telepresence Robots.
    [34]
    Lee, M. K., & Takayama, L. (2011). “Now, I have a body”: Uses and social norms for mobile remote presence in the workplace. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978950
    [35]
    Lim, J. (2023). Effects of a cognitive-based intervention program using social robot PIO on cognitive function, depression, loneliness, and quality of life of older adults living alone.
    [36]
    Ling, K., Langlois, D., Preusse, H., Rheman, J. M., Parson, D., Kuballa, S., Simecek, M., Tsui, K. M., & Fraune, M. R. (2023). “If you weren’t connected to the Internet, you were not alive”: experience of using social technology during COVID-19 in adults 50+. Frontiers in Public Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1177683
    [37]
    Ling, K. M., Langlois, D., Preusse, H., Fraune, M., & Tsui, K. M. (2022). Using Robots to Facilitate and Improve Social Interaction Between Humans: An Exploratory Qualitative Study with Adults 50+ in the US and Japan. 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 885–889. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889559
    [38]
    Loges, W. E., & Jung, J.-Y. (2001). COMMUNICATION RESEARCH • August 2001 Loges, Jung • Internet Connectedness and Age Exploring the Digital Divide Internet Connectedness and Age.
    [39]
    Mordor Intelligence. (n.d.). Telepresence Robot Market Size & Share Analysis - Growth Trends & Forecasts (2024-2029). Retrieved January 31, 2024, from https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/telepresence-robots-market
    [40]
    Moyle, W., Arnautovska, U., Ownsworth, T., & Jones, C. (2017). Potential of telepresence robots to enhance social connectedness in older adults with dementia: An integrative review of feasibility. In International Psychogeriatrics (Vol. 29, Issue 12, pp. 1951–1964). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610217001776
    [41]
    Moyle, W., Jones, C., Cooke, M., O’dwyer, S., Sung, B., & Drummond, S. (2014). Connecting the person with dementia and family: a feasibility study of a telepresence robot. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/14/7
    [42]
    Niemelä, M., van Aerschot, L., Tammela, A., & Aaltonen, I. (2017). A Telepresence Robot in Residential Care: Family Increasingly Present, Personnel Worried About Privacy (pp. 85–94). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_9
    [43]
    Niemelä, M., van Aerschot, L., Tammela, A., Aaltonen, I., & Lammi, H. (2021). Towards Ethical Guidelines of Using Telepresence Robots in Residential Care. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(3), 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00529-8
    [44]
    NIH. (2022, September 2). Age, National Institutes of Health. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.nih.gov/nih-style-guide/age
    [45]
    Peplau, L. A. (1985). Loneliness Research: Basic Concepts and Findings. In Social Support: Theory, Research and Applications (pp. 269–286). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5115-0_15
    [46]
    Pirhonen, J., Melkas, H., Laitinen, A., & Pekkarinen, S. (2020). Could robots strengthen the sense of autonomy of older people residing in assisted living facilities?—A future-oriented study. Ethics and Information Technology, 22(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-019-09524-z
    [47]
    Rodney, T., Josiah, N., & Baptiste, D. L. (2021). Loneliness in the time of COVID-19: Impact on older adults. In Journal of Advanced Nursing (Vol. 77, Issue 9, pp. e24–e26). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14856
    [48]
    Rosenthal-von der Pütten, A. M., Krämer, N. C., Hoffmann, L., Sobieraj, S., & Eimler, S. C. (2013). An Experimental Study on Emotional Reactions Towards a Robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-012-0173-8
    [49]
    Rosoff, M. (2015, October 16). Emerging Technologies: Why is tech getting cheaper? https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/why-is-tech-getting-cheaper/
    [50]
    Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Ferguson, M. L. (1978). Developing a measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42.3.
    [51]
    Saldaña, J. (2021). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. www.sagepublications.com
    [52]
    Schouten, A. P., Portegies, T. C., Withuis, I., Willemsen, L. M., & Mazerant-Dubois, K. (2022). Robomorphism: Examining the effects of telepresence robots on between-student cooperation. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, 106980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106980
    [53]
    Seelye, A. M., Wild, K. V., Larimer, N., Maxwell, S., Kearns, P., & Kaye, J. A. (2012). Reactions to a remote-controlled video-communication robot in seniors’ homes: A pilot study of feasibility and acceptance. Telemedicine and E-Health, 18(10), 755–759. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2012.0026
    [54]
    Shankar, A., McMunn, A., Banks, J., & Steptoe, A. (2011). Loneliness, social isolation, and behavioral and biological health indicators in older adults. Health Psychology, 30(4), 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022826
    [55]
    Shishehgar, M., Kerr, D., & Blake, J. (2019). The effectiveness of various robotic technologies in assisting older adults. Health Informatics Journal, 25(3), 892–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458217729729
    [56]
    Sung, J., Christensen, H. I., & Grinter, R. E. (2009). Robots in the Wild: Understanding Long-term Use. ACM.
    [57]
    Taylor, S. E., Repetti, R. L., & Seeman, T. (1997). HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY: What is an Unhealthy Environment and How Does It Get Under the Skin? In Annu. Rev. Psychol (Vol. 48).
    [58]
    Thoits, P. A. (1995). Stress, coping, and social suppoty processes- where are we? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Extra Issue, 53–79.
    [59]
    Toepoel, V. (2013). Ageing, Leisure, and Social Connectedness: How could Leisure Help Reduce Social Isolation of Older People? Social Indicators Research, 113(1), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0097-6
    [60]
    Tsai, T. C., Hsu, Y. L., Ma, A. I., King, T., & Wu, C. H. (2007). Developing a telepresence robot for interpersonal communication with the elderly in a home environment. Telemedicine and E-Health, 13(4), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2006.0068
    [61]
    Tsui, K. M., Desai, M., Yanco, H. A., & Uhlik, C. (2011). Exploring Use Cases for Telepresence Robots.
    [62]
    Tuli, T. B., Terefe, T. O., & Rashid, M. M. U. (2021). Telepresence Mobile Robots Design and Control for Social Interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(5), 877–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00676-3
    [63]
    Umberson, D., & Karas Montez, J. (2010). Social Relationships and Health: A Flashpoint for Health Policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(1_suppl), S54–S66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510383501
    [64]
    Van Baarsen, B., Snijders, T. A. B., Smit, J. H., & Van Dujin, M. A. J. (2001). LONELY BUT NOT ALONE: EMOTIONAL ISOLATION AND SOCIAL ISOLATION AS TWO DISTINCT DIMENSIONS OF LONELINESS IN OLDER PEOPLE. In Educational and Psychological Measurement (Vol. 61, Issue 1). Hansson.
    [65]
    Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
    [66]
    Verified Market Research. (2023, December). Global Telepresence Robot Market Size By Component (Head, Body), By Type (Stationary, Mobile), By Application (Education, Healthcare, Enterprise, Homecare), By Geographic Scope And Forecast. https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/telepresence-robot-market/
    [67]
    Vincent, G. K., & Velkoff, V. A. (2010). THE NEXT FOUR DECADES The Older Population in the United States: 2010 to 2050 Population Estimates and Projections Current Population Reports. www.census.gov/population/www
    [68]
    Williams, E. (1977). Experimental Comparisons of Face-to-Face and Mediated Communication: A Review. In Psychological Bulletin (Vol. 84, Issue 5).
    [69]
    Wilson, G., Gates, J. R., Vijaykumar, S., & Morgan, D. J. (2021). Understanding older adults’ use of social technology and the factors influencing use. Ageing and Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X21000490
    [70]
    Wu, X., Nix, L. C., Brummett, A. M., Aguillon, C., Oltman, D. J., & Beer, J. M. (2021). The design, development, and evaluation of telepresence interfaces for aging adults: Investigating user perceptions of privacy and usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 156, 102695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102695

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
    ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction Just Accepted
    EISSN:2573-9522
    Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Online AM: 11 July 2024
    Accepted: 30 May 2024
    Revised: 15 February 2024
    Received: 31 August 2023

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. mobile telepresence robots
    2. older adults
    3. longitudinal study
    4. social connection

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 13
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13
    Reflects downloads up to

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media