Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/375735.376436acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Using self-diagnosis to adapt organizational structures

Published: 28 May 2001 Publication History

Abstract

The specific organization used by a multi-agent system is crucial for its effectiveness and efficiency. In dynamic environments, or when the objectives of the system shift, the organization must therefore be able to change as well. In this paper we propose using a general diagnosis engine to drive this process of adaptation, using the \tems\ modeling language as the primary representation of organizational information. Results from experiments employing such a system in the Producer-Consumer-Transporter domain are also presented.

References

[1]
Ana L.C. Bazzan, Victor Lesser, and Ping Xuan. Adapting an Organization Design through Domain-Independent Diagnosis. Comp Sci Technical Report TR-98-014, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, February 1998.
[2]
Daniel D. Corkill and Victor R. Lesser. The use of meta-level control for coordination in a distributed problem solving network. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 748-755, Karlsruhe, Germany, August 1983.
[3]
Keith S. Decker and Victor R. Lesser. Quantitative modeling of complex environments. International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance, and Management, 2(4):215-234, December 1993. Special issue on "Mathematical and Computational Models of Organizations: Models and Characteristics of Agent Behavior".
[4]
Edmund H. Durfee and Thomas A. Montgomery. Coordination as distributed search in a hierarchical behavior space. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 21(6):1363-1378, 1991.
[5]
Bryan Horling and Victor Lesser. Using diagnosis to learn contextual coordination rules. In in Proceedings of the AAAI-99 Workshop on Reasoning in Context for AI Applications, a version also available as UMASS CS Tech Report TR99-15. AAAI, 1999.
[6]
Toru Ishida, Makoto Yokoo, and Les Gasser. An organizational approach to adaptive production systems. In National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-90), pages 52-58, 1990.
[7]
D. Jensen, M. Atighetchi, R. Vincent, and V. Lesser. Learning quantitative knowledge for multiagent coordination. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Orlando, FL, July 1999. AAAI.
[8]
Onn Shehory, Katia Sycara, Prasad Chalasani, and Somesh Jha. Agent cloning: An approach to agent mobility and resource allocation. IEEE Communications, 36(7):58-67, July 1998.
[9]
Y. So and E. H. Durfee. Modeling and designing computational organizations. In Working Notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Computational Organization Design, 1994.
[10]
T. Sugawara and V. Lesser. Learning control rules for coordination. In Multi-Agent and Cooperative Computation '93, pages 121-136, 1993.
[11]
Roy Turner and Elise Turner. Organization and reorganization of autonomous oceanographic sampling networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Interlational Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1998.
[12]
Thomas Wagner and Victor Lesser. Relating quantified motivations for organizationally situated agents. In N.R. Jennings and Y. Lesp' erance, editors, Intelligent Agents VI - Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-99), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Towards a New Approach for Controlling the Reorganization Process of Multi-Agent SystemsComputer Systems and Software Engineering10.4018/978-1-5225-3923-0.ch088(2068-2087)Online publication date: 2018
  • (2017)Empirical Evaluation of Similarity Coefficients for Multiagent Fault LocalizationIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems10.1109/TSMC.2016.252390547:5(767-782)Online publication date: May-2017
  • (2015)Towards next generation coordination infrastructuresThe Knowledge Engineering Review10.1017/S026988891500009030:04(435-453)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2015
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
AGENTS '01: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Autonomous agents
May 2001
662 pages
ISBN:158113326X
DOI:10.1145/375735
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 May 2001

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. organization and social structure
  2. organization self-design

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

AGENTS01
AGENTS01: Autonomous Agents 2001
Quebec, Montreal, Canada

Acceptance Rates

AGENTS '01 Paper Acceptance Rate 66 of 248 submissions, 27%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 182 of 599 submissions, 30%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 10 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Towards a New Approach for Controlling the Reorganization Process of Multi-Agent SystemsComputer Systems and Software Engineering10.4018/978-1-5225-3923-0.ch088(2068-2087)Online publication date: 2018
  • (2017)Empirical Evaluation of Similarity Coefficients for Multiagent Fault LocalizationIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems10.1109/TSMC.2016.252390547:5(767-782)Online publication date: May-2017
  • (2015)Towards next generation coordination infrastructuresThe Knowledge Engineering Review10.1017/S026988891500009030:04(435-453)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2015
  • (2014)Towards a New Approach for Controlling the Reorganization Process of Multi-Agent SystemsInternational Journal of Agent Technologies and Systems10.4018/ijats.20140401046:2(73-91)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2014
  • (2014)Advances in Fault-Tolerant Multi-Agent SystemsEncyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Third Edition10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch690(7006-7017)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2014
  • (2014)Plasticity in Network OrganizationsJournal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics10.20965/jaciii.2014.p056718:4(567-572)Online publication date: 20-Jul-2014
  • (2013)Robust Regulation Adaptation in Multi-Agent SystemsACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems10.1145/25173288:3(1-27)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2013
  • (2013)Multidimensional Adaptation in MAS OrganizationsIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics10.1109/TSMCB.2012.221359243:2(622-633)Online publication date: Apr-2013
  • (2012)Decentralized approaches for self-adaptation in agent organizationsACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems10.1145/2168260.21682617:1(1-28)Online publication date: 4-May-2012
  • (2012)Exception diagnosis in multiagent contract executionsAnnals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence10.1007/s10472-012-9282-164:1(73-107)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2012
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media