Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article
Free access

Channel selection and effective communication for managerial decision making

Published: 24 May 1984 Publication History
First page of PDF

References

[1]
ALLEN, T.J. The differential performance of information channels in the transfer of technology. In Factors in the Transfer of Technology. W.H. Gruber, and D.G. Marquis, Eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1969, 137-154.
[2]
ALLEN, T.J. Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the Research and Development Organization. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1977.
[3]
ALMSTEAD, F.E., AND GRAF, R.W. Talkback: The m~ssing ingredient. Audiovisual Instr. 5 (Apr. 1960), 110-112.
[4]
BAILEY, J.E., AND PEARSON, S.W. Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Manage. Sci. 29, 5 (May 1983), 530-545.
[5]
BALL, S., AND BOGATZ, G.A.The First Year of Sesame Street: An Evaluation. Education Testing Service, Princeton, N.J., 1971.
[6]
BUNYAN, J.A., CRIMMINS, J., AND MEAD, S. Beyond company studios. Video Syst. 4, 11 (Nov. 1978), 13-14.
[7]
CASTLE, C.H. Open-circuit television in postgraduate medical education. J. Med. Educ. 38 (Apr. 1963), 254-260.
[8]
CHAPANIS, A. The relevance of laboratory studies to practical situations. Ergonomics 10, 5 (Sept. 1967), 557-577.
[9]
CHAPANIS, A., OCHSMAN, R.B., PARRISH, R.N., AND WEEKS, G.D. Studies in interactive communication: I. The effects of four communication modes on the behavior of teams during cooperative problem solving. Hum. Factors 14, 6 (Dec. 1972), 487-509.
[10]
CHAPANIS, A., AND OVERBEY, C.M. Studies in interactive communication: III. Effects of similar and dissimilar communication channels and two interactive options on team problem solving. Perceptual and Motor Skills 38 (Apr. 1974), 343-374.
[11]
CULNAN, M.J., AND BAIR, J.H. Human communication needs and organizational productivity: The potential impact of office automation. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 34, 3 (May 1983), 215-221.
[12]
CYERT, R.M., AND MARCH, J.G. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1963.
[13]
DICKSON, G.W., SENN, J.A., AND CHERVANY, N.L. Research in management information systems: the Minnesota experiments. Manage. Sci. 23, 9 (May 1977), 913-923.
[14]
HERMINGHAUS, E.G. Large group instruction by television: An experiment. School Rev. 65, 2 (Summer 1957), 119-133.
[15]
IVES, B. Graphical user interfaces for business information systems. MIS Q. (Dec. 1982), 15- 47.
[16]
IVES, B., OLSON, M.H., AND BAROUDI, J.J. The measurement of user satisfaction. Commun. ACM 26, 10 (Oct. 1983), 785-793.
[17]
KERLINGER, F.N. Foundations of Behavioral Research. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1973.
[18]
KING, W.R., AND RODRIQUEZ, J.I. Evaluating management information systems. MIS Q. 2, 3 (Sept. 1978), 43-51.
[19]
KOZAR, K.A., AND DICKSON, G.W. An experimental study of the effects of data display media on decision effectiveness. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud 10 (1978), 495-505.
[20]
LARKER, D.F., AND LESSIG, V.P. Perceived usefulness of information: A psychometric examination. Decis. Sci. 11 (Jan. 1980), 121-134.
[21]
LUCAS, H.C. Why Information Systems Fail. Columbia University Press, New York, 1975.
[22]
LUCAS, H.C. Behavioral factors in system implementation. In Implementing Operations Research~Management Science, R.L. Schultz and D.P. Slevin, Eds., American Elsevier, New York, 1975.
[23]
LUCAS, H.C. Empirical evidence for a descriptive model of implementation. MIS Q. 2, 2 (June 1978), 27-52.
[24]
MELCHER, A.J., AND BELLER, R. Toward a theory of organization communication: Consideration in channel selection. Acad. Manage. J. 10, 1 (Mar. 1967), 39-53.
[25]
MENZEL, H. Review of Studies in the Flow of Information Among Scientists. Columbia University, Bureau of Applied Research, New York, 1960.
[26]
OLSON, M.H., AND LUCAS, H.C. The impact of office automation on the organization: Some implications for research. Commun. ACM 25, 11 {Nov. 1982), 838-847.
[27]
O'REILLY, C.A. Variations in decision makers' use of information sources: The impact of quality and accessibility of information. Acad. Manage. J. 25, 4 (1982), 756-771.
[28]
PICOT, A., KLINGENBERG, H., AND KRANZLE, H. Office technology: A report on attitudes and channel selection from field studies in Germany. Commun. Year Book 6, (1982), 674-692.
[29]
POPPEL, J.L. The effects of three methods of instruction on task performance. In Proceedings of the Academy of Management (1977), 380-390.
[30]
ROBEY, D. Attitudinal correlates of MIS use. In Proceedings, National AIDS Meeting 10 (1978), 170-172.
[31]
ROBEY, D., AND ZELLER, R.F. Factors affecting the success and failure of an information system for product quality. Interfaces 8, 2 (Feb. 1978), 70-78.
[32]
RUSH, M.C., PHILIPS, J.S., AND PANEK, P.E. Subject recruitment bias: The paid volunteer subject. Perceptual and Motor Skills 47, 2 (Oct. 1978), 443-449.
[33]
SALMANS, S. The debate over the electronic office. New York Times Mag. (Nov. 14, 1982), 130, 132, 134-137, 157.
[34]
SEWARD, H.H. Evaluating information systems. In The Information Systems Handbook, W. McFarlan and R. Nolan, Eds., Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, Ill., 1975.
[35]
SWANSON, E.B. Measuring user attitudes in MIS research: A review. Omega 10, 2 (1982), 157- 165.
[36]
TALBURT, L. TV as a corporate management tool. Public Relations J. 39, 9 (Sept. 1979), 15-16, 21.
[37]
VAN VALKENBURG, G. QUICKSCAN electronic publishing--a practical broadband information system. Presented at the Pacific Telecommunications Conference (Honolulu, Jan. 19, 1983).
[38]
VEITH, R.H. Teletext vs. on-line, video and print. In Proceedings of the National On-Line Meeting. Learned Information, Inc., Medford, N.J., 1983, 561-566.
[39]
WATSON, C.J., AND DRXVER, R.W. The influence of computer graphics on the recall of information. MIS Q. 7, 1 (Mar. 1983), 45-53.
[40]
ZMUD, R.W.- An empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the concept of information. Decis. Sci, 9. 4 {Apr. 1978}. 187-195.
[41]
ZMUD, R.W. Individual differences and MIS success: A review of the empirical literature. Manage. Sci. 25, 10 (Oct. 1979), 966-979.

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)More that unites than divides: intergenerational communication preferences in the workplaceCommunication Research and Practice10.1080/22041451.2017.12752593:4(358-385)Online publication date: 14-Feb-2017
  • (2007)Predicting the usage of an advanced communication technologyBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/014492985089018114:4(327-335)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2007
  • (1994)A survey and critique of the impacts of information technologyInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/0268-4012(94)90031-014:2(122-133)Online publication date: 1-Apr-1994
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Reviews

Peter M. Hahn

This paper describes a scientifically executed and carefully documented study of the communication effectiveness of three types of media: electronic mail, videotape, and paper. The introduction gives a good review of recent research on the effectiveness of electronic forms of media in the management and scientific communities. The study compares the use of the three media forms for conveying business information. The subjects were 104 MBA students enrolled in an introductory MIS course. Results of the study indicate that the three forms rate equally well on the average in terms of information retained, as well as quality of decisions based on that information. However, videotape, in some cases, was much bettern and, in some cases, much worse than the other two forms in effectively transferring information.

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 2, Issue 2
April 1984
92 pages
ISSN:1046-8188
EISSN:1558-2868
DOI:10.1145/521
  • Editor:
  • John O. Limb
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 May 1984
Published in TOIS Volume 2, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)97
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
Reflects downloads up to 03 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)More that unites than divides: intergenerational communication preferences in the workplaceCommunication Research and Practice10.1080/22041451.2017.12752593:4(358-385)Online publication date: 14-Feb-2017
  • (2007)Predicting the usage of an advanced communication technologyBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/014492985089018114:4(327-335)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2007
  • (1994)A survey and critique of the impacts of information technologyInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/0268-4012(94)90031-014:2(122-133)Online publication date: 1-Apr-1994
  • (1989)Computers and commitment to a public management decision: An experimentKnowledge in Society10.1007/BF026872062:3(42-56)Online publication date: May-1989
  • (1987)Message equivocality, media selection and manager performance: implications for information systemsMIS Quarterly10.2307/24868211:3(355-366)Online publication date: 1-Sep-1987
  • (1986)The effect of a priori views on the social implications of computing: the case of office automationACM Computing Surveys10.1145/7474.747618:2(165-195)Online publication date: 1-Jun-1986

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media