Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/544414.544427acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Do cognitive styles affect learning performance in different computer media?

Published: 24 June 2002 Publication History

Abstract

The impact of three treatments Text, CD-ROM, Internet site and student Cognitive Styles on learning performance was investigated. Prior to the commencement of the course the students completed the following psychometric tests: the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) [1], Kirton's Adaptive-Innovator Inventory (KAI) [2] and Cognitive Styles Analysis (CSA) [3]. The subject matter was an Introductory Course in Artificial Intelligence. Forty-seven final year Information System students participated, randomly assigned within sexes to one of the three treatments. Upon completion of six one-hour sessions they were given a sixty-minute examination to assess overall learning.It was found that only Field Dependence-Field Independence interacted with overall learning performance at a statistically significant level (p 0.001) irrespective of treatment. When the three treatments were investigated separately the results suggest that Verbalisers performed better than Imagers in the Internet treatment, while the Analytics performed better than the Wholists in the CD-ROM treatment. The results of the study are discussed in terms of individual differences (Cognitive Styles) together with implications for Web site design.

References

[1]
Witkin, M.A., Oltman, P., Raskin, E., Karp, S. (1971). A Manual for the Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
[2]
Kirton, M.J. (1976) Adaptors and Innovators:a description and measure, Journal of Applied Psychology 61, 622--9.
[3]
Riding R.J. (1991) Cognitive Styles Analysis, Birmingham. Learning and Training Technology.
[4]
Sternberg, R.J. & Grigorenko (1997) Are Cognitive styles still in style? American Psychologist Vol 52, No. 7, p700--712.
[5]
Bruner, J.S. (1962). On Knowing: Essays for the left hand. P87 Cambridge, Mass; Harvard University Press.
[6]
Jonassen, D.M. (1989). Hypertext and hypermedia. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications.
[7]
Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. Atlantic Monthly, 76, 101--108.
[8]
Allport, G.W. (1937). Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. New York Holt and Co.
[9]
Riding, R.J. & Rayner, S. (1998) Cognitive styles and learning Learning Strategies, London. David Futton, p8, p98--p116.
[10]
Witkin, H., Moore, C., Goodenough, D., Cox, P. (1977) Field dependent and field cognitive styles and their educational implications.Review of Educational Research, 47, 1--64.
[11]
Jonassen, D.M. & Grabowski, B.L. (1993) Handbook of individual differences: Learning and Instruction, Hillsdale, N.J. Laurence Erlbaum.
[12]
Post, Paul E. (1987). The effect of field independence and field dependence on computer assisted instruction achievement. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education V25, n2, p60--67, Fall 1987.
[13]
Wey, P., Waugh, M.L. (1993). The effects of different interface presentation modes and users' individual differences on users' hypertext information access performance. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, Georgia.
[14]
Repman, J. Weller, H.G & Lan, W. (1993) The impact of social context on learning in hypermedia-based instruction .Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 2 283--298.
[15]
Weller Herman G., Repman, J., William, L and G. Rooze (1995). Improving the effectiveness of learning through Hypermedia and based instruction. The Importance of Learner Characteristics. Computers in Human Behaviour, Vol 11, No. 3-4, pp 451--465.
[16]
Wang, S.R. and Jonassen, D.H. (1993). Investigating the effects of individual differences on performance in cognitive flexibility hypertexts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta Georgia.
[17]
Riding, R.J. & Douglas, G. (1993).The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology 63, 297--307.
[18]
Riding, R.J., Watts, M. (1997). The effect of cognitive style on the preferred format of instructional material. Educational Psychology 17, 179--183.
[19]
Riding,R.J., Sadler-Smith, E. (1992) Type of instructional material, cognitive style and learning performance, Educational Studies 18, 323--40.
[20]
Riding, R.J. & Grimley, M. (1999). Cognitive style and learning from multimedia materials in 11 year old children. British Journal of Educational Technology 30, 43--56.
[21]
Sternberg, R J (1997) Thinking Styles Cambridge University Press UK.
[22]
Goldstein, K.M. & Blackman, S. (1978). Cognitive Styles, New York, Wiley.
[23]
Mac Leod, C.M. Jackson, R.A. and Palmer J.(1986) On the relation between spatial ability and field dependence .Intelligence 10 (2), 141-151.
[24]
Kirton,M.J (1987) Kirton Adaption-Innovators Inventory (KAI) Manual, 2nd ed. Hatfield UK:Occupational Research Centre.
[25]
Tech.Rep. {2002} Parkinson, A.P., Redmond, J.A "TCD CS-2002-18 Results from a study on the affects of Cognitive Styles on Learning performance in 3 different computer environments". Apr 2002 Computer Sc Dept Trinity College Dublin Ireland.
[26]
Papert, S (1996) The Connected Family - Bridging the Generation Gap. Longstreet Press Inc. USA p47.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Cognitive Style’s Effects on User Task Performance in Network VisualisationsDiagrammatic Representation and Inference10.1007/978-3-030-86062-2_45(439-442)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2021
  • (2008)Cognitive styles, dynamic geometry and measurement performanceEducational Studies in Mathematics10.1007/s10649-008-9139-z70:1(5-26)Online publication date: 21-Aug-2008
  • (2005)User cognitive style and interface design for personal, adaptive learning. what to model?Proceedings of the 10th international conference on User Modeling10.1007/11527886_20(154-163)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2005
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ITiCSE '02: Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
June 2002
262 pages
ISBN:1581134991
DOI:10.1145/544414
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 June 2002

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. GEFT
  2. KAI
  3. cognitive styles
  4. learning performance
  5. riding's CSA

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

ITiCSE02
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

ITiCSE '02 Paper Acceptance Rate 42 of 100 submissions, 42%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Cognitive Style’s Effects on User Task Performance in Network VisualisationsDiagrammatic Representation and Inference10.1007/978-3-030-86062-2_45(439-442)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2021
  • (2008)Cognitive styles, dynamic geometry and measurement performanceEducational Studies in Mathematics10.1007/s10649-008-9139-z70:1(5-26)Online publication date: 21-Aug-2008
  • (2005)User cognitive style and interface design for personal, adaptive learning. what to model?Proceedings of the 10th international conference on User Modeling10.1007/11527886_20(154-163)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2005
  • (2004)Work in progress - the study of web-based adaptive feedback based on the analysis of individual differences34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004.10.1109/FIE.2004.1408491(188-189)Online publication date: 2004
  • (2003)Architecture to support dynamic composition of math lesson plansProceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Applied computing10.1145/952532.952645(569-574)Online publication date: 9-Mar-2003
  • (2003)Managing the Interactivity of Instructional Format and Cognitive Style Construct in Web-Mediated Learning EnvironmentsAdvances in Web-Based Learning - ICWL 200310.1007/978-3-540-45200-3_29(308-319)Online publication date: 2003
  • (2020)A Goal Oriented Approach for Solving Mathematical Multi-step Word ProblemsProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Systems and Technologies10.1145/3447568.3448549(1-7)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2020
  • (2015)Digital Textbook Program in Malaysia: Lessons from South KoreaPublishing Research Quarterly10.1007/s12109-015-9425-431:4(244-257)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2015
  • (2012)A Cognitive Analysis When the Students Solve ProblemsCreative Education10.4236/ce.2012.3406303:04(400-405)Online publication date: 2012
  • (2010)Web-based interactionInternational Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.02.00930:5(379-387)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2010
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media