Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/563340.563453acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

How to develop and grade an exam for 20,000 students (or maybe just 200 or 20)

Published: 27 February 2002 Publication History

Abstract

Although our students may spend only a class period working one of our exams, as instructors, we invest many more hours crafting the questions and grading their responses. How do we ensure our time is well-spent? What qualities contribute to an effective exam? How can we guarantee a fair evaluation of student performance?With an 18-year track record delivering a nationwide exam, the Advanced Placement Computer Science (AP CS) program has a wealth of experience in the area of exam development and administration. This special session will bring together members of the AP CS Development Committee and the Educational Testing Service to share some of their insights into how the experts do it.AP teachers will learn more about the exam for which they are preparing their students. College faculty will gain a better understanding of the metrics provided by the AP exam. All instructors will come away with practical and transferable ideas for successful exam tactics.

Cited By

View all
  • (2012)FLOP, a free laboratory of programmingProceedings of the 12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research10.1145/2401796.2401807(93-99)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2012
  • (2011)Criteria for writing exams which reflect the k12 CS foundations study materialProceedings of the 5th international conference on Informatics in Schools: situation, Evolution and Perspectives10.1007/978-3-642-24722-4_20(225-235)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2011
  • (2008)Testing-Based Automatic GradingProceedings of the 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies10.1109/ICALT.2008.224(847-849)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2008
  • Show More Cited By
  1. How to develop and grade an exam for 20,000 students (or maybe just 200 or 20)

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGCSE '02: Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
    February 2002
    471 pages
    ISBN:1581134738
    DOI:10.1145/563340
    • cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
      ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 34, Issue 1
      Inroads: paving the way towards excellence in computing education
      March 2002
      417 pages
      ISSN:0097-8418
      DOI:10.1145/563517
      Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 27 February 2002

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    SIGCSE02
    Sponsor:
    SIGCSE02: The 33rd Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
    February 27 - March 3, 2002
    Kentucky, Cincinnati

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGCSE '02 Paper Acceptance Rate 73 of 234 submissions, 31%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

    Upcoming Conference

    SIGCSE Virtual 2024
    1st ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
    December 5 - 8, 2024
    Virtual Event , NC , USA

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2012)FLOP, a free laboratory of programmingProceedings of the 12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research10.1145/2401796.2401807(93-99)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2012
    • (2011)Criteria for writing exams which reflect the k12 CS foundations study materialProceedings of the 5th international conference on Informatics in Schools: situation, Evolution and Perspectives10.1007/978-3-642-24722-4_20(225-235)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2011
    • (2008)Testing-Based Automatic GradingProceedings of the 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies10.1109/ICALT.2008.224(847-849)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2008
    • (2006)The back end of a grading systemACM SIGCSE Bulletin10.1145/1124706.112136038:1(56-60)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2006
    • (2006)The back end of a grading systemProceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education10.1145/1121341.1121360(56-60)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2006

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media