Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/587078.587080acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

What is chat doing in the workplace?

Published: 16 November 2002 Publication History

Abstract

We report an empirical study of a synchronous messaging application with group-oriented functionality designed to support teams in the workplace. In particular, the tool supports group chat windows that allow members of a group to communicate with text that persists for about a day. We describe the experience of 6 globally-distributed work groups who used the tool over a period of 17 months. An analysis of use shows that the group functionality was used primarily for bursts of synchronous conversations and occasional asynchronous exchanges. The content was primarily focused on work tasks, and negotiating availability, with a smattering of non-work topics and humor. Nearly all groups were remarkably similar in the content of their group chat, although the research group chatted far more frequently than the others. We conclude with suggestions for future research, and a discussion of the place of team-oriented synchronous messaging tools in the workplace.

References

[1]
Abel, M. J., Experiences in an Exploratory Distributed Organization, in Intellectual Teamwork: Social Foundations of Cooperative Work, J. Galegher, R.E. Kraut, and C. Egido, Editors. 1990, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 489--510.
[2]
T. J. Allen, Managing the Flow of Technology. 1977, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[3]
Begole, J., Tang, J.C., Smith, R.E., & Yankelovich, N. Work rhythms: Analyzing visualizations of awareness histories of distributed groups. In CSCW'02, 2002, New Orleans, LA.
[4]
Boyer, David, Cortes, M., & Handel, M. Presence Awareness Tools for Virtual Enterprises. In OOPSLA 1998, Virtual Enterprise Workshop. Available at: http://www.research.avayalabs.com/project/RVM/OOPSLA_workshop-final1.doc
[5]
Bradner, E., Kellogg, W.A., & Erickson, T. The adoption and use of 'Babble': A field study of chat in the workplace, ECSCW'99, 1999, Copenhagen, 139--158.
[6]
Cairncross, F. The Death of Distance: Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
[7]
Carmel, E. Global Software Teams. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.
[8]
Churchill, E. F. and S. Bly. It's all in the words: Supporting work activities with lightweight tools. In GROUP'99. 1999. Phoenix, AZ, 40--49.
[9]
Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 1960, 37--46.
[10]
Dourish, P. and S. Bly. Portholes: Supporting Awareness in a Distributed Work Group. In CHI'92, 1992. Monterey, CA, 541--547.
[11]
Fish, R. S., et al. Evaluating Video as a Technology for Informal Communication. In CHI'92, 1992. Monterey, CA, 37--48.
[12]
Herbsleb, J.D., Atkins, D., Boyer, D.G., Handel, M., & Finholt, T.A., Introducing Instant Messaging and Chat into the Workplace. In CHI'02, 2002, Minneapolis, MN, 171--178.
[13]
Herbsleb, J. D., Klein, H., Olson, G. M., Brunner, H., Olson, J. S., & Harding, J. Object-oriented analysis and design in software project teams. Human Computer Interaction, 10(2-3), 1995, 249--292.
[14]
Herbsleb, J.D., Mockus, A., Finholt, T.A., & Grinter, R.E. An Empirical Study of Global Software Development: Distance and Speed. In International Conference on Software Engineering, 2001, Toronto, Canada, May 15-18, 81--90.
[15]
Hindus, D., et al. Thunderwire: A field study of an audio-only media space. In CSCW'96. 1996, Boston, MA, 238--247.
[16]
Hudson, J., Christensen, J., Kellogg, W., & Erickson, T. 'I'd Be Overwhelmed, But it's Just One More Thing to Do:' Availability and Interruption in Research Management, In CHI'02. 2002 Minneapolis, MN, 97--104.
[17]
Isaacs, E., Walendowski, A., & Ranganthan, D. Hubbub: A sound-enhanced mobile instant messenger that supports awareness and opportunistic interactions. In CHI'02, 2002 Minneapolis, MN, 179--186.
[18]
Kaynay, J. Contexts of Uninhibited Online Behavior: Flaming in Social Newsgroups on Usenet in Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49(12), 1998, 1135--1141.
[19]
Kiesler, S. and Sproull, L. Group Decision Making and Communication Technology in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52(1), 1992, 96--123.
[20]
Kraut, R. E., C. Egido, & J. Galegher, Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaborations, in Intellectual Teamwork: Social Foundations of Cooperative Work, J. Galegher, R.E. Kraut, and C. Egido, Editors. 1990, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 149--172.
[21]
Kraut, R.E., Fish, R.S., Root, R.W., & Chalfonte, B.L. Informal communication in organizations: Form, function, and technology. In S. Oskamp & S. Spacapan (Eds.), People's Reactions to Technology, 1990, Newberry Park: Sage, 145--199.
[22]
Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 1977, 159--174.
[23]
Nardi, B., Whittaker and S., Bradner, E. Interaction and Outeraction: Instant Messaging in Action. CSCW'00, 2000, Philadelphia, PA, 79--88.
[24]
Obata, A. and K. Sasaki. OfficeWalker: A virtual visiting system based on proxemics. CSCW'98. 1998, Seattle, WA, 1-10.
[25]
O'Hara-Devereaux, M. and Johansen, R. Globalwork: Bridging Distance, Culture, and Time. 1994, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[26]
Olson, G. M. and J. S. Olson. Distance Matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2/3), 2000, 139--179.
[27]
Olson, J.S., Olson, G.M., Storrøsten, M., & Carter, M. Groupwork up close: A comparison of the group design process with and without a simple group editor ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 11(4), 1993, 321--348.
[28]
Putnam, Robert D., Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. 2000, New York: Touchstone Books.
[29]
Reinig, B, Briggs, R, & Nunamaker, J., "Flaming in the Electronic Classroom" in Journal of Management Information Systems 14(3), 1997, 45--59.
[30]
Slatalla, M., The office meeting that never ends. New York Times, Sept. 23, 1999.
[31]
Tang, John C., Yankelovich, N., Begole, James, et. al. ConNexus to Awarenex: Extending awareness to mobile users. CHI'01, 2001, Seattle, WA, 221--228.
[32]
Whittaker, S., Frohlich, D., & Daly-Jones, O. Informal workplace communication: What is it like and how might we support it? CHI'94, 1994, Boston, MA, 131--137.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Circle Back Next Week: The Effect of Meeting-Free Weeks on Distributed Workers’ Unstructured Time and Attention NegotiationProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642175(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)Youths' Usage of an Informal Chatting Tool in an After-school 3D Print ShopProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35795947:CSCW1(1-20)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Your mileage may vary: Case study of a robotic telepresence pilot roll-out for a hybrid knowledge work organisationExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3573871(1-7)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CSCW '02: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
November 2002
396 pages
ISBN:1581135602
DOI:10.1145/587078
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 November 2002

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. MUD
  2. awareness
  3. chat
  4. groupware
  5. instant messaging
  6. presence
  7. teams

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

CSCW02
CSCW02: Computer Supported Cooperative Work
November 16 - 20, 2002
Louisiana, New Orleans, USA

Acceptance Rates

CSCW '02 Paper Acceptance Rate 39 of 193 submissions, 20%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CSCW '24

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)72
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
Reflects downloads up to 18 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Circle Back Next Week: The Effect of Meeting-Free Weeks on Distributed Workers’ Unstructured Time and Attention NegotiationProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642175(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)Youths' Usage of an Informal Chatting Tool in an After-school 3D Print ShopProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35795947:CSCW1(1-20)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Your mileage may vary: Case study of a robotic telepresence pilot roll-out for a hybrid knowledge work organisationExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3573871(1-7)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)What makes IM users (un)responsive: An empirical investigation for understanding IM responsivenessInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102983172(102983)Online publication date: Apr-2023
  • (2023)A noise blocking methodology for effective collaborationSoftware: Practice and Experience10.1002/spe.3304Online publication date: 20-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Global software engineering in the age of GitHub and zoomJournal of Software: Evolution and Process10.1002/smr.234735:6Online publication date: 1-Jun-2023
  • (2022)User Perceptions of Security and Privacy for Group ChatDigital Threats: Research and Practice10.1145/34912653:2(1-29)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2022
  • (2022)Exploring the Use of Chatrooms by Developers: An Empirical Study on Slack and GitterIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2021.310961748:10(3988-4001)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2022
  • (2021)Context-based Automated Responses of Unavailability in Mobile MessagingComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)10.1007/s10606-021-09399-z30:3(307-349)Online publication date: 25-May-2021
  • (2020)Understanding User Perceptions of Security and Privacy for Group Chat: A Survey of Users in the US and UKProceedings of the 36th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference10.1145/3427228.3427275(234-248)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media