Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article
Free access

The performance of multiversion concurrency control algorithms

Published: 01 September 1986 Publication History

Abstract

A number of multiversion concurrency control algorithms have been proposed in the past few years. These algorithms use previous versions of data items in order to improve the level of achievable concurrency. This paper describes a simulation study of the performance of several multiversion concurrency control algorithms, investigating the extent to which they provide increases in the level of concurrency and also the CPU, I/O, and storage costs resulting from the use of multiple versions. The multiversion algorithms are compared with regard to performance with their single-version counterparts and also with each other. It is shown that each multiversion algorithm offers significant performance improvements despite the additional disk accesses involved in accessing old versions of data; the nature of the improvement depends on the algorithm in question. It is also shown that the storage overhead for maintaining old versions that may be required by ongoing transactions is not all that large under most circumstances. Finally, it is demonstrated that it is important for version maintenance to be implemented efficiently, as otherwise the cost of maintaining old versions could outweigh their concurrency benefits.

References

[1]
AGRAWAL, R., CAREY, M., AND LIVNY, M. Models for studying concurrency control performance: Alternatives and implications. In Proceedings of the A CM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (Austin, Tex., May 28-30). 1985.
[2]
BAYER, R., HELLER, H., AND REISER, A. Parallelism and' recovery in database systems. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 5, 2 (June 1980), 139-156.
[3]
BERNSTEIN, P. A., AND GOODMAN, N. Concurrency control in distributed database systems. ACM Comput. Surv. 13, 2 (June 1981), 185-221.
[4]
BERNSTEIN, P. i., AND GOODMAN, N. Multiversion concurrency control--Theory and algorithms. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 8, 4 (Dec. 1983), 465-483.
[5]
BRYANT, R. SIMPAS--A simulation language based on PASCAL. Tech. Rep. 390, Computer Sciences Dept., Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, June 1980.
[6]
CAREY, M. Modeling and evaluation of database concurrency control algorithms. Ph.D. dissertation, Computer Science Div. (EECS), Univ. of California, Berkeley, Aug. 1983.
[7]
CAREV, M. Multiple versions and the performance of optimistic concurrency control. Tech. Rep. 517, Computer Sciences Dept., Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, Oct. 1983.
[8]
CAREY, M., AND STONEBRAKER, M. The performance of concurrency control algorithms for database management systems. In Proceedings of the I Oth International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (Singapore, Aug.). VLDB Foundation, 1984.
[9]
CHAN, A., AND GRAY, R. Implementing distributed read-only transactions. IEEE Trans. So{tw. Eng~ SE-11, 2 (Feb. 1985).
[10]
CHris, A., DAVAL, U., AND HSU, M. Providing database management capabilities for mission critical applications. Paper presented at the International Workshop on High-Performance Transaction Processing Systems (Asilomar, Calif., Sept.). IEEE, New York, 1985.
[11]
CtiAN, A., FOX, S., LIN, W., NORI, A., AND RIES, D. The implementation of an integrated concurrency control and recovery scheme. In Proceedings of the A CM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (Orlando, Fla., june 2-4). ACM, New York, 1982.
[12]
DATE, C. An Introduction to Database Systems (Vol. II). Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1982.
[13]
DuBOURD,EU, D. Implementation of distributed transactions. In Proceedings of the 6th Berkeley Workshop on Distributed Data Management and Computer Networks. 1982.
[14]
GRAY, J. Notes on database operating systems. In Operating Systems: An Advanced Course, R. Bayer, R. Graham, and G. Seegmuller, Eds. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1979.
[15]
GRAY, J., MCJONES, P., BLASGEN, M., LINDSAY, B., LORIE, R., PRICE, T., PUTZOLU, F., AND TRAIGER, I. The recovery manager of the system R database manager. ACM Comput. Surv. 13, 2 (June 1981), 223-242.
[16]
KUNG, H. T., AND ROBINSON, J. T. On optimistic methods for concurrency control. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 6, 2 (June 1981), 213-226.
[17]
LAI, M., AND WILKINSON, W. Distributed transaction management in JASMIN. In Proceedings of the lOth International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (Singapore, Aug.). VLDB Foundation, 1984.
[18]
LIN, W., AND NOLTE, J. Basic timestamp, multiple version timestamp, and two-phase locking. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (Florence, Italy). VLDB Foundation, 1983.
[19]
LIN, W., AND NOLTE, J. Performance of distributed concurrency control. In Distributed Database Control and Allocation. Final Tech. Rep., vol. 2, Computer Corporation of America, Cambridge, Mass., 1983.
[20]
LIVNY, M., KHOSHAFIAN, S., AND BORAL, H. Multi-disk management algorithms. Paper presented at the International Workshop on High-Performance Transaction Processing Systems (Asilomar, Calif., Sept.). 1985. (Also MCC Tech. Rep., Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation, Austin, Tex., Dec. 1985.)
[21]
PAPADIMITRIOU, C., AND KANELAKIS, P. On concurrency control by multiple versions. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 9, 1 (Mar. 1984), 89-99.
[22]
PEINL, P., AND REUTER, A. Empirical comparison of database concurrency control schemes. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (Florence, Italy). VLDB Foundation, 1983.
[23]
REED, D. Naming and synchronization in a decentralized computer system. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, MIT, Cambridge, Mass., 1978.
[24]
REED, D.P. Implementing atomic actions on decentralized data. A CM Trans. Comput. Sys. 1, 1 {Feb. 1983), 3-23.
[25]
RIES, D. The effects of concurrency control on database management system performance. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Univ. of California at Berkeley, 1979.
[26]
RIES, D. R., kND STONEBRAKER, M. Effects of locking granularity on database management system. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2, 3 (Sept. 1977), 233-246.
[27]
RIEs, D. R., AND STONEBRAKER, M.R. Locking granularity revisited. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 4, 2 (June 1979), 210-227.
[28]
ROBINSON, J. Design of concurrency controls for transaction processing systems. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Computer Science, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pa., 1982.
[29]
ROOME, W. A content-addressabIe intelligent store. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 61, 9 (Nov. 1982).
[30]
SARGENT, R. Statistical analysis of simulation output data. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on the Simulation o{ Computer Systems. National Bureau of Standards, Boulder, Colo., 1976.
[31]
STEARNS, R., AND ROSENKRANTZ, D. Distributed database concurrency controls using beforevalues. In Proceedings of the A CM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (Ann Arbor, Mich., Apr. 29-May 1). ACM, New York, 1981.
[32]
ULLMAN, J. Principles of Database Systems, 2nd ed. Computer Science Press, Rockville, Md., 1983.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)RCBench: an RDMA-enabled transaction framework for analyzing concurrency control algorithmsThe VLDB Journal — The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases10.1007/s00778-023-00821-033:2(543-567)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
  • (2023)OceanBase Paetica: A Hybrid Shared-Nothing/Shared-Everything Database for Supporting Single Machine and Distributed ClusterProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3611540.361156016:12(3728-3740)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Opportunities for Quantum Acceleration of Databases: Optimization of Queries and Transaction SchedulesProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3598581.359860316:9(2344-2353)Online publication date: 1-May-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 September 1986
Published in TOCS Volume 4, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)85
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)RCBench: an RDMA-enabled transaction framework for analyzing concurrency control algorithmsThe VLDB Journal — The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases10.1007/s00778-023-00821-033:2(543-567)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
  • (2023)OceanBase Paetica: A Hybrid Shared-Nothing/Shared-Everything Database for Supporting Single Machine and Distributed ClusterProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3611540.361156016:12(3728-3740)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Opportunities for Quantum Acceleration of Databases: Optimization of Queries and Transaction SchedulesProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3598581.359860316:9(2344-2353)Online publication date: 1-May-2023
  • (2023)CSMV: A highly scalable multi-versioned software transactional memory for GPUsJournal of Parallel and Distributed Computing10.1016/j.jpdc.2023.04.002180(104701)Online publication date: Oct-2023
  • (2022)Memory-optimized multi-version concurrency control for disk-based database systemsProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3551793.355183215:11(2797-2810)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2022
  • (2019)On Transactional Concurrency ControlSynthesis Lectures on Data Management10.2200/S00912ED2V01Y201904DTM05914:5(1-404)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2019
  • (2018)An improved algorithm for database concurrency controlInternational Journal of Information Technology10.1007/s41870-018-0240-y11:1(21-30)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2018
  • (2017)An empirical evaluation of in-memory multi-version concurrency controlProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3067421.306742710:7(781-792)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017
  • (2016)On the Use of Abstract Models for RDF/S ProvenanceLinked Data Management10.1201/b16859-26(419-440)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2016
  • (2015)SynchronisationsverfahrenVerteiltes und Paralleles Datenmanagement10.1007/978-3-642-45242-0_12(253-284)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2015
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media