Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/964442.964480acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Implicit user profiling for on demand relevance feedback

Published: 13 January 2004 Publication History

Abstract

In the area of information retrieval and information filtering, relevance feedback is a popular technique which searches similar documents based on the documents browsed by the user. If the user wants to conduct relevance feedback on demand, which means the user wants to see similar documents while reading a document, the existing user profiling techniques cannot acquire keywords in high precision that the user is interested in at such a short time. This paper proposes a method for extracting text parts which the user might be interested in from the whole text of the Web page based on the user's mouse operation in the Web browser. The objective of this research is to (1) find what kind of mouse operation represent users' interests, (2) see the effectiveness of the found mouse operation in selecting keywords, and (3) compare our method with tf-idf, which is the most fundamental method used in many user profiling systems. From the user experiment, the precision to select keywords of our method is about 1.4 times compared with that of tf-idf.

References

[1]
Broder, A., et al.: Graph Structure in the Web, Proc. of the Ninth International World Wide Web Conference, In Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, Vol. 33, pp. 309--320 (2000).
[2]
Salton, G.: Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis, and Retrieval of Information by Computer, Addison Wesley (1989).
[3]
Resnick, P., et al.: Recommender Systems, Comm. of the ACM, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 56--89 (1997).
[4]
Belkin, N. J. and Croftk, W. B.: Information Filtering and Information Retrieval: Two Sides of the Same Coin?, Comm. of the ACM, Vol. 35, No. 12, pp. 29--38 (1992).
[5]
Sugimoto, M.: User Modeling and Adaptive Interaction in Information Gathering Systems, Journal of Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 25--32 (1999).
[6]
Mulvenna, M.D., Anand, S.S., Buchner, A.G.: Personalization on the Net using Web Mining, Comm. of the ACM, Vol. 43, No. 8, pp. 123--125 (2000).
[7]
Shardanand, U. and Maes, P.: Social Information Filtering: Algorithm for Automating 'Word of Mouth', Proc. of CHI'95, pp. 210--217 (1995).
[8]
Yan, T. W. and Garcia-Molina, H.: SIFT - A Tool for Wide-Area Information Dissemination, Proc. of 1995 USENIX Technical Conference, pp. 177--186 (1995).
[9]
Resnick, P., et al.: GroupLens : An Open Architecture for Collaborative Filtering of Netnews, Proc. of CSCW'94, pp. 175--186 (1994).
[10]
Pazzani, M. and Billsus, D.: Learning and Revising User Profiles: the Identification of Interesting Web Sites, Machine Learning, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 313--331 (1997).
[11]
Lang, K.: NewsWeeder: Learning to Filter NetNews, Proc. of ICML'95, pp. 331--339 (1994).
[12]
Smyth, B. and Cotter, P.: A Personalized Television Listings Service, Comm. of the ACM, Vol. 43, No. 8, pp. 107--111 (2000).
[13]
Kantor, P.B., et. al: Capturing Human Intelligence in the Net, Comm. of the ACM, Vol. 43, No. 8, pp. 112--115 (2000).
[14]
Morita, M. and Shinoda, Y.: Information Filtering Based on User Behavior Analysis and Best Match Text Retrieval, Proc. of the 17th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 272--281 (1994).
[15]
Sakagami, H. and Kamba, T.: Learning Personal Preferences on Online Newspaper Articles from User Behaviors, Proc. of the Sixth International World Wide Web Conference, In Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, Vol. 29, pp. 1447--1456 (1997).
[16]
Yoshida, M. and Yoshitaka, A.: Digital Reminder: Building and Accessing a Real-World-Oriented Database, Proc. of The 8th Workshop on Interactive Systems and Software (WISS'2000), pp. 101--110 (2000).
[17]
Ohno, T.: IMPACT: Eye Mark Reusing Technique to Support Information Browsing Task, Proc. of The 8th Workshop on Interactive Systems and Software (WISS'2000), pp. 137--146 (2000).
[18]
Okumura, M.: Introduction of Natural Language Processing Tools, IPSJ Magazine, Vol. 41, No. 11, pp. 1203--1207 (2000).
[19]
http://www.w3.org/DOM/
[20]
Goodman, D.: Dynamic HTML The Definitive Reference, O'Reilly (1998).
[21]
Miyahara, K. and Okamoto, T.: Quantified Estimation Method of User's Information Interests based on the Web Browsing and its Application to Collaborative Filtering, Proc. of the Technical Report of IEICE, ET97-115, pp. 17--24 (1998).
[22]
Shetch, B. and Maes, P.: Evolving Agents for Personalized Information Filtering, Proc. of IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications, pp. 345--352 (1993).
[23]
Mostafa, J., et al.: A Multilevel Approach to Intelligent Information Filtering: Model, System, and Evaluation, ACM Transactions of Information Systems, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 368--399 (1997).
[24]
Crabtree, I.B. and Soltysiak, S.J.: Identifying and Trackign Changing Interests, Iternational Journal of Digital Library, Vol. 4, pp. 38--53 (1998).
[25]
Osawa, Y., Sugawa, A. and Yachida, M.: An Index Navigator:Underatanding and Expressing User's Changing Interest, Journal of Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 461--469 (1998).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)SpectrumVA: Visual Analysis of Astronomical Spectra for Facilitating Classification InspectionIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.329495830:8(5386-5403)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • (2022)Wigglite: Low-cost Information Collection and TriageProceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3526113.3545661(1-16)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2022
  • (2022)Crystalline: Lowering the Cost for Developers to Collect and Organize Information for Decision MakingProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501968(1-16)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IUI '04: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
January 2004
396 pages
ISBN:1581138156
DOI:10.1145/964442
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 January 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. keyword selection
  2. mouse
  3. relevance feedback

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

IUI-CADUI04
IUI-CADUI04: Intelligent User Interface
January 13 - 16, 2004
Funchal, Madeira, Portugal

Acceptance Rates

IUI '04 Paper Acceptance Rate 72 of 140 submissions, 51%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 746 of 2,811 submissions, 27%

Upcoming Conference

IUI '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 20 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)SpectrumVA: Visual Analysis of Astronomical Spectra for Facilitating Classification InspectionIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.329495830:8(5386-5403)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • (2022)Wigglite: Low-cost Information Collection and TriageProceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3526113.3545661(1-16)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2022
  • (2022)Crystalline: Lowering the Cost for Developers to Collect and Organize Information for Decision MakingProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501968(1-16)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • (2020)Two-Stage Search on Web Pages: Effects of Information Organisation and Task ComplexityExperimental Psychology (Russia)Экспериментальная психология10.17759/exppsy.202013030213:3(15-30)Online publication date: 2020
  • (2020)İmleç İzleme Yöntemiyle Otel Web sitesi Ziyaretçilerinin Görsel İlgisinin AnaliziEskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi10.17494/ogusbd.76337121:1(41-58)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2020
  • (2018)Guidance in the human–machine analytics processVisual Informatics10.1016/j.visinf.2018.09.0032:3(166-180)Online publication date: Sep-2018
  • (2016)Using Mouse Movements to Predict Web Survey Response DifficultySocial Science Computer Review10.1177/089443931562636035:3(388-405)Online publication date: 21-Jan-2016
  • (2016)Uniqueness in User Behavior While Using the WebProceedings of the International Congress on Information and Communication Technology10.1007/978-981-10-0767-5_24(221-228)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2016
  • (2015)In Situ InsightsProceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/2766462.2767696(655-664)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2015
  • (2014)User Implicit Interest Indicators learned from the Browser on the Client SideProceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Competitive Strategies10.1145/2677855.2677912(1-4)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2014
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media