Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Collaborative Knowledge Framework for Mediation Information System Engineering

Published: 01 January 2017 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    With the worldwide interenterprise collaboration and interoperability background, automatic collaborative business process deduction is crucial and imperative researching subject. A methodology of deducing collaborative process is designed by collecting collaborative knowledge. Due to the complexity of deduction methodology, a collaborative knowledge framework is defined to organize abstract and concrete collaborative information. The collaborative knowledge framework contains three dimensions: elements, levels, and life cycle. To better define the framework, the relations in each dimension are explained in detail. They are (i) relations among elements, which organize the gathering orders and methods of different collaborative elements, (ii) relations among life cycle, which present modeling processes and agility management, and (iii) relations among levels, which define relationships among different levels of collaborative processes: strategy, operation, and support. This paper aims to explain the collaborative knowledge framework and the relations inside.

    References

    [1]
    D. Chen, G. Doumeingts, and F. Vernadat, “Architectures for enterprise integration and interoperability: past, present and future,” Computers in Industry, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 647–659, 2008.
    [2]
    C. Nicolle, J. C. Simon, and K. Yetongnon, “Interoperability of information systems,” Database, vol. 1651, p. 1650, 2005.
    [3]
    D. S. Milojicic, V. Kalogeraki, R. Lukose et al., “Peer-to-peer computing,” Citeseer, 2002.
    [4]
    N. Guarino and P. Giaretta, “Ontologies and knowledge bases—towards a terminological clarification,” in Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases, pp. 25–32, IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995.
    [5]
    G. Wiederhold, “Mediators in the architecture of future information systems,” Computer, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 38–49, 1992.
    [6]
    J. Bézivin, S. Gérard, P. A. Muller, and L. Rioux, MDA Components: Challenges and Opportunities, 2003.
    [7]
    N. Josuttis, SOA in Practice, O'reilly, 2007.
    [8]
    J. Miller and J. Mukerji, “MDA Guide Version 1.0. 1,” Object Management Group, vol. 234, p. 51, 2003.
    [9]
    W. Mu, F. Bénaben, and H. Pingaud, “A methodology proposal for collaborative business process elaboration using a model-driven approach,” Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 349–383, 2015.
    [10]
    S. Oppl, “Supporting the Collaborative Construction of a Shared Understanding About Work with a Guided Conceptual Modeling Technique,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 247–283, 2017.
    [11]
    G. Guerrero-Contreras, J. L. Navarro-Galindo, J. Samos, and J. L. Garrido, “A collaborative semantic annotation system in health: towards a SOA Design for knowledge sharing in ambient intelligence,” Mobile Information Systems, vol. 2017, 10 pages, 2017.
    [12]
    B. Knoke, M. Missikoff, and K.-D. Thoben, “Collaborative open innovation management in virtual manufacturing enterprises,” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 158–166, 2017.
    [13]
    W. Medema, J. Adamowski, C. Orr, A. Furber, A. Wals, and N. Milot, “Building a foundation for knowledge co-creation in collaborative water governance: Dimensions of stakeholder networks facilitated through bridging organizations,” Water, vol. 9, no. 1, article no. 60, 2017.
    [14]
    M. Milosevic, D. Lukic, A. Antic, B. Lalic, M. Ficko, and G. Simunovic, “e-CAPP: A distributed collaborative system for internet-based process planning,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 42, pp. 210–223, 2017.
    [15]
    E. Yeboah-Assiamah, K. Muller, and K. A. Domfeh, “Rising to the challenge: a framework for optimising value in collaborative natural resource governance,” Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 67, pp. 20–29, 2016.
    [16]
    Q. Long, “A multi-methodological collaborative simulation for inter-organizational supply chain networks,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 96, pp. 84–95, 2016.
    [17]
    S. Y. Xu and B. Raahemi, “A semantic-based service discovery framework for collaborative environments,” International Journal of Simulation Modelling, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 83–96, 2016.
    [18]
    A. Vargas, L. Cuenca, A. Boza, I. Sacala, and M. Moisescu, “Towards the development of the framework for inter sensing enterprise architecture,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 55–72, 2016.
    [19]
    R. Costa, C. Lima, J. Sarraipa, and R. Jardim-Gonçalves, “Facilitating knowledge sharing and reuse in building and construction domain: an ontology-based approach,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 263–282, 2016.
    [20]
    C. Durugbo, “Collaborative networks: A systematic review and multi-level framework,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 3749–3776, 2016.
    [21]
    K. Shahriari, A. G. Hessami, A. Jadidi, and N. Lehoux, “An approach toward a conceptual collaborative framework based on a case study in a wood supply chain,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1163–1172, 2015.
    [22]
    N. Boissel-Dallier, F. Benaben, J.-P. Lorré, and H. Pingaud, “Mediation information system engineering based on hybrid service composition mechanism,” Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 108, pp. 39–59, 2015.
    [23]
    D. A. Chappell, Enterprise Service Bus, O’Reilly Media, 2004.
    [24]
    A.-M. Barthe-Delanoë, S. Carbonnel, F. Bénaben, and H. Pingaud, “Event-driven agility of crisis management collaborative processes,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM '12), Vancouver, Canada, April 2012.
    [25]
    L. M. Camarinha-Matos and H. Afsarmanesh, “On reference models for collaborative networked organizations,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 2453–2469, 2008.
    [26]
    J. A. Zachman, “A framework for information systems architecture,” IBM Systems Journal, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 276–292, 1987.
    [27]
    DTIC, Technical Architecture Framework for Information Management. Volumes 1–8. Version 3.0 (Computer Diskette), 1996.
    [28]
    N. Umheh, A. Miller, and C. Dagli, TOGAF vs. DoDAF: Architecting Frameworks for Net-Centric Systems, 2007.
    [29]
    C4ISR, C4ISR Architecture Framework Version 2.0, AWG—US Department of Defence, 1997.
    [30]
    B. Biggs, “Ministry of Defence Architectural Framework (MODAF),” IEE Seminar on UML Systems Engineering, vol. 2005, no. 10814, pp. 43–82, 2005.
    [31]
    J. Zachman, The Zachman Framework for Enterprise Architecture, Zachman International, 2002.
    [32]
    D. Chen, B. Vallespir, and G. Doumeingts, “GRAI integrated methodology and its mapping onto generic enterprise reference architecture and methodology,” Computers in Industry, vol. 33, no. 2-3, pp. 387–394, 1997.
    [33]
    G. Doumeingts, B. Vallespir, and D. Chen, “GRAI GridDecisional modelling,” in Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems, pp. 321–346, 2006.
    [34]
    T. J. Williams and H. Li, “PERA and GERAM—enterprise reference architectures in enterprise integration,” in Information Infrastructure Systems for Manufacturing II, pp. 3–30, 1999.
    [35]
    A. W. Scheer, ARIS-Business Process Modeling, Springer, 2000.
    [36]
    K. Kosanke, “CIMOSA - Overview and status,” Computers in Industry, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 101–109, 1995.
    [37]
    J. Vamus and N. Panaich, TOGAF 9 Survey Results Presentation, 2009.
    [38]
    I. I. Force, “GERAM: Generalised Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology,” IFIP-IFAC Task Force Archit. Enterp. Integr. Tech Rep, 1999.
    [39]
    C. I. O. Council, Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework (FEAF)—Version 1.1, 1999.
    [40]
    IDEAS, A Gap Analysis—Required Activities in Research, Technology and Standardisation to Close The RTS Gap—Roadmaps And Recommendations on RTS Activites, 2003.
    [41]
    A. Berre et al., “The ATHENA interoperability framework,” in Enterprise Interoperability II, pp. 569–580, 2007.
    [43]
    ISO 9000 X50-130, “NF EN ISO 9000 X50-130 Systèmes de management de la qualité—Principes essentiels et vocabulaire,” October 2005, http://catdoc.mines-albi.fr:8080/Record.htm?idlist=6&record=19143202124919614849.
    [44]
    V. Rajsiri, J.-P. Lorré, F. Bénaben, and H. Pingaud, “Knowledge-based system for collaborative process specification,” Computers in Industry, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 161–175, 2010.
    [45]
    J. Touzi, F. Benaben, H. Pingaud, and J. P. Lorré, “A model-driven approach for collaborative service-oriented architecture design,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 5–20, 2009.
    [46]
    F. Benaben and F. B. Vernadat, “Information System agility to support collaborative organisations,” Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 470–473, 2017.
    [47]
    F. Benaben, W. Mu, N. Boissel-Dallier, A.-M. Barthe-Delanoe, S. Zribi, and H. Pingaud, “Supporting interoperability of collaborative networks through engineering of a service-based Mediation Information System (MISE 2.0),” Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 9, pp. 556–582, 2015.
    [48]
    A.-M. Barthe-Delanoë, S. Truptil, F. Bénaben, and H. Pingaud, “Event-driven agility of interoperability during the Run-time of collaborative processes,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 171–179, 2014.
    [49]
    S. Truptil, F. Benaben, H. Pingaud, and C. Hanachi, “Une architecture de système d’information collaboratif pour la gestion de crise,” in Proceedings of the INFORSID09, 2009.
    [50]
    W. Mu, F. Bénaben, and H. Pingaud, “An ontology based collaborative business service selection—contributing to automatic building of collaborative business process,” in Risks and Resilience of Collaborative Networks, vol. 463, L. M. CamarinhaMatos, F. Benaben, and W. Picard, Eds., pp. 639–651, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2015.
    [51]
    W. Mu, Caractérisation et logique d’une situation collaborative, INPT, Toulouse, France, 2012.
    [52]
    S. Lee, T.-Y. Kim, D. Kang, K. Kim, and J. Y. Lee, “Composition of executable business process models by combining business rules and process flows,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 221–229, 2007.
    [53]
    F. Bénaben, N. Boissel-Dallier, J.-P. Lorré, and H. Pingaud, “Semantic reconciliation in interoperability management through model-driven approach,” IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 336, pp. 705–712, 2010.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)A Model Driven Approach to Transform Business Vision-Oriented Decision-Making Requirement into Solution-Oriented Optimization ModelAdvances and Trends in Artificial Intelligence. Theory and Practices in Artificial Intelligence10.1007/978-3-031-08530-7_18(211-225)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2022
    • (2020)A Systematic Model to Model Transformation for Knowledge-Based Planning Generation ProblemsTrends in Artificial Intelligence Theory and Applications. Artificial Intelligence Practices10.1007/978-3-030-55789-8_13(140-152)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2020

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Scientific Programming
    Scientific Programming  Volume 2017, Issue
    2017
    637 pages
    ISSN:1058-9244
    EISSN:1875-919X
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Publisher

    Hindawi Limited

    London, United Kingdom

    Publication History

    Published: 01 January 2017

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)A Model Driven Approach to Transform Business Vision-Oriented Decision-Making Requirement into Solution-Oriented Optimization ModelAdvances and Trends in Artificial Intelligence. Theory and Practices in Artificial Intelligence10.1007/978-3-031-08530-7_18(211-225)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2022
    • (2020)A Systematic Model to Model Transformation for Knowledge-Based Planning Generation ProblemsTrends in Artificial Intelligence Theory and Applications. Artificial Intelligence Practices10.1007/978-3-030-55789-8_13(140-152)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2020

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media