Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Comparison and Analysis of Several Clustering Algorithms for Pavement Crack Segmentation Guided by Computational Intelligence

Published: 01 January 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Cracks are one of the most common types of imperfections that can be found in concrete pavement, and they have a significant influence on the structural strength. The purpose of this study is to investigate the performance differences of various spatial clustering algorithms for pavement crack segmentation and to provide some reference for the work that is being done to maintain pavement currently. This is done by comparing and analyzing the performance of complex crack photos in different settings. For the purpose of evaluating how well the comparison method works, the indices of evaluation of NMI and RI have been selected. The experiment also includes a detailed analysis and comparison of the noisy photographs. According to the results of the experiments, the segmentation effect of these cluster algorithms is significantly worse after adding Gaussian noise; based on the NMI value, the mean-shift clustering algorithm has the best de-noise effect, whereas the performance of some clustering algorithms significantly decreases after adding noise.

References

[1]
X. Feng, L. Xiao, W. Li, L. Pei, Z. Sun, and Z. Ma, “Pavement crack detection and segmentation method based on improved deep learning fusion model[J],” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 2020–2132, 2020.
[2]
W. Qiao, Q. Liu, X. Wu, B. Ma, and G. Li, “Automatic pixel-level pavement crack recognition using a deep feature aggregation segmentation network with a scSE attention mechanism module,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 2902–2911, 2021.
[3]
R. Augustauskas, “Improved pixel-level pavement-defect segmentation using a deep autoencoder[J],” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 567–587, 2020.
[4]
D. Mazzini, P. Napoletano, F. Piccoli, and R. Schettini, “A novel approach to data augmentation for pavement distress segmentation,” Computers in Industry, vol. 121, 2020.
[5]
K. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and H. D. Cheng, “CrackGAN: pavement crack detection using partially accurate ground truths based on generative adversarial learning,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1306–1319, 2021.
[6]
Z. Fan, H. Lin, C. Li, J. Su, S. Bruno, and G. Loprencipe, “Use of parallel ResNet for high-performance pavement crack detection and measurement,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 1825, 2022.
[7]
A. Ji, X. Xue, Y. Wang, X. Luo, and W. Xue, “An integrated approach to automatic pixel-level crack detection and quantification of asphalt pavement,” Automation in Construction, vol. 114, 2020.
[8]
H. Ju, W. Li, S. Tighe et al., “Three-dimensional pavement crack detection based on primary surface profile innovation optimized dual-phase computing[J],” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 89, no. Mar, pp. 103376.1–103376.11, 2020.
[9]
G. X. Hu, B. L. Hu, Z. Yang, L. Huang, and P. Li, “Pavement crack detection method based on deep learning models,” Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 2021, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2021.
[10]
L. Pei, Z. Sun, L. Xiao, W. Li, J. Sun, and H. Zhang, “Virtual generation of pavement crack images based on improved deep convolutional generative adversarial network,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 104, pp. 104376–104387, 2021.
[11]
W. Song, G. Jia, H. Zhu, D. Jia, and L. Gao, “Automated pavement crack damage detection using deep multiscale convolutional features,” Journal of Advanced Transportation, vol. 2020, pp. 1–11, 2020.
[12]
D. Kaya Ozdemir, A. Topal, B. Kacmaz, and B. Sengoz, “Evaluating the asphalt pavement's surface characteristics by field testing,” Revista de la Construcción, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 474–485, 2020.
[13]
P. C. Cong, W. Jian, Z. Lei, and S. Chen, “Underwater dam image crack segmentation based on mathematical morpholog[J],” Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 220, pp. 1315–1319, 2012.
[14]
W. Kaddah, M. Elbouz, Y. Ouerhani, V. Baltazart, M. Desthieux, and A. Alfalou, “Optimized minimal path selection (omps) method for automatic and unsupervised crack segmentation within two-dimensional pavement images,” The Visual Computer, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1293–1309, 2019.
[15]
H. B. Guo, R. Vaßen, and D. Stöver, “Atmospheric plasma sprayed thick thermal barrier coatings with high segmentation crack density,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 186, no. 3, pp. 353–363, 2004.
[16]
Y. Jiang, X. Gu, D. Wu, W. Hang, J. Xue, S. Qiu, and C.-T. Lin, “A novel negative-transfer-resistant fuzzy clustering model with a shared cross-domain transfer latent space and its application to brain CT image segmentation,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 40–52, 2021.
[17]
M. Li, J. Zhou, D. Wang, P. Peng, and Y. Yu, “Application of clustering-based analysis in MRI brain tissue segmentation,” Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, vol. 2022, p. 1, 2022.

Index Terms

  1. Comparison and Analysis of Several Clustering Algorithms for Pavement Crack Segmentation Guided by Computational Intelligence
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
          Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience  Volume 2022, Issue
          2022
          32389 pages
          ISSN:1687-5265
          EISSN:1687-5273
          Issue’s Table of Contents
          This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

          Publisher

          Hindawi Limited

          London, United Kingdom

          Publication History

          Published: 01 January 2022

          Qualifiers

          • Research-article

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • 0
            Total Citations
          • 0
            Total Downloads
          • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
          Reflects downloads up to 27 Jan 2025

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          View Options

          View options

          Figures

          Tables

          Media

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media