article

Judging Perceived and Traversed Distance in Virtual Environments

Authors:

Paul B. KlineAuthors Info & Claims

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, Volume 7, Issue 2

Pages 144 - 167

https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565640

Published: 01 April 1998 Publication History

Abstract

The ability to accurately estimate distance is an essential component of navigating large-scale spaces. Although the factors that influence distance estimation have been a topic of research in real-world environments for decades and are well known, research on distance estimation in virtual environments (VEs) has only just begun. Initial investigations of distance estimation in VEs suggest that observers are less accurate in estimating distance in VEs than in the real world (Lampton et al., 1995). Factors influencing distance estimates may be divided into those affecting perceived distance (visual cues only) and those affecting traversed distance to include visual, cognitive, and proprioceptive cues. To assess the contribution of the various distance cues in VEs, two experiments were conducted. The first required a static observer to estimate the distance to a cylinder placed at various points along a 130-foot hallway. This experiment examined the effects of floor texture, floor pattern, and object size on distance estimates in a VE. The second experiment required a moving observer to estimate route segment distances and total route distances along four routes, each totaling 1210 feet. This experiment assessed the effects of movement method, movement speed, compensatory cues, and wall texture density. Results indicate that observers underestimate distances both in VEs and in the real world, but the underestimates are more extreme in VEs. Texture did not reliably affect the distance estimates, providing no compensation for the gross underestimates of distance in VE. Traversing a distance improves the ability to estimate that distance, but more natural means of moving via a treadmill do not necessarily improve distance estimates over traditional methods of moving in VE (e.g., using a joystick). The addition of compensatory cues (tone every 10 feet traversed on alternate route segments) improves VE distance estimation to almost perfect performance.

References

[1]

Chase, W. G. (1983). Spatial representation in taxi drivers. In D. R. Rogers and J. A. Sloboda (Eds.), Acquisition of symbolic skills. New York: Plenum.

[2]

Cutting, J. E. and Vishton, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein and S. J. Rogers, (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Volume 5, Perception of space and motion (pp. 69-117). New York: Academic Press.

[3]

DeMaio, J., Rinalducci, E. J., Brooks, R., & Brunderman, J. (1983). Visual cueing effectiveness: Comparison of perception and flying performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 27th Annual Meeting, 928-932.

[4]

Denton, G. G. (1980). The influence of visual pattern on perceived speed. Perception, 9, 393-402.

[5]

Eggleston, R. G., Janson, W. P., & Aldrich, K. A. (1996). Virtual reality system affects on size-distance judgements. Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (VRAIS '96), 139-146.

[6]

Elliot, D. (1987). The influence of walking speed and prior practice on locomotor distance estimation, Journal of Motor Behavior, 19(4), 476-485.

[7]

Galantner, E., & Galantner, P. (1970). Range estimates of distant visual stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics, 14(2), 301- 306.

[8]

Gibson, E. J., & Bergman, R. (1954). The effect of training on absolute estimation of distance over the ground. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 473-482.

[9]

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception . Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

[10]

Gilliam (1995). The perception of spatial layout from static optical information. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of Space and Motion. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.

[11]

Gillner, S., & Mallot (in press). Navigation and acquisition of spatial knowledge of a virtual maze. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. An earlier version of the paper is available at http://www.mpik-tueb.mpg.de as Technical Report No. 45.

[12]

Goldin, S. E. and Thorndyke, P. W. (1981) Simulating navigation for spatial knowledge acquisition. Human Factors, 24(4) 457-471.

[13]

Golledge, R. G. (1991). Cognition of physical and built environments. In Garling, T. R. & Evans, W. (Eds.), Environment, cognition, and action: An integrated approach (pp. 35-62). New York: Oxford University Press.

[14]

Haber, R. N. (1985). Toward a theory of perceived spatial layout of scenes. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 31, 282-321.

[15]

Hale, J. P., & Dittmar, M. L. (1994). Virtual reality as a human factors design tool for architectural spaces--Control rooms to space stations I: Objective measures. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, 275-279.

[16]

Holway, A. H., & Boring, E. G. (1941). Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variant. American Journal of Psychology, 54, 21-37.

[17]

James, K. R., & Caird, J. K. (1995). The effects of optic flow, proprioception, and texture on novice locomotion in virtual environments. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting, 1405-1409.

[18]

Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Beall, A. C., Chance, S. S., & Golledge, R. G. (1997). Updating an egocentric spatial representation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Manuscript submitted for publication.

[19]

Kleiss, J. A., & Hubbard, D. C. (1993). Effects of three types of simulator visual scene detail on detection of altitude change. Human Factors, 35(4), 653-672.

[20]

Kolasinski, E. M. (1995). Simulator sickness in virtual environments (ARI Technical Report 1027). Alexandria, VA: US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

[21]

Lampton, D. R., Singer, M. J., McDonald, D., & Bliss, J. P. (1995). Distance estimation in virtual environments. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting, 1268-1272.

[22]

Lee, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5(4), 437-459.

[23]

Loomis, J. M., Da Silva, J. A., Fujita, N., & Fukusima, S. S. (1992). Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 906-921.

[24]

Montello, D. R. (1991). The measurement of cognitive distance: Methods and construct validity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 101-122.

[25]

Okabe, A., Aoki, K., & Hamamoto, W. (1986). Distance and direction judgment in a large-scale natural environment: Effects of a slope and winding trail. Environment and Behavior, 18(6) 755-772.

[26]

Patterson, R., & Martin, W. L. (1992). Human stereopsis. Human Factors, 34, 669-692.

[27]

Pausch, R., Crea, T., & Conway, M. (1993). A literature survey for virtual environments: Military flight simulator visual systems and simulator sickness. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(3), 344-363.

[28]

Psotka, J., Davison, S. A., & Lewis, S. A. (1993). Exploring immersion in virtual space. Virtual Reality Systems, 1(2), 70-82.

[29]

Regan, C. (1995). An investigation into nausea and other side-effects of head-coupled immersive virtual reality. Virtual Reality: Research, Development and Applications, 1(1), 17-32.

Digital Library

[30]

Rieser, J. J., Ashmead, D. H., Talor, C. R., & Youngquist, G. A. (1990). Visual perception and guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets. Perception 19, 675-689.

[31]

Rieser, J. J., Pick, H. L., Ashmead, D. H., & Garing, A. E. (1995). Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(3), 480- 497.

[32]

Rinalducci, E. J., De Maio, J., Patterson, M. J., & Brooks, R. (1983). Psychophysical assessment of simulator visual displays. Proceedings of the Ohio State Aviation Psychology Symposium .

[33]

Rinalducci, E. J. (1994). Characteristics of visual fidelity in the virtual environment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5(3), 330-345.

Digital Library

[34]

Robinett, W., & Rolland, J. P. (1992). A computational model for stereoscopic optics of a head-mounted display. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), 45-62.

Digital Library

[35]

Rushton, S., & Wann, J. (1993). Problems in perception and action in virtual worlds. In Virtual Reality: Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference on Virtual Reality (pp. 43-55). Westport, CT: Meckler Ltd.

[36]

Sadalla, E. K., & Magel, S. G. (1980). The perception of traversed distance. Environment and Behavior, 12(1), 65-79.

[37]

Sadalla, E. K., & Staplin, L. J. (1980a). The perception of traversed distance: Intersections. Environment and Behavior, 12(2), 167-182.

[38]

Sadalla, E. K., & Staplin, L. J. (1980b). An information storage model for distance cognition. Environment and Behavior, 12(2), 183-193.

[39]

Siegel, A. W. (1981). The externalization of cognitive maps by children and adults: In search of ways to ask better questions. In L. S. Liben, A. H. Patterson, & N. Newcombe (Eds.), Spatial representation and behavior across the life span: Theory and application (pp. 167-194). New York: Academic Press.

[40]

Steenhuis, R. E., & Goodale, M. A. (1988). The effects of time and distance on accuracy of target-directed locomotion: Does accuracy of short-term memory for spatial location exist? Journal of Motor Behavior, 20(4), 399-415.

[41]

Stevens, S. S. (1986). Psychophysics. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books. Original edition (1975) Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. John Wiley, New York.

[42]

Surdick, T. R., Davis, E. T., King, R. A., Corso, G. M., Shapiro, A., Hodges, L., & Elliot, K. (1994). Relevant cues for the visual perception of depth: Is where you see it where it is? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, 1305-1309.

[43]

Thomson, J. A. (1983). Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9(3), 427- 443.

[44]

Thorndyke, P. W., & Hayes-Roth, B. (1980). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation (Report N-1595-ONR). Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.

[45]

Warren, R. (1990). Preliminary questions for the study of ego-motion. In R. Warren and A. H. Werthhiem (Eds.), Perception and control of self motion (pp. 3-32). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[46]

Wickens, C. D. (1990). Three-dimensional stereoscopic display implementation: Guidelines derived from human visual capabilities . SPIE proceedings Vol. 1256, Santa Clara, CA.

[47]

Wickens, C. D., Todd, S., & Seidler, K. (1989). Three-dimensional displays: Perception, implementation, and applications (CSERIAC SOAR 89-001 Technical report, AFAAMRL). Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.

[48]

Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. (1994). Measuring presence in virtual environments (ARI Technical Report 1014). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. (AD A286 183).

[49]

Wolpert, L. (1990). Field-of-view information for self-motion perception. In R. Warren and A. H. Werthhiem (Eds.), Perception and control of self motion (pp. 101-126). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[50]

Wright, R. H. (1995). Virtual reality psychophysics: Forward and lateral distance, height and speed perceptions with a wide-angle helmet display (ARI Technical Report 1025). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

Cited By

Oyedokun OMubarrat SJoshi AMousas CKao D(2024)Exploring the Influence of Avatar Skin Tone in VR Educational GamesCompanion Proceedings of the 2024 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play10.1145/3665463.3678799(227-234)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3665463.3678799
Wang XSouthwick DRobinson INitsche MResch GMazalek AWelsh T(2024)The geometry of the vergence-accommodation conflict in mixed reality systemsVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-024-00991-428:2Online publication date: 11-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10055-024-00991-4
Kelly J(2023)Distance Perception in Virtual Reality: A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Head-Mounted Display CharacteristicsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2022.319660629:12(4978-4989)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3196606
Show More Cited By

Judging Perceived and Traversed Distance in Virtual Environments
1. Human-centered computing

Recommendations

Distance perception in real and virtual environments

We conducted three experiments to compare distance perception in real and virtual environments. In Experiment 1, adults estimated how long it would take to walk to targets in real and virtual environments by starting and stopping a stopwatch while ...
Distance perception in virtual environments: a closer look at the horizon and the error
APGV '09: Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization

Distances are systematically underestimated in the virtual environments. In this work we explore the possibility of shifting the angular the angular declination from the horizon as a way of manipulating perceived distances in a head-mounted display (HMD)...
Distance perception in real and virtual environments
APGV '04: Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization

Two experiments were conducted to compare distance perception in real and virtual environments. In Experiment 1, adults estimated how long it would take to walk to targets in real and virtual environments by starting and stopping a stopwatch while ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments Volume 7, Issue 2

April 1998

124 pages

ISSN:1054-7460

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

MIT Press

Cambridge, MA, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 April 1998

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

75
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Oyedokun OMubarrat SJoshi AMousas CKao D(2024)Exploring the Influence of Avatar Skin Tone in VR Educational GamesCompanion Proceedings of the 2024 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play10.1145/3665463.3678799(227-234)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3665463.3678799
Wang XSouthwick DRobinson INitsche MResch GMazalek AWelsh T(2024)The geometry of the vergence-accommodation conflict in mixed reality systemsVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-024-00991-428:2Online publication date: 11-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10055-024-00991-4
Kelly J(2023)Distance Perception in Virtual Reality: A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Head-Mounted Display CharacteristicsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2022.319660629:12(4978-4989)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3196606
Buttussi FChittaro L(2023)Acquisition and retention of spatial knowledge through virtual reality experiencesInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103067177:COnline publication date: 26-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103067
Huang YVenkatakrishnan RVenkatakrishnan RBabu SLin W(2021)Using Audio Reverberation to Compensate Distance Compression in Virtual RealityACM Symposium on Applied Perception 202110.1145/3474451.3476236(1-10)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3474451.3476236
Borsum FPascher MAuda JSchneegass SLux GGerken J(2021)Stay on Course in VR: Comparing the Precision of Movement between Gamepad, Armswinger, and TreadmillProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202110.1145/3473856.3473880(354-365)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3473856.3473880
Souza VMaciel ANedel LKopper R(2021)Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A SurveyACM Computing Surveys10.1145/346681754:8(1-37)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3466817
Triantafyllidis ELi Z(2021)The Challenges in Modeling Human Performance in 3D Space with Fitts’ LawExtended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411763.3443442(1-9)Online publication date: 8-May-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3411763.3443442
Luo YWang JLiang HLuo SLim E(2021)Monoscopic vs. Stereoscopic Views and Display Types in the Teleoperation of Unmanned Ground Vehicles for Object Avoidance2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515455(418-425)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515455
Hornsey RHibbard P(2021)Contributions of pictorial and binocular cues to the perception of distance in virtual realityVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-021-00500-x25:4(1087-1103)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10055-021-00500-x
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents