article

Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction

Author:

Daniel McFarlaneAuthors Info & Claims

Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 17, Issue 1

Pages 63 - 139

https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1701_2

Published: 01 March 2002 Publication History

Abstract

Interruptions can cause people to make mistakes or errors during human-computer interaction (HCI). Interruptions occur as an unavoidable side-effect of some important kinds of human computer-based activities, for example, (a) constantly monitor for unscheduled changes in information environments, (b) supervise background autonomous services, and (c) intermittently collaborate and communicate with other people. Fortunately, people have powerful innate cognitive abilities that they can potentially leverage to manage multiple concurrent activities if they have specific kinds of control and interaction support. There is great opportunity, therefore, for user-interface design to increase people's ability to successfully handle interruptions, and prevent expensive errors. The literature contains very little concrete design wisdom about how to solve the interruption problems in user interfaces (UIs). Coordination support, however, is identified as a most important design topic. This article presents the results of an empirical investigation to compare basic design solutions for coordinating human interruption in computer-based multitasks. A theory-based taxonomy of human interruption is used to identify the four primary methods for coordinating human interruption. An experiment with 36 participants compares these four different design solutions within an abstracted common user multitasking context. The results show important design tradeoffs for coordinating the interruption of people in HCI and support some UI design guidelines. Negotiation support is the best overall solution except where small differences in the timeliness of handling interruptions is critical and then immediate is best.

References

[1]

Aronson, E. (1995). The social animal. New York: W. H. Freeman.

[2]

Ballas, J. A., Heitmeyer, C. L., & Péérez, M. A. (1992a). Direct manipulation and intermittent automation in advanced cockpits (NRL Formal Report NRL/FR/5534-92-9375). Washington, DC: The Naval Research Laboratory.

[3]

Ballas, J. A., Heitmeyer, C. L., & Péérez, M. A. (1992b). Evaluating two aspects of direct manipulation in advanced cockpits. Paper presented at CHI '92 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems, ACM, New York.

Digital Library

[4]

Berger, T., Kamoun, A., & Millot, P. (1988). Real time measurement of workload in discrete multitask situations and extensions to continuous tasks. International Conference on Human Machine Interaction and Artificial Intelligence in Aeronautics and Space, Toulouse-Blagnac, France.

[5]

Braune, R., & Wickens, C. D. (1986). Time sharing revisited: Test of a componential model for the assessment of individual differences. Ergonomics, 29, 1399-1414.

[6]

Burton, R. R., & Brown, J. S. (1979). An investigation of computer coaching for informal learning activities. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 11, 5-24.

[7]

Cabon, P., Coblentz, A., & Mollard, R. (1990). Interruption of a monotonous activity with complex tasks: Effects of individual differences. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL, 912-916.

[8]

Cellier, J. M., & Eyrolle, H. (1992). Interference between switched tasks. Ergonomics, 35(1), 25-36.

[9]

Chapanis, A. (1978). Interactive communication: A few research answers for a technological explosion . Text of an invited address given at the 86th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED168084/CS502432)

[10]

Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one or two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975-979.

[11]

Chignell, M. H., & Hancock, P. A. (1988). Intelligent interface design. In M. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 969-995). New York: Elsevier.

[12]

Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. New York: Cambridge University Press.

[13]

Cohen, S. (1980). Aftereffects of stress on human performance and social behavior: A review of research and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 88(1), 82-108.

[14]

Cook, C., Corbridge, C., Morgan, C., & Turpin, E. (1999). Investigating methods of dynamic function allocation for naval command and control. Proceedings of People in Control, Bath, UK, IEEE Conference Publication No. 463, 388-393.

[15]

Cooper, R., & Franks, B. (1993). Interruptibility as a constraint on hybrid systems. Minds & Machines, 3(1), 73-96.

[16]

Cypher, A. (1986). The structure of user's activities. In D. A. Norman & S.W. Draper (Eds.), User centered system design (pp. 243-263). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

[17]

Czerwinski, M. P., Chrisman, S. E., & Rudisill, M. (1991). Interruptions in multitasking situations: The effects of similarity and warning (Tech. Rep. JSC-24757). Houston, Texas: National Aviation and Space Administration, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center.

[18]

Czerwinski, M., Chrisman, S. E., & Schumacher, B. (1991). The effects of warnings and display similarities on interruption in multitasking environments. SIGCHI Bulletin, 23(4), 38-39.

Digital Library

[19]

Czerwinski, M., Cutrell, E., & Horvitz, E. (2000a, December). Instant messaging and interruption: Influence of task type on performance. Proceedings of OZCHI 2000, Sydney, Australia.

[20]

Czerwinski, M., Cutrell, E., & Horvitz, E. (2000b). Instant messaging: Effects of relevance and time. In S. Turner & P. Turner (Eds.), People and computers XIV: Proceedings of HCI 2000, Vol. 2, British Computer Society, 71-76.

[21]

Davies, S. P., Findlay, J. M., & Lambert, A. J. (1989). The perception and tracking of state changes in complex systems. In G. Salvendy & M. J. Smith (Eds.), Designing and using human-computer interfaces and knowledge based systems (pp. 510-517). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

[22]

Field, G. E. (1987). Experimentus interruptus. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 19(2), 42-46.

Digital Library

[23]

Galdes, D. K., & Smith, P. J. (1990). Building an intelligent tutoring system: Some guidelines from a study of human tutors. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting, 1407-1411.

[24]

Gaver, W. W. (1989). The sonicfinder: An interface that uses auditory icons. Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 67-94.

Digital Library

[25]

Gillie, T., & Broadbent, D. E. (1989). What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity. Psychological Research, 50(4), 243-250.

[26]

Hall, B. L., & Hursch, D. E. (1982). An evaluation of the effects of a time management training program on work efficiency. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 3(4), 73-96.

[27]

Hammer, J. M., & Small, R. L. (1995). An intelligent interface in an associate system. In W. B. Rouse (Ed.), Human/technology interaction in complex systems (Vol. 7, pp. 1-44). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

[28]

Hess, S. M., & Detweiler, M. C. (1994). Training to reduce the disruptive effects of interruptions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, 1173-1177.

[29]

Husain, M. G. (1987). Immediate and delayed recall of completed-interrupted tasks by high and low anxious subjects. Manas, 34(1-2), 67-71.

[30]

Ishihara, S. (1996). Ishihara's tests for colour-deficiency, concise edition. Tokyo, Japan: Kanehara & Co.

[31]

Jensen, A. R., & Rohwer, W. D., Jr. (1966). The Stroop color-word test: A review. Acta Psychologica, 25, 36-93.

[32]

Jessup, L. M., & Connolly, T. (1993). The effects of interaction frequency on the productivity and satisfaction of automated problem-solving groups. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 142-151.

[33]

Joslyn, S., & Hunt, E. (1998). Evaluating individual differences in response to time-pressure situations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4(1), 16-43.

[34]

Karis, D. (1991). Evaluating transmission quality in mobile telecommunication systems using conversation tests. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting.

[35]

Katz, R. (1995). Automatic versus user-controlled methods of briefly interrupting telephone calls. Human Factors, 37, 321-334.

[36]

Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

[37]

Kirlik, A. (1993). Modeling strategic behavior in human-automation interaction-Why an aid can (and should) go unused. Human Factors, 35, 221-242.

[38]

Kirschenbaum, S. S., Gray, W. D., Ehret, B. D., & Miller, S. L. (1996). When using the tool interferes with doing the task. Short paper published in the conference companion of the ACM CHI '96 Conference Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancover, British Columbia, Canada.

Digital Library

[39]

Kreifeldt, J. G., & McCarthy, M. E. (1981). Interruption as a test of the user-computer interface. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Manual Control, JPL Publication, 81-95.

[40]

Latorella, K. A. (1996a). Investigating interruptions: An example from the flight deck. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA, 87-91.

[41]

Latorella, K. A. (1996b). Investigating Interruptions: Implications for flight deck performance. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo (also published in 1999 as NASA Technical Memorandum 209707, National Aviation & Space Administration, Washington, DC).

[42]

Latorella, K. A. (1998). Effects of modality on interrupted flight deck performance: Implications for data link. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42th Annual Meeting.

[43]

Lee, W. O. (1992). The effects of skill development and feedback on action slips. Proceedings of the HCI '92 Conference on People and Computers VII.

Digital Library

[44]

Lieberman, H. (1997). Autonomous interface agents. Paper presented at CHI '97 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems, ACM, New York.

Digital Library

[45]

Lustig, M.W. (1980). Computer analysis of talk-silence patterns in triads. Communication Quarterly, 28(4), 2-12.

[46]

McCarthy, J. C., & Monk, A. F. (1994). Channels, conversation, cooperation and relevance: All you wanted to know about communication but were afraid to ask. Collaborative Computing, 1, 35-60.

[47]

McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. J. (1996). Disorientation in hypertext: The effects of three text structures on navigation performance. Applied Ergonomics, 27(1), 61-68.

[48]

McFarlane, D. C. (1997). Interruption of people in human-computer interaction: A general unifying definition of human interruption and taxonomy (NRL Formal Report NRL/FR/5510-97-9870). Washington, DC: Naval Research Laboratory.

[49]

McFarlane, D. C. (1998). Interruption of people in human-computer interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Washington University, Washington, DC.

Digital Library

[50]

McFarlane, D. C. (1999). Coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. In M. A. Sasse & C. Johnson (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction-INTERACT '99 (IFIP TC.13, pp. 295-303). Edinburgh, England: IOS.

[51]

McFarlane, D. C., & Latorella, K. A. (2002). The scope and importance of human interruption in HCI design. Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 1-61.

Digital Library

[52]

Miyata, Y., & Norman, D. A. (1986). Psychological issues in support of multiple activities. In D. A. Norman & S. W. Draper (Eds.), User centered system design (pp. 265-284). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

[53]

Moray, N., Dessouky, M. I., & Kijowski, B. A. (1991). Strategic behavior, workload, and performance in task scheduling. Human Factors, 33, 607-629.

[54]

Morrin, K. A., Law, D. J., & Pellegrino, J. W. (1994). Structural modeling of information coordination abilities: An evaluation and extension of the Yee, Hunt, and Pellegrino Model. Intelligence, 19, 117-144.

[55]

National Transportation Safety Board. (1988). Aircraft accident report, Northwest Airlines Inc., McDonnell-Douglas DC-9-82, N312RC, Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport, Romulus, Michigan (NTSB-AAR-88-05). Washington, DC: National Transportation Safety Board.

[56]

Nintendo. (1980-1981). Game & watch: Fire. Nintendo of America Inc., P.O. Box 97032, Redmond, WA 98073-9732.

[57]

Nintendo. (1997). Game & watch gallery, for Game Boy. Nintendo of America Inc., P.O. Box 97032, Redmond, WA 98073-9732.

[58]

Oberg, B., & Notkin, D. (1992). Error reporting with graduated color. IEEE Software, 9(6), 33-38.

Digital Library

[59]

Obermayer, R.W., & Nugent, W. A. (2000). Human-computer interaction for alert warning and attention allocation systems of the multi-modal watchstation. SPIE 2000, SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham, WA.

[60]

Osga, G. A. (2000). 21st century workstations-Active partners in accomplishing task goals. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 44th Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.

[61]

Raby, M. & Wickens, C. D. (1991). Strategic behaviour in flight workload management. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Colum--bus, OH, 1130-1135.

[62]

Rich, C. (1996). Window Sharing with Collaborative Interface Agents. SIGCHI Bulletin, 28(1), 70-78.

Digital Library

[63]

Rouncefield, M., Hughes, J. A., Rodden, T., & Viller, S. (1994). Working with "constant interruption:" CSCW and the small office. Proceedings of the CSCW '94 conference on computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 275-286). New York: ACM.

Digital Library

[64]

Sheridan, T. B. (1987). Supervisory control. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors (pp. 1243-1268): New York: Wiley.

[65]

Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J., Jr. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

[66]

Smith, S. L., & Mosier, J. N. (1986). Guidelines for designing user interface software (Report ESD-TR-86-278). Bedford, MA: MITRE.

[67]

Speier, C., Valacich, J. S., & Vessey, I. (1997). The effects of task interruption and information presentation on individual decision making. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 21-36). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

Digital Library

[68]

Storch, N. A. (1992). Does the user interface make interruptions disruptive? A study of interface style and form of interruption (UCRL-JC-108993; report number DE92011295). Springfield, VA: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, distributed by the National Technological Information Service.

[69]

Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.

[70]

Tulga, M. K., & Sheridan, T. B. (1980). Dynamic decisions and work load in multitask supervisory control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, & Cybernetics, SMC-10(5), 217-232.

[71]

Van Bergen, A. (1968). Task interruption. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

[72]

Wagenaar, W. A. (1969). Note on the construction of digram-balanced latin squares. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 384-386.

[73]

Weiner, B. (1965). Need achievement and the resumption of incompleted tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(2), 165-168.

[74]

West, C. (1982). Why can't a woman be more like a man? An interactional note on organizational game-playing for managerial women. Work and Occupations, 9(1), 5-29.

[75]

Williams, C. L. (1995). Potential conflicts of time sharing the flight management system control display unit with data link communications. Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 341-347.

[76]

Woods, D. D. (1995). The alarm problem and directed attention in dynamic fault management. Ergonomics, 38(11), 2371-2393.

[77]

Zijlstra, F. R. H., & Roe, R. A. (1999). Temporal factors in mental work: Effects of interrupted activities. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 163-185.

[78]

Zimmerman, D. H., & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversations. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 105-129). Rowley, MA: Newbury.

Cited By

Piorkowski DOstrand RBrimijoin KHe JAlbert EHoude S(2024)Towards Interactive Guidance for Writing Training Utterances for Conversational AgentsProceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces10.1145/3640794.3665553(1-15)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3640794.3665553
Bahnsen KTiemann LPlabst LGrundgeiger T(2024)Augmented Reality Cues Facilitate Task Resumption after Interruptions in Computer-Based and Physical TasksProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642666(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642666
Gerber MSchroeter RJohnson DJanssen CRakotonirainy AKuo JLenné M(2024)An Eye Gaze Heatmap Analysis of Uncertainty Head-Up Display Designs for Conditional Automated DrivingProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642219(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642219
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction

Recommendations

Methods for human - computer interaction research with older people
Designing Computer Systems for and with Older Users

Experimental research in human - computer interaction commonly uses participant groups that are unrepresentative of demographic realities, being young, technically knowledgeable and highly educated. One way of reflecting society more accurately in ...
Interruption of people in human-computer interaction
Self-interruption on the computer: a typology of discretionary task interleaving
CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

The typical information worker is interrupted every 12 minutes, and half of the time they are interrupting themselves. However, most of the research on interruption in the area of human-computer interaction has focused on understanding and managing ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Human-Computer Interaction

Human-Computer Interaction Volume 17, Issue 1

March 2002

138 pages

ISSN:0737-0024

EISSN:1532-7051

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 March 2002

Revised: 07 August 2000

Received: 06 July 1999

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

108
Total Citations
View Citations
707
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 14 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Piorkowski DOstrand RBrimijoin KHe JAlbert EHoude S(2024)Towards Interactive Guidance for Writing Training Utterances for Conversational AgentsProceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces10.1145/3640794.3665553(1-15)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3640794.3665553
Bahnsen KTiemann LPlabst LGrundgeiger T(2024)Augmented Reality Cues Facilitate Task Resumption after Interruptions in Computer-Based and Physical TasksProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642666(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642666
Gerber MSchroeter RJohnson DJanssen CRakotonirainy AKuo JLenné M(2024)An Eye Gaze Heatmap Analysis of Uncertainty Head-Up Display Designs for Conditional Automated DrivingProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642219(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642219
Plabst LRaikwar AOberdörfer SOrtega FNiebling F(2023)Exploring Unimodal Notification Interaction and Display Methods in Augmented RealityProceedings of the 29th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology10.1145/3611659.3615683(1-11)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3611659.3615683
Lin YLin LWang CChang Y(2023)AdJustMoment: Customize Your Ad Watching ExperienceAdjunct Proceedings of the 2023 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing & the 2023 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computing10.1145/3594739.3610700(103-107)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3594739.3610700
Zhou CFennedy KTan FZhao SShao Y(2023)Not All Spacings are Created Equal: The Effect of Text Spacings in On-the-go Reading Using Optical See-Through Head-Mounted DisplaysProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581430(1-19)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581430
Chang XHsu FLiang EChiou ZChuang HTseng FLin YChang Y(2023)Not Merely Deemed as Distraction: Investigating Smartphone Users’ Motivations for Notification-InteractionProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581146(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581146
Stangl FRiedl R(2023)Interruptions in the Workplace: An Exploratory Study Among Digital Business ProfessionalsHCI in Business, Government and Organizations10.1007/978-3-031-36049-7_29(400-422)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-36049-7_29
Wu TMartelaro NStent SOrtiz JJu W(2021)Learning When Agents Can Talk to Drivers Using the INAGT Dataset and Multisensor FusionProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/34781255:3(1-28)Online publication date: 14-Sep-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3478125
Nguyen NZuniga AFlores HLee HPerrault SNurmi P(2021)Intelligent Shifting Cues: Increasing the Awareness of Multi-Device Interaction OpportunitiesProceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3450613.3456839(213-223)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3450613.3456839
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents