Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Research Note-Migration of Service to the Internet: Evidence from a Federal Natural Experiment

Published: 01 September 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Previous research into consumer choice of service channels studied the impact of online access as an addition to conventional service. Here, we study the impact of a compulsory migration to an online channel. We exploit a natural experiment in the implementation of a new federal government service to identify the causal effect of access channel on consumer choice. The government served western states through the Internet and telephone at all times. However, for the first 10 days, the government served the East through the Internet only. Comparing consumer responses in the East only Internet service available and West both Internet and telephone service available, we find robust evidence that some consumers preferred telephone access. The unavailability of telephone service in the first 10 days resulted in a 4.3% loss of consumers who were otherwise interested in the service.

References

[1]
Agarwal R, Animesh A, Prasad K (2009) Social interactions and the "digital divide": Explaining variations in Internet use. Inform. Systems Res. 20(2):277-294.
[2]
Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
[3]
Arora A, Forman C, Yoon JW (2010) Complementarity and information technology adoption: Local area networks and the Internet. Inform. Econom. Policy 22(3):228-242.
[4]
Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249-275.
[5]
Boyd R, Seldon BJ (1990) The fleeting effect of advertising: Empirical evidence from a case study. Marketing Lett. 34(4):375-379.
[6]
Dewan S, Riggins FJ (2005) The digital divide: Current and future research directions. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 6(12):298-337.
[7]
Dewan S, Ganley D, Kraemer KL (2010) Complementarities in the diffusion of personal computers and the Internet: Implications for the global digital divide. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):925-940.
[8]
Fairlie RW (2006) The personal computer and entrepreneurship. Management Sci. 52(2):187-203.
[9]
Federal Trade Commission (2003a) Amendment of solicitation/modification of contract, June 3. Accessed August 29, 2011, http://www.ftc.gov/foia/dnccontract.pdf.
[10]
Federal Trade Commission (2003b) News flash: "National Do Not Call Registry," Vol. 2, No. 6. Accessed August 29, 2011, http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/newsletters/fortheconsumer/2003/ftcv02n06.shtm.
[11]
Federal Trade Commission (2003c) Do Not Call registrations top 12.5 million. Press release, July 1. Accessed June 14, 2015, https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2003/07/do-not-call-registrations-top-125-million.
[12]
Federal Trade Commission (2003d) National Do Not Call Registry¿Total registrations as of September 16, 2003. Accessed January 25, 2010, http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2003/09/030917dncstates.pdf.
[13]
Forman C (2005) The corporate digital divide: Determinants of Internet adoption. Management Sci. 51(4):641-654.
[14]
Forman C, Ghose A, Goldfarb A (2009) Competition between local and electronic markets: How the benefit of buying online depends on where you live. Management Sci. 55(1):47-57.
[15]
Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2005) How did location affect adoption of the commercial Internet? Global village vs. urban leadership. J. Urban Econom. 58(3):389-420.
[16]
Goh KY, Hui KL, Png IPL (2011) Newspaper report and consumer choice: Evidence from the Do Not Call Registry. Management Sci. 57(9):1640-1654.
[17]
Goldberger AS (1968) The interpretation and estimation of Cobb-Douglas functions. Econometrica 36(3/4):464-472.
[18]
Goldfarb A, Prince J (2008) Internet adoption and usage patterns are different: Implications for the digital divide. Inform. Econom. Policy 20(1):2-15.
[19]
Goolsbee A, Klenow PJ (2002) Evidence on learning and network externalities in the diffusion of home computers. J. Law Econom. 45(2):317-343.
[20]
Hsieh JJP-A, Rai A, Keil M (2011) Addressing digital inequality for the socioeconomically disadvantaged through government initiatives: Forms of capital that affect ICT utilization. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):233-253.
[21]
Jensen R (2007) The digital provide: Information (technology), market performance, and welfare in the south Indian fisheries sector. Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):879-924.
[22]
Kumar A, Telang R (2012) Does Web reduce customer service cost? Empirical evidence from a call center. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):721-737.
[23]
Lee DS, Lemieux T (2010) Regression discontinuity designs in economics. J. Econom. Literature 48(2):281-355.
[24]
Los Angeles Times (2003) Millions rush to register on FTC "Do-Not-Call" list (July 1). http://articles.latimes.com/2003/jul/01/business/fi-call1.
[25]
Triplett JE (1989) Price and technological change in a capital good: A survey of research on computers. Jorgenson D, Landau R, eds. Technology and Capital Formation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 127-213.
[26]
U.S. Census Bureau (2003) Current population survey. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. http://www.census.gov/cps/.
[27]
U.S. Census Bureau (2012) Statistical abstract of the United States. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC. http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/.
[28]
Varian H, Wallenberg F, Woroch G (2004) Who signed up for the Do-Not-Call list? Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
[29]
Venkatesh V, Sykes TA (2013) Digital divide initiative success in developing countries: A longitudinal field study in a village in India. Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):239-260.
[30]
Wei KK, Teo HH, Chan HC, Tan BCY (2011) Conceptualizing and testing a social cognitive model of the digital divide. Inform. Systems Res. 22(1):170-187.
[31]
Wooldridge JM (2006) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 3rd ed. (Thomson Southwestern, Mason, OH).
[32]
Xue M, Harker PT (2002) Customer efficiency: Concept and its impact on e-business management. J. Service Res. 4(4):253-267.
[33]
Xue M, Hitt LM, Harker PT (2007) Customer efficiency, channel usage and firm performance in retail banking. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(4):535-558.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Research Note-Migration of Service to the Internet: Evidence from a Federal Natural Experiment
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Information Systems Research
    Information Systems Research  Volume 26, Issue 3
    September 2015
    167 pages

    Publisher

    INFORMS

    Linthicum, MD, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 September 2015
    Received: 15 August 2012

    Author Tags

    1. Do Not Call Registry
    2. channel choice
    3. natural experiment
    4. service migration

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media