Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

When Discounts Hurt Sales: The Case of Daily-Deal Markets

Published: 01 September 2018 Publication History

Abstract

We investigate whether the discounts offered by online daily deals help attract consumer purchases. By tracking the sales of 19,978 deals on Groupon.com and conducting a battery of identification and falsification tests, we find that deep discounts reduce sales. A 1% increase in a deal's discount decreases sales by 0.035%-0.256%. If a merchant offers an additional 10% discount from the sample mean of 55.6%, sales could decrease by 0.63%-4.60%, or 0.80-5.24 units and $42-$275 in revenue. This negative effect of discount is more prominent among credence goods and deals with low sales, and when the deals are offered in cities with higher income and better education. Our findings suggest that consumers are concerned about product quality, and excessive discounts may reduce sales immediately. A follow-up lab experiment provides further support to this quality-concern explanation. Furthermore, it suggests the existence of a "threshold" effect: the negative effect on sales is present only when the discount is sufficiently high. Additional empirical analysis shows that deals displaying favorable third-party support, such as Facebook fans and online reviews, are more susceptible to this adverse discount effect. We draw related managerial implications.
The online appendix is available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" href="https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0772">https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0772</ext-link>.

References

[1]
Alba JW, Mela CF, Shimp TA, Urbany JE (1999) The effect of discount frequency and depth on consumer price judgments. J. Consumer Res. 26(2):99-114.
[2]
Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277-297.
[3]
Bagwell K, Riordan MH (1991) High and declining prices signal product quality. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(1):224-239.
[4]
Berry ST (1994) Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. RAND J. Econom. 25(2):242-262.
[5]
Berry ST, Haile PA (2014) Identification in differentiated products markets using market level data. Econometrica 82(5):1749-1797.
[6]
Berry ST, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63(4):841-890.
[7]
Bishop RC, Heberlein TA (1979) Measuring values of extra market goods: Are indirect measures biased? Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 61(5):926-930.
[8]
Blattberg RC, Briesch R, Fox EJ (1995) How promotions work. Marketing Sci. 14(3):G122-G132.
[9]
Bonifield C, Cole C, Schultz RL (2010) Product returns on the Internet: A case of mixed signals? J. Bus. Res. 63(9-10):1058-1065.
[10]
Boulding W, Kirmani A (1993) A consumer-side experimental examination of signaling theory: Do consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality? J. Consumer Res. 20(1):111-123.
[11]
Bresnahan TF, Stern S, Trajtenberg M (1997) Market segmentation and the sources of rents from innovation: Personal computers in the late 1980s. RAND J. Econom. 28:S17-S44.
[12]
Chen Y, Wang Q, Xie J (2011) Online social interactions: A natural experiment on word of mouth versus observational learning. J. Marketing Res. 48(2):238-254.
[13]
Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345-354.

Cited By

View all
  1. When Discounts Hurt Sales: The Case of Daily-Deal Markets

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Information Systems Research
    Information Systems Research  Volume 29, Issue 3
    September 2018
    253 pages

    Publisher

    INFORMS

    Linthicum, MD, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 September 2018
    Accepted: 02 December 2017
    Received: 30 April 2016

    Author Tags

    1. Groupon
    2. daily deal
    3. online markets
    4. price promotion
    5. quality concern
    6. uncertainty

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Consumer Equilibrium, Demand Effects, and Efficiency in Group BuyingManufacturing & Service Operations Management10.1287/msom.2022.108324:3(1437-1456)Online publication date: 1-May-2022
    • (2022)Seller Organization and Percentage Fee Design in the Daily Deal MarketInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2021.107033:4(1287-1302)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022
    • (2021)Dynamic Resource Allocation on Multi-Category Two-Sided PlatformsManagement Science10.1287/mnsc.2020.358667:2(984-1003)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021
    • (2021)Multidimensional Observational Learning in Social NetworksInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2021.099332:3(876-894)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021
    • (2021)A product strategy for daily deal campaigns utilizing demand expansion and consumer leakageElectronic Commerce Research10.1007/s10660-021-09519-323:3(1861-1883)Online publication date: 9-Nov-2021
    • (2021)A cross-site comparison of online review manipulation using Benford’s lawElectronic Commerce Research10.1007/s10660-020-09455-823:1(365-406)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2021
    • (2020)A Note on the Impact of Daily Deals on Local Retailers’ Online ReputationInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2020.093531:4(1132-1143)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020
    • (2020)Deal or No Deal? Online Deals, Retailer Heterogeneity, and Brand Evaluations in a Competitive EnvironmentInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2020.093331:4(1087-1106)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media