article

Status Differences in the Cognitive Activation of Social Networks

Authors:

Edward Bishop Smith,

Leigh ThompsonAuthors Info & Claims

Organization Science, Volume 23, Issue 1

Pages 67 - 82

https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0643

Published: 01 January 2012 Publication History

Abstract

We develop a dynamic cognitive model of network activation and show that people at different status levels spontaneously activate, or call to mind, different subsections of their networks when faced with job threat. Using a multimethod approach (General Social Survey data and a laboratory experiment), we find that, under conditions of job threat, people with low status exhibit a winnowing response (i.e., activating smaller and tighter subsections of their networks), whereas people with high status exhibit a widening response (i.e., activating larger and less constrained subsections of their networks). We integrate traditional network theories with cognitive psychology, suggesting that cognitively activating social networks is a precondition to mobilizing them. One implication is that narrowing the network in response to threat might reduce low-status group members' access to new information, harming their chances of finding subsequent employment and exacerbating social inequality.

References

[1]

Aaronson, D., D. G. Sullivan. 1998. The decline of job security in the 1990s: Displacement, anxiety and their effect on wage growth. Econom. Perspect. 22(1) 17-43.

[2]

Adler, N. E., E. S. Epel, G. Castellazzo, J. R. Ickovics. 2000. Relationship of subjective and objective social class with psychological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psych. 19(6) 586-592.

[3]

Ancona, D. G., D. F. Caldwell. 1992. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. 3(3) 321-341.

Digital Library

[4]

Anderson, C., A. D. Galinsky. 2006. Power, optimism, and risktaking. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 36(4) 511-536.

[5]

Bargh, J. A., M. Chen, L. Burrows. 1996. Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 71(2) 230-244.

[6]

Bearman, P. S., K. D. Everett. 1993. The structure of social protest, 1961-1983. Soc. Networks 15(2) 171-200.

[7]

Bernard, H. R., P. D. Killworth. 1977. Informant accuracy in social network data II. Human Comm. 4(1) 3-18.

[8]

Blau, P. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

[9]

Borgatti, S. P., R. Cross. 2003. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. 49(4) 432-445.

Digital Library

[10]

Bothner, M. S., E. B. Smith., H. C. White. 2010. A model of robust positions in social networks. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(3) 943-992.

[11]

Brass, D. J., M. E. Burkhardt. 1993. Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Acad. Management J. 36(3) 441-470.

[12]

Briñol, P., R. E. Petty, C. Valle, D. D. Rucker, A. Becerra. 2007. The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: A self-validation analysis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(6) 1040-1053.

[13]

Burt, R. S. 1984. Network items and the general social survey. Soc. Networks 6(4) 293-339.

[14]

Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

[15]

Burt, R. S. 2005. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Captial. Oxford University Press, New York.

[16]

Carley, K. M. 1986. An approach for relating social structure to cognitive structure. J. Math. Sociol. 12(2) 137-189.

[17]

Castilla, E. J. 2005. Social networks and employee performance in a call center. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(5) 1243-1283.

[18]

CBS News/New York Times Poll. 2010. The president, congress and sissatisfaction with government (February 5-10, 2010). CBS News/New York Times, New York, http://www.cbsnews.com/ htdocs/pdf/poll_Obama_Congress_021110.pdf.

[19]

Davis, N. J., R. V. Robinson. 1988. Class identification of men and women in the 1970s and 1980s. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 53(1) 103-112.

[20]

Dion, K. 1979. lntergroup conflict and intragroup cohesiveness. W. G. Austin, S. Worchel, eds. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Vol. 21. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA.

[21]

Dixon, J. C. 2006. The ties that bind and those that don't: Toward reconciling group threat and contact theories of prejudice. Soc. Forces 84(4) 2179-2204.

[22]

Duncan, O. D. 1984. Notes of Social Measurement, Historical and Critical. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

[23]

Easterbrook, J. A. 1959. The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psych. Rev. 66(3) 183-201.

[24]

Fein, S., S, J. Spencer. 1997. Prejudice as self-imagine maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 73(1) 31-44.

[25]

Fernandez, R. M., M. L. Sosa. 2005. Gendering the job: Networks and recruitment at a call center. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(3) 859-904.

[26]

Fernandez, R. M., N. Weinberg. 1997. Sifting and sorting: Personal contacts and hiring in a retail bank. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 62(6) 883-902.

[27]

Fischer, C. S. 2009. The 2004 GSS finding of shrunken social networks: An artifact? Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(4) 657-669.

[28]

Flynn, F. J., R. E. Reagans, E. T. Amanatullah, D. R. Ames. 2006. Helping one's way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91(6) 1123-1137.

[29]

Freeman, L. C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1(3) 215-239.

[30]

Galinsky, A. D., D. H. Grunefeld, J. C. Magee. 2003. From power to action. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 85(3) 453-466.

[31]

Galinsky, A. D., J. C. Magee, D. H. Gruenfeld, J. A. Whitson, K. A. Liljenquist. 2008. Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(6) 1450-1466.

[32]

Gentner, D., J. Loewenstein, L. Thompson, K. D. Forbus. 2009. Reviving inert knowledge: Analogical abstraction supports relational retrieval of past events. Cognitive Sci. 33(8) 1343-1382.

[33]

GfK Roper Public Affairs and Media. 2009. The AP-GfK Poll (February 12-17, 2009). GfK Custom Research North America, New York, http://www.ap-gfkpoll.com/pdf/AP_GfK _Poll_Feb_09_Topline.pdf.

[34]

Giessner, S. R., T. W. Schubert. 2007. High in the hierarchy: How vertical location and judgments of leaders' power are interrelated. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 104(1) 30-44.

[35]

Gladstein, D. L., N. P. Reilly. 1985. Group decision making under threat: The tycoon game. Acad. Management J. 28(3) 613-627.

[36]

Granovetter, M. 1974. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

[37]

Gruenfeld, D. H., M. E. Inesi, A. D. Galinsky, J. C. Magee. 2008. Power and the objectification of social targets. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(1) 111-127.

[38]

Higgins, E. T. 1996. Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. E. T. Higgins, A. W. Kruglanski, eds. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. Guilford, New York, 133-168.

[39]

Hodge, S. M., P. M. Siegl, P. H. Rossi. 1964. Occupational prestige in the United States, 1925-63. Amer. J. Sociol. 70(3) 286-302.

[40]

Hong, Y. Y., M. W. Morris, C. Y. Chiu, V. Benet-Martínez. 2000. Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. Amer. Psychologist 55(7) 709-720.

[41]

Horvat, E. M., E. B. Weininger, A. Lareau. 2003. From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relations between schools and parent networks. Amer. Ed. Res. J. 40(2) 319-351.

[42]

Janicik, G. A., R. P. Larrick. 2005. Social network schemas and the learning of incomplete networks. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(2) 348-364.

[43]

Keltner, D., D. H. Gruenfeld, C. Anderson. 2003. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psych. Rev. 110(2) 265-284.

[44]

Krackhardt, D. 1987. Cognitive social structures. Soc. Networks 9(2) 109-134.

[45]

Kraus, M. W., P. K. Piff, D. Keltner. 2009. Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 97(6) 992-1004.

[46]

Lareau, A. 2003. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. University of California Press, Berkeley.

[47]

Lin, N. 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

[48]

Lin, N., M. Dumin. 1986. Access to occupations through social ties. Soc. Networks 8(4) 365-385.

[49]

Mahler, J. 2009. GM and the fall of the black middle class. New York Times Magazine (June 28) MM30.

[50]

Marsden, P. V. 1987. Core discussion networks of Americans. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 52(1) 122-131.

[51]

Marsden, P. V. 1990. Network data and measurement. Annual Rev. Sociol. 16 435-463.

[52]

Marsden, P. V., J. S. Hurlbert. 1988. Social resources and mobility outcomes: A replication and extension. Soc. Forces 66(4) 1038-1059.

[53]

McLaren, L. M. 2003. Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. Soc. Forces 81(3) 909-936.

[54]

Menon, T., L. Thompson. 2007. Don't hate me because I'm beautiful: Self-enhancing biases in threat appraisal. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 104(1) 45-60.

[55]

Menon, T., L. Thompson, H.-S. Choi. 2006. Tainted knowledge vs. tempting knowledge: People avoid knowledge from internal rivals and seek knowledge from external rivals. Management Sci. 52(8) 1129-1144.

Digital Library

[56]

Michaelson, A., N. S. Contractor. 1992. Structural position and perceived similarity. Soc. Psych. Quart. 55(3) 300-310.

[57]

Moore, G. 1990. Structural determinants of men's and women's personal networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 55(5) 726-735.

[58]

Moreland, R. L., L. Argote, R. Krishnan. 1996. Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. J. L. Nye, M. Bower, eds. What's Social About Social Cognition? Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 57-84.

[59]

Morris, M. W., T. Menon, D. R. Ames. 2001. Culturally conferred conceptions of agency: A key to social perception of persons, groups, and other actors. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 5(2) 169-182.

[60]

Mouw, T. 2002. Are black workers missing the connection? The effect of spatial distance and employee referrals on interfirm racial segregation. Demography 39(3) 507-528.

[61]

Mouw, T. 2009. The Use of Social Networks Among Hispanic Workers: An Indirect Test of the Effects of Social Capital. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

[62]

Nadler, A. 1987. Determinants of help seeking behaviour: The effects of helper's similarity, task centrality and recipient's self esteem. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 17(1) 57-67.

[63]

Nadler, A. 1991. Help-seeking behavior: Psychological costs and instrumental benefits. M. S. Clark, ed. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 12. Sage, New York, 290-312.

[64]

Newman, K. S. 1988. Falling from Grace: Downward Mobility in the Age of Affluence. Free Press, New York.

[65]

Newman, K. S. 2000. No Shame in My Game: The Working Poor in the Inner City. Vintage, New York.

[66]

Osterman, P. 1999. Securing Prosperity: The American Labor Market: How It Has Changed and What to Do About It. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

[67]

Podolny, J. M., D. J. Phillips. 1996. The dynamics of organizational status. Indust. Corporate Change 5(2) 453-471.

[68]

Quillian, L. 1995. Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 60(4) 586-611.

[69]

Reagans, R., B. McEvily. 2003. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2) 240-267.

[70]

Reagans, R., E. Zuckerman, B. McEvily. 2004. How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(1) 101-133.

[71]

Rofé, Y. 1984. Stress and affiliation: A utility theory. Psych. Rev. 91(2) 235-250.

[72]

Roy, W. G. 1983. The interlocking directorate structure of the United States. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2) 248-257.

[73]

Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

[74]

Schachter, S. 1959. The Psychology of Affiliation. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA.

[75]

Schimel, J., J. Arndt, T. Pyszczynski, J. Greenberg. 2001. Being accepted for who we are: Evidence that social validation of the intrinsic self reduces general defensiveness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80(1) 35-52.

[76]

Schmidt, S. R. 1999. Long-run trends in workers' beliefs about their own job security: Evidence from the General Social Survey. J. Labor. Econom. 17(S4) S127-S141.

[77]

Shah, P. P. 2000. Network destruction: The structural implications of downsizing. Acad. Management J. 43(1) 101-112.

[78]

Sharone, O. 2007. Constructing unemployed job seekers as professional workers: The depoliticizing work-game of job searching. Qualitative Sociol. 30(4) 403-416.

[79]

Smith, S. S. 2005. "Don't put my name on it": Social capital activation and job-finding assistance among the black urban poor. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(1) 1-57.

[80]

Staw, B. M., L. E. Sandelands, J. E. Dutton. 1981. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multi-level analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 26(4) 501-524.

[81]

Steele, C. M. 1988. The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. L. Berkowitz, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 21. Academic Press, New York, 261-302.

[82]

Steele, C. M., J. Aronson. 1995. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 69(5) 797-811.

[83]

Stephens, N. M., M. G. Hamedani, H. R. Markus, H. B. Bergsieker, L. Eloul. 2009. Why did they "choose" to stay? Perspectives of Hurricane Katrina observers and survivors. Psych. Sci. 20(7) 878-886.

[84]

Turner, M. E., A. R. Pratkanis, P. Probasco, C. Leve. 1992. Threat, cohesion, and group effectiveness: Testing a social identity maintenance perspective on groupthink. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 63(5) 781-796.

[85]

Van De Ven, A. H., A. L. Delbecq, R. J. Koenig Jr. 1976. Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 41(2) 322-338.

[86]

Wacquant, L. J. D., W J. Wilson. 1989. The cost of racial and class exclusion in the inner city. Ann. Amer. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 501(1) 8-25.

[87]

Wasserman, S., K. Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

[88]

White, H. C. 1981. Where do markets come from? Amer. J. Sociol. 87(3) 517-547.

[89]

White, H. C. 1992. Identity and Control: How Social Formations Emerge. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

[90]

Wilson, W. J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

[91]

Winerip, M. 2009. Résumé writing for C.E.O.'s. New York Times (April 10) ST2.

[92]

Winship, C., R. D. Mare. 1992. Models for sample selection bias. Annual Rev. Sociol. 18 327-350.

[93]

Yakubovich, V. 2005. Weak ties, information, and influence: How workers find jobs in a local Russian labor market. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(3) 408-421.

Cited By

Yu SShea C(2024)The Company She SeeksOrganization Science10.1287/orsc.2020.1464035:3(853-887)Online publication date: 1-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2020.14640
Burt ROpper SHolm H(2022)Cooperation Beyond the NetworkOrganization Science10.1287/orsc.2021.146033:2(495-517)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2021.1460
Greenberg J(2021)Social Network Positions, Peer Effects, and Evaluation UpdatingOrganization Science10.1287/orsc.2020.141632:5(1174-1192)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2020.1416
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Why Do High-Status People Have Larger Social Networks? Belief in Status-Quality Coupling as a Driver of Network-Broadening Behavior and Social Network Size
Previous research has demonstrated that the size and reach of people’s social networks tend to be positively related to their social status. Although several explanations help to account for this relationship—for example, higher-status people may be part ...
Fear Recognition Ability Predicts Differences in Social Cognitive and Neural Functioning in Men

By testing the facial fear-recognition ability of 341 men in the general population, we show that 8.8% have deficits akin to those seen with acquired amygdala damage. Using psychological tests and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) we tested ...
Activation of inhibition: Diminishing impulsive behavior by direct current stimulation over the inferior frontal gyrus

A common feature of human existence is the ability to reverse decisions after they are made but before they are implemented. This cognitive control process, termed response inhibition, refers to the ability to inhibit an action once initiated and has ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Organization Science

Organization Science Volume 23, Issue 1

January-February 2012

298 pages

ISSN:1526-5455

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

INFORMS

Linthicum, MD, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 January 2012

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

18
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 03 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Yu SShea C(2024)The Company She SeeksOrganization Science10.1287/orsc.2020.1464035:3(853-887)Online publication date: 1-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2020.14640
Burt ROpper SHolm H(2022)Cooperation Beyond the NetworkOrganization Science10.1287/orsc.2021.146033:2(495-517)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2021.1460
Greenberg J(2021)Social Network Positions, Peer Effects, and Evaluation UpdatingOrganization Science10.1287/orsc.2020.141632:5(1174-1192)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2020.1416
Cao JSmith E(2021)Why Do High-Status People Have Larger Social Networks? Belief in Status-Quality Coupling as a Driver of Network-Broadening Behavior and Social Network SizeOrganization Science10.1287/orsc.2020.138132:1(111-132)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2020.1381
Wu LKane G(2021)Network-Biased Technical ChangeOrganization Science10.1287/orsc.2020.136832:2(273-292)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2020.1368
Byron KLandis B(2019)Relational Misperceptions in the WorkplaceOrganization Science10.1287/orsc.2019.128531:1(223-242)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2019.1285
Romero DUzzi BKleinberg J(2019)Social Networks under StressACM Transactions on the Web10.1145/329546013:1(1-24)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3295460
Prato MFerraro F(2018)StarstruckOrganization Science10.1287/orsc.2018.120429:5(755-774)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2018.1204
Carnabuci GEmery CBrinberg D(2018)Emergent Leadership Structures in Informal GroupsOrganization Science10.1287/orsc.2017.117129:1(118-133)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/orsc.2017.1171
Smith ERand W(2018)Simulating Macro-Level Effects from Micro-Level ObservationsManagement Science10.1287/mnsc.2017.287764:11(5405-5421)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2877
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents