Take Your Time? How Activity Timing Affects Organizational Learning and Performance Outcomes
Authors: 
Vinit Desai, Peter MadsenAuthors Info & Claims
Vinit Desai, Peter MadsenAuthors Info & ClaimsAbstract
Organizational learning theory has long examined how organizations learn to perform better as they accumulate experience. Although experience accumulation is inherently related to the timing of the repeated activities carried out by an organization, the direct relationship between activity timing and organizational learning has not been examined explicitly in the literature and remains an open question. Organizational learning theory contains two competing perspectives on how timing should impact learning—one suggesting that iterating faster is better for learning and one suggesting that taking more time between iterations is more helpful. Here, we reconcile these perspectives and develop a theory about the boundary conditions between them, arguing that, in general, iterating more rapidly enhances learning but that iterations of novel or complex activities, or ones following recent failure, benefit from a slower pace. We conduct tests of this theoretical perspective using data from the entire history of the orbital satellite launch industry from 1957–2017, and we find broad support for our theory and hypotheses.
References
[1]
Anand G, Gray J, Siemsen E (2012) Decay, shock, and renewal: Operational routines and process entropy in the pharmaceutical industry. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1700–1716.
[2]
Argote L, Epple D (1990) Learning-curves in manufacturing. Science 247(4945):920–924.
[3]
Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1123–1137.
[4]
Argote L, Beckman SL, Epple D (1990) The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. 36(2):140–154.
[5]
Arthur JB, Huntley CL (2005) Ramping up the organizational learning curve: Assessing the impact of deliberate learning on organizational performance under gainsharing. Acad. Management J. 48(6):1159–1170.
[6]
Bakker RM, Shepherd DA (2017) Pull the plug or take the plunge: Multiple opportunities and the speed of venturing decisions in the Australian mining industry. Acad. Management J. 60(1):130–155.
[7]
Baum JA, Dahlin K (2007) Aspiration performance and railroads’ patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organ. Sci. 18(3):368–385.
[8]
Bingham CB, Davis JP (2012) Learning sequences: Their existence, effect, and evolution. Acad. Management J. 55(3):611–641.
[9]
Boh WF, Slaughter SA, Espinosa JA (2007) Learning from experience in software development: A multi-level analysis. Management Sci. 53(8):1315–1331.
[10]
CAIB (2003) Columbia accident investigation board report. vol. 1. Accessed June 12, 2019, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20030066167.
[11]
Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, New York).
[12]
Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35:128–152.
[13]
Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
[14]
Darr ED, Argote L, Epple D (1995) The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. 41(11):1750–1762.
[15]
de Holan PM (2011) Agency in voluntary organizational forgetting. J. Management Inquiry 20(3):317–322.
[16]
de Holan PM, Phillips N (2004) Remembrance of things past? The dynamics of organizational forgetting. Management Sci. 50(11):1603–1613.
[17]
Diwas KC, Staats BR, Gino F (2013) Learning from my success and from others’ failure: Evidence from minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 59(11):2435–2449.
[18]
Dokko G, Wilk SL, Rothbard NP (2009) Unpacking prior experience: How career history affects job performance. Organ. Sci. 20(1):51–68.
[19]
Eggers JP (2012) All experience is not created equal: Learning, adapting, and focusing in product portfolio management. Strategic Management J. 33(3):315–335.
[20]
Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. 21(10-11):1105–1121.
[21]
Elfenbein DW, Knott AM (2015) Time to exit: Rational, behavioral, and organizational delays. Strategic Management J. 36(7):957–975.
[22]
Elfenbein DW, Knott AM, Croson R (2017) Equity stakes and exit: An experimental approach to decomposing exit delay. Strategic Management J. 38(2):278–299.
[23]
Feldman MS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11(6):611–629.
[24]
Gaba V, Bhattacharya S (2012) Aspirations, innovation, and corporate venture capital: A behavioral perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 6(2):178–199.
[25]
Gavetti G, Greve HR, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 6:1–40.
[26]
Greve HR (1998) Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):58–86.
[27]
Haas MR (2006) Knowledge gathering, team capabilities, and project performance in challenging work environments. Management Sci. 52(8):1170–1184.
[28]
Haerem T, Pentland BT, Miller KD (2015) Task complexity: Extending a core concept. Acad. Management Rev. 40(3):446–460.
[29]
Haunschild PR, Sullivan B (2002) Learning from complexity: Effects of prior accidents and incidents on airlines’ learning. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4):609–643.
[30]
Haunschild P, Polidoro F, Chandler D (2015) Organizational oscillation between learning and forgetting: The dual role of serious errors. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1682–1701.
[31]
Hawk A, Pacheco-de-Almeida G, Yeung B (2013) Fast-mover advantages: Speed capabilities and entry into the emerging submarket of Atlantic Basin LNG. Strategic Management J. 34(13):1531–1550.
[32]
Henderson J, Cool K (2003) Learning to time capacity expansions: An empirical analysis of the worldwide petrochemical industry, 1975-95. Strategic Management J. 24(5):393–413.
[33]
Iyer DN, Miller KD (2008) Performance feedback, slack, and the timing of acquisitions. Acad. Management J. 51(4):808–822.
[34]
Judge GG, Griffiths WE, Hill RC, Lutkepohl H, Lee TC (1985) The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York).
[35]
Katila R, Chen EL (2008) Effects of search timing on innovation: The value of not being in sync with rivals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):593–625.
[36]
Kim T, Rhee M (2009) Exploration and exploitation: Internal variety and environmental dynamism. Strategic Organ. 7(1):11–41.
[37]
King AW (2007) Disentangling interfirm and intrafirm causal ambiguity: A conceptual model of causal ambiguity and sustainable competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 32(1):156–178.
[38]
King AW, Zeithaml CP (2001) Competencies and firm performance: Examining the causal ambiguity paradox. Strategic Management J. 22(1):75–99.
[39]
Konlechner S, Ambrosini V (2019) Issues and trends in causal ambiguity research: A review and assessment. J. Management 45(6):2352–2386.
[40]
Kownatzki M, Walter J, Floyd SW, Lechner C (2013) Corporate control and the speed of strategic business unit decision making. Acad. Management J. 56(5):1295–1324.
[41]
Lecuona JR, Reitzig M (2014) Knowledge worth having in ‘excess’: The value of tacit and firm-specific human resource slack. Strategic Management J. 35(7):954–973.
[42]
Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14:95–112.
[43]
Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.
[44]
Louis MR, Sutton RI (1991) Switching cognitive gears: From habits of mind to active thinking. Human Relations 44(1):55–76.
[45]
Luoma J, Ruutu S, King AW, Tikkanen H (2017) Time delays, competitive interdependence, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 38(3):506–525.
[46]
Madsen PM, Desai V (2010) Failing to learn? The effects of failure and success on organizational learning in the global orbital launch vehicle industry. Acad. Management J. 53(3):451–476.
[47]
March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.
[48]
Morris MW, Moore PC (2000) The lessons we (don’t) learn: Counterfactual thinking and organizational accountability after a close call. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(4):737–765.
[49]
Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1):14–37.
[50]
Nonaka I, von Krogh G (2009) Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organ. Sci. 20(3):635–652.
[51]
Nonaka I, Toyama R, Nagata A (2000) A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: A new perspective on the theory of the firm. Indust. Corporate Change 9(1):1–20.
[52]
Nonaka I, von Krogh G, Voelpel S (2006) Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances. Organ. Stud. 27:1179–1208.
[53]
Ocasio W, Rhee L, Milner D (2020) Attention, knowledge, and organizational learning. Argote L, Levine J, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 81–94.
[54]
Pacheco-de-Almeida G (2010) Erosion, time compression, and self-displacement of leaders in hypercompetitive environments. Strategic Management J. 31(13):1498–1526.
[55]
Pacheco-de-Almeida G, Hawk A, Yeung B (2015) The right speed and its value. Strategic Management J. 36(2):159–176.
[56]
Pisano GP, Bohmer RMJ, Edmondson AC (2001) Organizational differences in rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 47(6):752–768.
[57]
Posen HE, Levinthal DA (2012) Chasing a moving target: Exploitation and exploration in dynamic environments. Management Sci. 58(3):587–601.
[58]
Powell TC, Lovallo D, Caringal C (2006) Causal ambiguity, management perception, and firm performance. Acad. Management Rev. 31(1):175–196.
[59]
Rerup C, Feldman M (2011) Routines as a source of change in organizational schema: The role of trial-and-error learning. Acad. Management J. 54:577–610.
[60]
Rockart SF, Wilson K (2019) Learning in cycles. Organ. Sci. 30(1):70–87.
[61]
Schilling MA, Vidal P, Ployhart RE, Marangoni A (2003) Learning by doing something else: Variation, relatedness, and the learning curve. Management Sci. 49(1):39–56.
[62]
Simonin BL (1999) Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management J. 20(7):595–623.
[63]
Staats BR, Gino F (2012) Specialization and variety in repetitive tasks: Evidence from a Japanese bank. Management Sci. 58(6):1141–1159.
[64]
Stock JH, Yogo M (2002) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. NBER Working Paper No. t0284, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
[65]
Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):27–43.
[66]
Szulanski G, Cappetta R, Jensen RJ (2004) When and how trustworthiness matters: Knowledge transfer and the moderating effect of causal ambiguity. Organ. Sci. 15(5):600–613.
[67]
Thompson P (2007) How much did the liberty shipbuilders forget? Management Sci. 53(6):908–918.
[68]
Tsoukas H (2005) Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology (Oxford University Press).
[69]
Walsh JP, Ungson GR (1991) Organizational memory. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):57–91.
[70]
Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):357–381.
[71]
Wiersma E (2007) Conditions that shape the learning curve: Factors that increase the ability and opportunity to learn. Management Sci. 53(12):1903–1915.
[72]
Zollo M (2009) Superstitious learning with rare strategic decisions: Theory and evidence from corporate acquisitions. Organ. Sci. 20(5):894–908.
[73]
Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13(3):339–351.
Recommendations
Technological distinctive competencies and organizational learning: Effects on organizational innovation to improve firm performance
This paper analyzes how top management support of technology influences the generation of technological skills, technological distinctive competencies and organizational learning. The research also examines the effects of technological distinctive ...
An Empirical Study on the Structure of Organizational Learning and Organizational Performance
ICALT '08: Proceedings of the 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning TechnologiesThis paper does an empirical study on the structure of organizational learning and organizational performance based on the core competitive capability view. The structure provides a path that how is the organizational learning interdependent with ...
Organizational Learning from Extreme Performance Experience: The Impact of Success and Recovery Experience
This paper argues that two different types of a firm's own extreme performance experiences---success and recovery---and their interactions can generate survival-enhancing learning. Although these types of experience often represent valuable sources of ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
September-October 2022
385 pages
Copyright © 2021, INFORMS.
Publisher
INFORMS
Linthicum, MD, United States
Publication History
Published: 01 September 2022
Accepted: 28 April 2021
Received: 05 September 2019
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 12 Sep 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in