Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

Comparing two ontologies

Published: 01 May 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Ontologies play an important role in applications related to knowledge management, natural language processing, information retrieval, etc. As a result, a large number of ontologies have been developed rapidly. Once an ontology is created, it can be used by many different applications. Such applications may use the entire ontology or only a part of it. Furthermore, they may use a part of the ontology and then extend it by adding more knowledge. Since ontologies which are used by different organisations may be related, there is a need to check these relationships. This paper presents an algorithm that compares two ontologies to determine their relationship. A semantic web service discovery application is introduced to highlight the motivation of the algorithm.

References

[1]
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J. and Lassila, O. (2001) 'The semantic web', Scientific American, Vol. 284, No. 5, pp.34-43.
[2]
Carroll, J.J. (2002) 'Matching RDF graphs', Paper presented at the First International Semantic Web Conference on the Semantic Web, Sardinia, Italy, pp.5-15.
[3]
Gruber, T.R. (1993) A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications, Academic Press.
[4]
Heflin, J. and Pan, Z. (2004) 'A model theoretic semantics for ontology versioning', Paper presented at the Semantic Web-ISWC 2004, Third International Semantic Web Conference, Hiroshima, Japan, pp.62-76.
[5]
I3CON (2004) Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems (PerMIS) Workshop, NIST, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, 25 August.
[6]
Jaro, M.A. (1989) 'Advances in record-linkage methodology as applied to matching the 1985 census of Tampa', Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 89, pp.414-420.
[7]
Kalyanpur, A., Parsia, B. and Hendler, J. (2005) 'A tool for working with web ontologies', International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp.36-49.
[8]
Klein, M., Fensel, D., Kiryakov, A. and Ognyanov, D. (2002a) 'Ontology versioning and change detection on the web', Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Spain, Vol. 2473, pp.197-212.
[9]
Klein, M., Kiryakov, A., Ognyanoff, A. and Fensel, D. (2002b) 'Finding and specifying relations between ontology versions', Paper presented at the ECAI-02 Workshop on Ontologies and Semantic Interoperability, Lyon.
[10]
Maedche, A. and Staab, S. (2002) 'Measuring similarity between ontologies', Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Ontologies and the Semantic Web, Sigüenza, Spain, pp.251-263.
[11]
McGuinness, D. and Harmelen, F.v. (2003) 'Web Ontology Language (OWL) overview', http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-owl-features-20030331/.
[12]
Miller, G.A. (1995) 'WordNet: a lexical database for English', Communications of the ACM, Vol. 38, No. 11, pp.39-41.
[13]
Noy, N.F. and Musen, M.A. (2004) 'Using PROMPT ontology-comparison tools in the EON ontology alignment contest', Paper presented at the Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-Based Tools (EON2004) at the Third International Conference on the Semantic Web (ISWC-2004), Hiroshima, Japan.
[14]
Oundhankar, S., Verma, K., Sivashanugam, K., Sheth, A. and Miller, J. (2005) 'Discovery of web services in a multi-ontologies and federated registry environment', International Journal of Web Services Research, Vol. 1, No. 3.
[15]
Wang, J.Z. and Ali, F. (2005) 'An efficient ontology comparison tool for semantic web applications', Paper presented at the 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI 2005), Compiegne, France, pp.372-378.
[16]
Wang, J.Z., Ali, F. and Appaneravanda, R. (2005) 'A web service for efficient ontology comparison', Paper presented at the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2005), Orlando, Florida, USA, pp.843-844.
[17]
Wu, Z. and Palmer, M. (1994) 'Verb semantics and lexical selection', Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Las Cruces, New Mexico, pp.133-138.

Cited By

View all
  • (2010)Alignment-based measure of the distance between potentially common parts of lightweight ontologiesProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Ontology Matching - Volume 68910.5555/2878593.2878598(49-60)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2010

Index Terms

  1. Comparing two ontologies
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology
    International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology  Volume 5, Issue 1
    May 2009
    129 pages
    ISSN:1476-1289
    EISSN:1741-9212
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    Inderscience Publishers

    Geneva 15, Switzerland

    Publication History

    Published: 01 May 2009

    Author Tags

    1. ontologies
    2. ontology comparison
    3. semantic web
    4. web service discovery
    5. web services

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2010)Alignment-based measure of the distance between potentially common parts of lightweight ontologiesProceedings of the 5th International Conference on Ontology Matching - Volume 68910.5555/2878593.2878598(49-60)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2010

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media