Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.2312/eurovisshort.20171139guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
research-article

Readability and precision in pictorial bar charts

Published: 12 June 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Bar charts embellished with unique artistic styles, or made to look like real objects, are common in information graphics. Embellishments are typically considered detrimental to readability and accuracy, since they add clutter and noise. Previous work has found that some of the shapes used, like rounded tops, triangles, etc., decreased accuracy when judging relative and absolute sizes, while T-shaped bars even showed a slight increase relative to the basic bar chart.
In this paper, we report on a study that adds pictorial elements to bar charts of four different shapes tested previously, thus also including the elements of color and texture.
We find that pictorial bar charts reduce accuracy, but not beyond the effect already observed for their shape. They also do not significantly increase response time. Embellished bar charts may not be as problematic as commonly assumed.

References

[1]
{BARM*12} Borgo R., Abdul-Rahman A., Mohamed F., Grant P. W., Reppa I., Floridi L., Chen M.: An empirical study on using visual embellishments in visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 12 (2012), 2759--2768.
[2]
{BMG*10} Bateman S., Mandryk R. L., Gutwin C., Genest A., McDine D., Brooks C.: Useful junk?: the effects of visual embellishment on comprehension and memorability of charts. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2010), ACM, pp. 2573--2582.
[3]
{BVB*13} Borkin M. A., Vo A. A., Bylinskii Z., Isola P., Sunkavalli S., Oliva A., Pfister H.: What makes a visualization memorable. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (2013), 2306--2315.
[4]
{CM84} Cleveland W. S., McGill R.: Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79, 387 (1984), 531--554.
[5]
{EGCH06} Elzer S., Green N., Carberry S., Hoffman J.: A model of perceptual task effort for bar charts and its role in recognizing intention. User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction 16, 1 (2006), 1--30.
[6]
{HB10} Heer J., Bostock M.: Crowdsourcing graphical perception: using Mechanical Turk to assess visualisation design. ACM Human Factors in Computing Systems (2010), 203--212.
[7]
{HKF15} Haroz S., Kosara R., Franconeri S. L.: ISOTYPE Visualization - Working Memory, Performance, and Engagement with Pictographs. In Proceedings CHI (2015), pp. 1191--1200.
[8]
{NS12} Newman G. E., Scholl B. J.: Bar graphs depicting averages are perceptually misinterpreted: The within-the-bar bias. Psychonomic bulletin & review 19, 4 (2012), 601--607.
[9]
{SHK15} Skau D., Harrison L., Kosara R.: An evaluation of the impact of visual embellishments in bar charts. Computer Graphics Forum (Proceedings EuroVis) 34, 3 (2015), 221--230.
[10]
{TSA14} Talbot J., Setlur V., Anand A.: Four Experiments on the Perception of Bar Charts. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2014).
[11]
{ZK10} Ziemkiewicz C., Kosara R.: Laws of Attraction: From Perceptual Forces to Conceptual Similarity. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16, 6 (2010), 1009--1016.
[12]
{ZLTS98} Zacks J., Levy E., Tversky B., Schiano D. J.: Reading bar graphs: Effects of extraneous depth cues and graphical context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 4, 2 (1998), 119.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Embellishments Revisited: Perceptions of Embellished Visualisations Through the Viewer's LensIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332691430:1(1424-1434)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Visualisations with semantic iconsInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103343191:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2024
  • (2023)A Review and Collation of Graphical Perception Knowledge for Visualization RecommendationProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581349(1-16)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
EuroVis '17: Proceedings of the Eurographics/IEEE VGTC Conference on Visualization: Short Papers
June 2017
160 pages

Publisher

Eurographics Association

Goslar, Germany

Publication History

Published: 12 June 2017

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Embellishments Revisited: Perceptions of Embellished Visualisations Through the Viewer's LensIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332691430:1(1424-1434)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Visualisations with semantic iconsInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103343191:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2024
  • (2023)A Review and Collation of Graphical Perception Knowledge for Visualization RecommendationProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581349(1-16)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2022)A Mixed-Initiative Approach to Reusing Infographic ChartsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2021.311485628:1(173-183)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media