Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Study on longitudinal emission reduction investment of supply chain and government’s subsidy policy

Published: 01 January 2018 Publication History

Abstract

 The relation between longitudinal emission reduction investment of supply chain enterprises and the government’s subsidy policy is studied in this paper, the game model against subsidy of the government for emission reduction investment of manufacture and retailer is developed. This study analyzes the optimal investment of enterprises and the optimal emission reduction subsidy of the government under the Nash and Stackelberg game conditions. The results show that the government’s emission reduction subsidies for two parties on the supply chain, as well as the benefits to such two parties, are affected by the cooperative relationship in the supply chain. That is, manufacturer and retailer are in the highest position in the Nash game, followed by the Stackelberg game and the lowest in central decisions. Comparing the subsidy differences of the government in the emission reduction investment by manufacturer and retailer under different force structures, the longitudinal emission reduction investment in the supply chain and the government’s subsidy policy under different game conditions are concluded.

References

[1]
Zhang L.H., Wang J.G. and You J.X., Consumer environmental awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products, European Journal of Operational Research 241 (2015), 63–73.
[2]
Li Y.D. and Zhao D.Z., Research on R & D cost allocation comparison for low-carbon supply chain based on government’s subsidies, Soft Science 28(2) (2014), 21–31.
[3]
Kuo T.C., Hong I.H. and Lin S.C., Do carbon taxes work? Analysis of government policies and enterprise strategies in equilibrium, Journal of Cleaner Production 139 (2016), 337–346.
[4]
Wang Q.P., Zhao D.Z. and He L.F., Contracting emission reduction for supply chains considering market low-carbon preference, Journal of Cleaner Production 120 (2016), 72–84.
[5]
Li Y.D., Zhao D.Z. and Xia L.J., Governmental subsidy policy for enterprises’ cooperative behavior in emission reduction in low-carbon supply chain, Operations Research and Management Science 23(4) (2014), 1–11.
[6]
Meng F.S. and Han B., Research on impact of government environmental regulation on enterprises’ low carbon technology innovation behavior, Forecasting 36(1) (2017), 74–80.
[7]
Poyago-Theotoky J., The organization of R&D and environmental policy, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 62(1) (2007), 63–75.
[8]
Neicu D., Teirlinck P. and Kelchtermans S., Dipping in the policy mix: Do R&D subsidies foster behavioral additionality effects of R&D tax credits? Economics of Innovation and New Technology 25(3) (2016), 218–239.
[9]
Wang C.X., Wang W. and Huang R.B., Supply chain enterprise operations and government carbon tax decisions considering carbon emissions, Journal of Cleaner Production 152 (2017), 271–280.
[10]
Madani S.R. and Rasti-Barzoki M., Sustainable supply chain management with pricing, greening and governmental tariffs determining strategies: A game-theoretic approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering 105 (2017), 287–298.
[11]
Li Y.D., Xie X.P. and Ying G., Research on supply chain collaboration sharing contract and decision- making mechanism under the limitation of carbon emission, Chinese Journal of Management Science 24(3) (2016), 61–70.
[12]
Ghosh D. and Shah J., Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract, International Journal of Production Economics 164(C) (2015), 319–329.
[13]
Hua G., Cheng T. and Wang S., Managing carbon footprints in inventory management, International Journal of Production Economics 132(2) (2011), 178–185.
[14]
Bouchery Y., Ghaffari A., Jemai Z., et al., Impact of coordination on costs and carbon emissions for a two-echelon serial economic order quantity problem, European Journal of Operational Research 260(2) (2016), 520–533.
[15]
Hoen K.M.R., Tan T., Fransoo J.C., et al., Switching transport modes to meet voluntary carbon emission targets, Transportation Science 48(4) (2013), 592–608.
[16]
Chaabane A., Ramudhin A. and Paquet M., Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme, International Journal of Production Economics 135(1) (2012), 37–49.
[17]
Shaw K., Irfan M., Shankar R., et al., Low carbon chance constrained supply chain network design problem: A benders decomposition based approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering 98 (2016), 483–497.
[18]
Benjaafar S., Li Y.Z. and Daskin M., Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: Insights from simple models, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 10(1) (2013), 99–116.
[19]
Qi Q., Wang J. and Bai Q.G., Pricing decision of a two-echelon supply chain with one supplier and two retailers under a carbon cap regulation, Journal of Cleaner Production 151 (2017), 286–302.
[20]
Qi X.K. and Cheng H., Study on game theory-based low-carbon supply chain cost investment incentives, An Academic Edition of China Management Magazine 8 (2011), 1–3.

Index Terms

  1. Study on longitudinal emission reduction investment of supply chain and government’s subsidy policy
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Information & Contributors

            Information

            Published In

            cover image Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology
            Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology  Volume 34, Issue 2
            Artificial Intelligent Techniques and its Applications
            2018
            460 pages

            Publisher

            IOS Press

            Netherlands

            Publication History

            Published: 01 January 2018

            Author Tags

            1. Low-carbon supply chain
            2. emission reduction investment
            3. government’s subsidy
            4. game theory

            Qualifiers

            • Research-article

            Contributors

            Other Metrics

            Bibliometrics & Citations

            Bibliometrics

            Article Metrics

            • 0
              Total Citations
            • 0
              Total Downloads
            • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
            Reflects downloads up to 31 Jan 2025

            Other Metrics

            Citations

            View Options

            View options

            Figures

            Tables

            Media

            Share

            Share

            Share this Publication link

            Share on social media