article

Selecting a Systems Development Methodology: A Contingency Framework

Authors:

Mohamed El Louadi,

Yannis A. Pollalis,

James T.C. TengAuthors Info & Claims

Information Resources Management Journal, Volume 4, Issue 1

Pages 11 - 20

https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.1991010102

Published: 01 January 1991 Publication History

Abstract

Uncertainty and complexity are inherent characteristics of a new information system. They occur at the beginning of the project and with different intensities during development depending on the system's type. Based on a review of the literature, it is argued that uncertainty and complexity can be used to derive the most suitable development strategy for a given project. A framework integrating system types and their corresponding development strategies is offered and justifications supplied. General guidelines concerning the application of the framework are provided for the practicing managers.

References

[1]

Alavi, M. (1984a), An Assessment of the Prototyping Approach to Information Systems Development, Communications of the ACM, 27(6), 556-563.

Digital Library

[2]

Alavi, M. (1984b), The Evolution of Information Systems Development Approaches: Some Field Observations, Data Base, 15(3), 19-24.

Digital Library

[3]

Alter, S. (1977), A Taxonomy of Decision Support Systems, Sloan Management Review, 19(1), 39-56.

[4]

Benjamin, R.J. (1982), Information Technology in the 1990's: A Long-Range Planning Scenario, MIS Quarterly, 6(2), 11-31.

Digital Library

[5]

Berrisford, I. and Wetherbe, J. (1979), Heuristic Development: A Redesign of Systems Design, MIS Quarterly, 3(1), 11-19.

Digital Library

[6]

Burns, R.N. and Dennis, A.R. (1985), Selecting the appropriate application development methodology, Data Base, 17(1), 19-23.

Digital Library

[7]

Canning, R.G. (1981), Developing Systems by Prototyping, EDP Analyzer, 19(9), 1-12.

[8]

Cerveny, R.P., Garrity, E.J., and Sanders, G.L. (1985), The Application of Prototyping to Systems Development: A Rationale and Model, Journal of Management Information Systems, 3(2), 52-62.

Digital Library

[9]

Cerveny, R.P., Garrity, E.J., and Sanders, G.L. (1990), A Problem-Solving Perspective on Systems Development, Journal of Management Information Systems, 6(4), 103-128.

Digital Library

[10]

Cerveny, R.P., Garrity, E.J., Hunt, R.G., Kirs, P.J., Sanders, G.L. and Sipior J.C. (1987), Why Software Prototyping Works, Datamation, 33(16), 97-103.

[11]

Davis, G.B. (1982), Strategies for Information Requirements Determination, IBM Systems Journal, 21(1), 4-30.

Digital Library

[12]

Dennis, A.R., Burns, R.N., and Gallupe, R.B. (1987), Phased Design: A Mixed Methodology for Application Systems Development, Data Base, 18(4), 31-37.

Digital Library

[13]

Elam, P.G., Choosing Between System Development Alternatives, Journal of Systems Management, 31(9), 36-40.

[14]

Ginzberg, M.J. and Ariav, G. (1986), Methodologies for DSS Analysis and Design: A Contingency Approach to their Application, Proceedings of 1986 International Conference in Information Systems, 46-56.

[15]

Gorry, G.A. and Scott Morton, M.S. (1971), A Framework for Management Information Systems, Sloan Management Review, 13(1), Fall, 55-70.

[16]

Gremillion, L.L. and Pyburn, P. (1983), Breaking the Systems Development Bottleneck, Harvard Business Review, 61(2), 130-137.

[17]

Jenkins, A.M. (1985), Prototyping: A Methodology for the Design and Development of Application Systems, Spectrum, 2(2).

[18]

Johnson, J.R. (1983), A Prototypical Success Story, Datamation, 251-256.

[19]

Keen, P.G.W. and Gambino, T.J. (1983), Building a Decision Support System: The Mythical Man-Month Revisited, in Building Expert Systems, J.L. Bennett (Ed.), Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 133-172.

[20]

Mahmood, M.A. (1987), Systems Development Methods-A Comparative Investigation, MIS Quarterly, 293-310.

Digital Library

[21]

Martin, J. (1982), Application Development without Programmers, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.

[22]

McFarlan, F.W. (1981), Portfolio Approach to Information Systems, Harvard Business Review, 59(5), 142-150.

[23]

Meador, C.L., Guyote, M.J. and Rosenfeld, W.L. (1986), Decision Support Planning and Analysis: The Problems of getting Large-Scale DSS Started, MIS Quarterly, 10(2), 159-177.

Digital Library

[24]

Miller, R. (1988), Custom Software in 120 days or your money back, Managing Automation, 3(3), 20-21.

[25]

Murdick, R.G. (1970), MIS Development Procedures, Journal of Systems Management, 21(12), 22-26.

[26]

Naumann, J.D. and Davis, G.B., A Contingency Theory to Select an Information Requirements Determination Methodology, Proceedings of the Second Software Life Cycle Management Workshop, IEEE, August 1978, pp.63-65.

[27]

Naumann, J.D. and Jenkins, A.M. (1982), Prototyping: The New Paradigm for Systems Development, MIS Quarterly, 6(3), 29-44.

Digital Library

[28]

Pliskin, N. and Shoval, P. (1987), End-User Prototyping: Sophisticated Users Supporting System Development, Data Base, 18(4), 7-17.

Digital Library

[29]

Rockart, J.F. and Flannery, L.S. (1983), The Management of End-User Computing, Communications of the ACM, 26(10), 776-784.

Digital Library

[30]

Scott Morton, M.S. (1971), Management Decision Support Systems: Computer Based Support for Decision Making, Division of Research, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

[31]

Wetherbe, J.C. and Leitheiser, R.L. (1985), Information Centers: A Survey of Services, Decisions, Problems, and Successes, Journal of Information Systems Management, 2(3), 3-10.

[32]

Zmud, R. (1980), Management of Large Software Development Efforts, MIS Quarterly, 4(2), 45-55.

Digital Library

[33]

Zmud, R. (1983), Information Systems in Organizations, Scott, Foresman, and Co.

Cited By

Riemenschneider CHardgrave BDavis F(2002)Explaining Software Developer Acceptance of MethodologiesIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2002.115828728:12(1135-1145)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2002
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TSE.2002.1158287
El Louadi MGalletta DSampler J(1998)An empirical validation of a contingency model for information require-ments determinationACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems10.1145/313310.31333329:3(31-51)Online publication date: 1-Jun-1998
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/313310.313333

Recommendations

Agile software development methodology: effects on perceived software quality and the cultural context for organizational adoption
Scrum-based Methodology for Distributed Software Development
ICGSE '11: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Global Software Engineering

There are many companies doing software development in a distributed way nowadays, due to the great benefits that it provides, however, this type of development also leads to multiple complications such as deteriorated communications. Among the most ...
A grounded theory of selecting lean and agile practices for software development
Abstract
The practices of lean and agile methods are important to manage and guide projects development in different situations. However, selecting the appropriate practices of lean and agile methods is a daunting task, owing to the availability of ...

image image

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Information Resources Management Journal

Information Resources Management Journal Volume 4, Issue 1

January 1991

32 pages

ISSN:1040-1628

EISSN:1533-7979

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

IGI Global

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 January 1991

Qualifiers

Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
0
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)0
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Riemenschneider CHardgrave BDavis F(2002)Explaining Software Developer Acceptance of MethodologiesIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2002.115828728:12(1135-1145)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2002
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TSE.2002.1158287
El Louadi MGalletta DSampler J(1998)An empirical validation of a contingency model for information require-ments determinationACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems10.1145/313310.31333329:3(31-51)Online publication date: 1-Jun-1998
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/313310.313333

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents