Integrating Interactive Visualizations of Automatic Debugging Techniques on an Integrated Development Environment
Pages 42 - 59
Abstract
Automated debugging techniques based on statistical analysis of historical test executions data have recently received considerable attention due to their diagnostic capabilities. However, the tools that materialize such techniques suffer from a common, rather important shortcoming: the lack of effective diagnostic reports' visualizations. This limitation prevents the wide adoption of such tools, as it is difficult to understand the diagnostic reports yielded by them. To fill this gap, the authors propose a framework for integrating interactive visualizations of automatic debugging reports in a popular development environment namely, the Eclipse integrated development environment. The framework, coined GZoltar, provides several important features to aid the developer's efficiency to find the root cause of observed failures quickly, such as direct links to the source code editor. Furthermore, the authors report on the results of a user study conducted to assess GZoltar's effectiveness.
References
[1]
Abreu, R. 2009. Spectrum-based fault localization in embedded software. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology, NL.
[2]
Abreu, R., Zoeteweij, P., & Van Gemund, A. J. C. 2009. A practical evaluation of spectrum-based fault localization. Journal of Systems and Software, 8211, 1780-1792.
[3]
Agrawal, H., de Millo, R., & Spafford, E. 1991. An execution backtracking approach to program debugging. IEEE Software.
[4]
Balzer, R. M. 1969. EXDAMS: Extendible debugging and monitoring system. In Proceedings of the AFIPS Spring Joint Conference, AFIPS Press.
[5]
Bouillon, P., Krinke, J., Meyer, N., & Steimann, F. 2007, Ezunit: A framework for associating failed unit tests with potential programming errors. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming XP'07. Springer.
[6]
Burnette, E. 2005. Eclipse IDE pocket guide. O'Reilly Media, Inc.
[7]
Dale, C., & Anderson, T. 2009. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Safety-Critical Systems Symposium on Safety-Critical Systems: Problems, Process and Practice. Springer Publishing Company, Inc.
[8]
Geer, D. 2005. Eclipse becomes the dominant Java IDE. Computer, 387, 16-18.
[9]
Hailpern, B., & Santhanam, P. 2002. Software debugging, testing, and verification. IBM Systems Journal, 411, 4-12.
[10]
Harrold, M., Rothermel, G., Wu, R., & Yi, L. 1998. An empirical investigation of program spectra. ACM SIGPLAN Notices.
[11]
Hoffmann, M. R. 2011, JaCoCo. Retrieved from http://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/
[12]
Janssen, T., Abreu, R., & Van Gemund, A. J. C. 2009, Zoltar: A toolset for automatic fault localization. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering pp. 662-664. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
[13]
Johnson, B., & Shneiderman, B. 1991. Tree-maps: A spacefilling approach to the visualization of hierarchical information structures. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Visualization, Los Alamitos, CA pp. 284-291. IEEE Computer Society Press.
[14]
Jones, J. A., Harrold, M. J., & Stasko, J. T. 2002. Visualization of test information to assist fault localization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering ICSE'02, ACM Press.
[15]
Ko, A. J., & Myers, B. A. 2009. Finding causes of program output with the Java Whyline. In Proceedings of the Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI'2009 pp. 1569-1578.
[16]
Lintern, R., Michaud, J., Storey, M.-A., & Wu, X. 2003. Plugging-in visualization: experiences integrating a visualization tool with eclipse. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM Symposium on Software Visualization SoftVis'03 pp. 47-56. New York, NY: ACM.
[17]
McCullough, M. 2006. Developing eclipse plugins. Linux Journal, 143, 11.
[18]
Nielsen, J., & Landauer, T. K. 1993. A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems . Transport, 206, 206-213.
[19]
O'Neal, M., & Stewart, T. 1996. Awt programming for Java 1st ed. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Co. Inc.
[20]
Patterson, D., Brown, A., Broadwell, P., Candea, G., Chen, M., & Cutler, J. ' Treuhaft, N. 2002, Recovery oriented computing ROC: Motivation, definition, techniques, and case studies, Technical Report UCB/CSD-02-1175, University of California at Berkeley, CA.
[21]
Riboira, A. 2011. GZoltar: A graphical debugger interface. Master's thesis, University of Porto, Portugal.
[22]
Riboira, A. 2011. GZoltar: Fixing faults video. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkimgY0NGSc
[23]
RTI. 2002. Planning report 02-3: The economic impacts of inadequate infrastructure for software testing. Planning report, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
[24]
Shreiner, D., & Group, T. K. O. A. W. 2009. OpenGL programming guide: The official guide to learning OpenGL, Versions 3.0 and 3.1 7th ed. Addison-Wesley Professional.
[25]
Stallman, R. 1994. Debugging with GDB - The GNU source level debugger. Free Software Foundation.
[26]
Stasko, J., Catrambone, R., Guzdial, M., & McDonald, K. 2000. An evaluation of space-filling information visualizations for depicting hierarchical structures. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 535, 663-694.
[27]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. 1990. DBX. - Debugging tools DBX, SunOS 4.1.1 ed.
[28]
Van Wijk, J. 2005. The value of visualization. In Proceedings of the Visualization 2005 VIS'05 pp. 79-86.
[29]
Wolff, D. 2005. Using opengl in java with jogl. The Journal of Computing Science in Small Colleges, 21, 223-224.
[30]
Zeller, A., & Lüütkehaus, D. 1996. DDD - A free graphical front-end for UNIX debuggers. ACM SIGPLAN Notices.
- Integrating Interactive Visualizations of Automatic Debugging Techniques on an Integrated Development Environment
Recommendations
Toward arbitrary mapping for debugging visualizations
ICSE '16: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering CompanionDespite the progress that has been made in the field of program visualization, programmers nowadays still rely on inserting extra code (e.g. print statements) to visualize complicated program states during debugging. There are many obstacles that have ...
Statistical debugging for real-world performance problems
OOPSLA '14Design and implementation defects that lead to inefficient computation widely exist in software. These defects are difficult to avoid and discover. They lead to severe performance degradation and energy waste during production runs, and are becoming ...
Deconstructing and restyling D3 visualizations
UIST '14: Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technologyThe D3 JavaScript library has become a ubiquitous tool for developing visualizations on the Web. Yet, once a D3 visualization is published online its visual style is difficult to change. We present a pair of tools for deconstructing and restyling ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Publisher
IGI Global
United States
Publication History
Published: 01 July 2012
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Article
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 0Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in