Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

A Modal Defeasible Reasoner of Deontic Logic for the Semantic Web

Published: 01 January 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Defeasible logic is a non-monotonic formalism that deals with incomplete and conflicting information, whereas modal logic deals with the concepts of necessity and possibility. These types of logics play a significant role in the emerging Semantic Web, which enriches the available Web information with meaning, leading to better cooperation between end-users and applications. Defeasible and modal logics, in general, and, particularly, deontic logic provide means for modeling agent communities, where each agent is characterized by its cognitive profile and normative system, as well as policies, which define privacy requirements, access permissions, and individual rights. Toward this direction, this article discusses the extension of DR-DEVICE, a Semantic Web-aware defeasible reasoner, with a mechanism for expressing modal logic operators, while testing the implementation via deontic logic operators, concerned with obligations, permissions, and related concepts. The motivation behind this work is to develop a practical defeasible reasoner for the Semantic Web that takes advantage of the expressive power offered by modal logics, accompanied by the flexibility to define diverse agent behaviours. A further incentive is to study the various motivational notions of deontic logic and discuss the cognitive state of agents, as well as the interactions among them.

References

[1]
Antoniou, G.,&Bikakis, A. 2007. DR-Prolog: A System for Defeasible Reasoning with Rules and Ontologies on the Semantic Web. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 192, 233-245.
[2]
Antoniou, G., Billington, D., Governatori, G.,&Maher, M. J. 2006. Embedding Defeasible Logic into Logic Programming. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 66, 703-735.
[3]
Antoniou, G., Dimaresis, N.,&Governatori, G. 2009. A Modal and Deontic Defeasible Reasoning System for Modelling Policies and Multi-Agent Systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 362, 4125-4134.
[4]
Antoniou, G., Skylogiannis, T., Bikakis, A.,&Bassiliades, N. 2007. DR-BROKERING: A Semantic Brokering System. Knowledge-Based Systems, 201, 61-72.
[5]
Antoniou, G.,&van Harmelen, F. 2004. A Semantic Web Primer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[6]
Artosi, A., Governatori, G.,&Sartor, G. 1996. Towards a computational treatment of deontic defeasibility. In M. Brown&J. Carmo Eds., Deontic Logic Agency and Normative Systems: Workshop on Computing pp. 27-46. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
[7]
Ashri, R., Payne, T., Marvin, D., Surridge, M.,&Taylor, S. 2004. Towards a Semantic Web Security Infrastructure. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Semantic Web Services pp. 84-91. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
[8]
Bassiliades, N., Antoniou, G.,&Vlahavas, I. 2006. A Defeasible Logic Reasoner for the Semantic Web. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 21, 1-41.
[9]
Bassiliades, N.,&Vlahavas, I. 2006. R-DEVICE: An Object-Oriented Knowledge Base System for RDF Metadata. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 22, 24-90.
[10]
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J.,&Lassila, O. 2001. The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 2845, 34-43.
[11]
Bieber, P.,&Cuppens, F. 1993. Expression of Confidentiality Policies with Deontic Logic. In Meyer, J. C.,&Wieringa, R. J. Eds., Deontic Logic in Computer Science: Normative System Specification pp. 103-123. Chichester, UK: John Wiley&Sons.
[12]
Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M.,&Venema, Y. 2001. Modal Logic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[13]
Boley, H. 2004. An Integrated Positional-Slotted Language for Semantic Web Knowledge. Retrieved from http://www.ruleml.org/submission/ruleml-shortation.html
[14]
Boley, H. 2006. The RuleML Family of Web Rule Languages: Invited talk. In Proceedings of 4th Workshop on Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reasoning, Budva, Montenegro LNCS 4187, pp.1-15.
[15]
Bonatti, P. A., Duma, C., Fuchs, N., Nejdl, W., Olmedilla, D., Peer, J.,&Shahmehri, N. 2006. Semantic Web Policies - a Discussion of Requirements and Research Issues. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference, Budva, Montenegro LNCS 4011, pp. 712-724.
[16]
Broersen, J., Dastani, M., Hulstijn, J., Huang, Z.,&van der Torre, L. 2001. The BOID Architecture: Conflicts between Beliefs, Obligations, Intentions and Desires. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Montreal, QC, Canada pp. 9-16. New York, NY: ACM.
[17]
Cohen, P. R.,&Levesque, H. J. 1990. Intention is Choice with Commitment. Artificial Intelligence, 422-3, 213-261.
[18]
Gottlob, G. 1992. Complexity Results for Nonmonotonic Logics. Journal of Logic and Computation, 2, 397-425.
[19]
Governatori, G. 2005. Representing Business Contracts in RuleML. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 142-3, 181-216.
[20]
Governatori, G., Hulstijn, J., Riveret, R.,&Rotolo, A. 2007. Characterising Deadlines in Temporal Modal Defeasible Logic. In Proceedings of the 20th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence AI 2007 pp. 486-496.
[21]
Governatori, G., Padmanabhan, V., Rotolo, A.,&Sattar, A. 2009. A Defeasible Logic for Modelling Policy-based Intentions and Motivational Attitudes. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 173, 227-265.
[22]
Governatori, G.,&Rotolo, A. 2004. Defeasible Logic: Agency, Intention and Obligation. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science, Madeira, Portugal pp. 114-128.
[23]
Governatori, G.,&Rotolo, A. 2008a. BIO Logical Agents: Norms, Beliefs, Intentions in Defeasible Logic. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems, 171, 36-69.
[24]
Governatori, G.,&Rotolo, A. 2008b. A Computational Framework for Institutional Agency. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 161, 25-52.
[25]
Hilpinen, R. 2001. Deontic Logic. In Goble, L. Ed., The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic pp. 159-182. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
[26]
Hofstadter, D. R. 1983. Metamagical Themas: Computer Tournaments of the Prisoner's Dilemma Suggest How Cooperation Evolves. Scientific American, 2485, 16-26.
[27]
Kagal, L., Berners-Lee, T., Connolly, D.,&Weitzner, D. 2006, July 16-20. Using Semantic Web Technologies for Open Policy Management on the Web. In Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence AAAI 2006. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
[28]
Kautz, H. A.,&Selman, B. 1991. Hard Problems for Simple Default Theories. Artificial Intelligence, 28, 243-279.
[29]
Kolaczek, G. 2002. Application of Deontic Logic in Role-based Access Control. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 122, 269-275.
[30]
Kontopoulos, E., Bassiliades, N., Governatori, G.,&Antoniou, G. 2008. Extending a Defeasible Reasoner with Modal and Deontic Logic Operators. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Logics for Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Systems WLIAMAS 2008, IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia pp. 626-629. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
[31]
Kontopoulos, E., Bassiliades, N., Governatori, G.,&Antoniou, G. 2011. Visualizing Semantic Web Proofs of Defeasible Logic in the DR-DEVICE System. Knowledge-Based Systems, 243, 406-419.
[32]
Kravari, K., Kontopoulos, E.,&Bassiliades, N. 2010a, May 4-7. EMERALD: A Multi-Agent System for Knowledge-based Reasoning Interoperability in the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of the 6th Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence SETN 2010, Athens, Greece pp. 173-182.
[33]
Kravari, K., Kontopoulos, E.,&Bassiliades, N. 2010b. Trusted Reasoning Services for Semantic Web Agents. Informatica: International Journal of Computing and Informatics, 344, 429-440.
[34]
Lam, H.,&Governatori, G. 2009. The Making of SPINdle. In G. Governatori, J. Hall,&A. Paschke Eds., Proceedings of the 2009 International Symposium on Rule Interchange and Applications LNCS 5858, pp. 315-322.
[35]
Lokhorst, G.-J. C. 1996. Reasoning about actions and obligations in first-order logic. Studia Logica, 571, 221-237.
[36]
Maher, M. J.,&Governatori, G. 1999. A Semantic Decomposition of Defeasible Logics. In Proceedings of the 16th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Orlando, FL pp. 299-305. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
[37]
Meyer, J.-J. C. 2001. Epistemic Logic. In Goble, L. Ed., The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
[38]
Meyer, J.-J. C. 2003. Modal Epistemic and Doxastic Logic. In Gabbay, D.,&Guenthner, F. Eds., Handbook of Philosophical Logic 2nd ed., Vol. 10, pp. 1-38. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
[39]
Nute, D. 1994. Defeasible logic. In Gabbay, D. Ed., Handbook of Logic and Artificial Intelligence Vol. 3, pp. 353-395. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[40]
Nute, D. 1998. Norms, Priorities, and Defeasible Logic. In McNamara, P.,&Prakken, H. Eds., Norms, Logics and Information Systems pp. 201-218. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
[41]
Pham, D. H., Governatori, G., Raboczi, S., Newman, A.,&Thakur, S. 2008. On Extending RuleML for Modal Defeasible Logic. In N. Bassiliades, G. Governatori,&A. Paschke Eds., Proceedings of the International Symposium on Rule Representation, Interchange and Reasoning on the Web RuleML 2008, Orlando, FL LNCS 5321, pp. 89-103.
[42]
Rissland, E. L.,&Skalak, D. B. 1991. CABARET: Rule Interpretation in a Hybrid Architecture. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 346, 839-887.
[43]
Riveret, R., Rotolo, A.,&Governatori, G. 2007. Interaction between Normative Systems and Cognitive Agents in Temporal Modal Defeasible Logic. In G. Boella, L. van der Torre,&H. Verhagen Eds., Proceedings of the Normative Multi-Agent Systems NorMAS Conference, Dagstuhl, Germany.
[44]
Schild, U. J.,&Herzog, S. 1993. The Use of Meta-rules in Rule Based Legal Computer Systems. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law ICAIL'93 pp. 100-109. New York, NY: ACM Press.
[45]
Skylogiannis, T., Antoniou, G., Bassiliades, N., Governatori, G.,&Bikakis, A. 2007. DR-NEGOTIATE - A System for Automated Agent Negotiation with Defeasible Logic-Based Strategies. Data&Knowledge Engineering, 632, 362-380.
[46]
Soininen, T.,&Niemela, I. 1998. Developing a Declarative Rule Language for Applications in Product Configuration. In G. Gupta Ed., Proceedings of International Symposium on Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages PADL pp. 305-319. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
[47]
Venema, Y. 2001. Temporal Logic. In Goble, L. Ed., The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic pp. 203-223. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Leverage a Trust Service Platform for Data Usage Control in Smart City2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)10.1109/GLOCOM.2016.7841951(1-7)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2016
  • (2014)Deontic Logic for Human ReasoningEssays Dedicated to Gerhard Brewka on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday on Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation - Volume 906010.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_5(63-80)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2014
  • (2014)Automated Reasoning in Deontic LogicProceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Multi-disciplinary Trends in Artificial Intelligence - Volume 887510.1007/978-3-319-13365-2_6(57-68)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2014
  • Show More Cited By
  1. A Modal Defeasible Reasoner of Deontic Logic for the Semantic Web

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image International Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems
    International Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems  Volume 7, Issue 1
    January 2011
    78 pages
    ISSN:1552-6283
    EISSN:1552-6291
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    IGI Global

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 January 2011

    Author Tags

    1. Agent Behaviour
    2. Defeasible Logic
    3. Deontic Logic
    4. Modal Logic
    5. Semantic Web

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2016)Leverage a Trust Service Platform for Data Usage Control in Smart City2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)10.1109/GLOCOM.2016.7841951(1-7)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2016
    • (2014)Deontic Logic for Human ReasoningEssays Dedicated to Gerhard Brewka on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday on Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation - Volume 906010.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_5(63-80)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2014
    • (2014)Automated Reasoning in Deontic LogicProceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Multi-disciplinary Trends in Artificial Intelligence - Volume 887510.1007/978-3-319-13365-2_6(57-68)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2014
    • (2013)Representing Judicial Argumentation in the Semantic WebRevised Selected Papers of the AICOL 2013 International Workshops on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems - Volume 892910.1007/978-3-662-45960-7_13(172-187)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2013
    • (2013)Computing temporal defeasible logicProceedings of the 7th international conference on Theory, Practice, and Applications of Rules on the Web10.1007/978-3-642-39617-5_13(114-128)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2013
    • (2012)Possible world semantics for defeasible deontic logicProceedings of the 11th international conference on Deontic Logic in Computer Science10.1007/978-3-642-31570-1_4(46-60)Online publication date: 16-Jul-2012

    View Options

    View options

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media