Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2013.252005acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespervasivehealthConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Identifying barriers in telesurgery by studying current team practices in robot-assisted surgery

Published: 05 May 2013 Publication History

Abstract

This paper investigates challenges in current practices in robot-assisted surgery. In addition, by using the method of proxy technology assessment, we provide insights into the current barriers to wider application of robot-assisted telesurgery, where the surgeon and console are physically remote from the patient and operating team. Research in this field has focused on the financial and technological constraints that limit such application; less has been done to clarify the complex dynamics of an operating team that traditionally works in close symbiosis. Results suggest that there are implications for working practices in transitioning from traditional robot-assisted surgery to remote robotic surgery that need to be addressed, such as possible communication problems which might have a negative impact on patient outcomes.

References

[1]
C. R. Doarn and G. R. Moses, "Overcoming Barriers to Wider Adoption of Mobile Robotic Surgery: Engineering, Clinical and Business Challenges.," in Surgical Robotics - Systems, Applications, and Visions., J. Rosen, B. Hannaford, and R. Satava, Eds. 2011, pp. 69--102.
[2]
D. M. Herron and M. Marohn, "A consensus document on robotic surgery," Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 313--325, 2008.
[3]
S. Bann, M. Khan, J. Hernandez, Y. Munz, K. Moorthy, V. Datta, T. Rockall, and A. Darzi, "Robotics in surgery.," Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 196, no. 5, pp. 784--95, May 2003.
[4]
J. Marescaux, J. Leroy, M. Gagner, F. Rubino, D. Mutter, M. Vix, S. E. Butner, and M. K. Smith, "Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery," Nature, vol. 413, no. 6854, pp. 379--380, 2001.
[5]
B. Challacombe, P. Dasgupta, U. Patel, P. Amoroso, and R. Kirby, "Recognizing and managing the complications of prostate biopsy," BJU international, vol. 108, no. 8, pp. 1233--1234, 2011.
[6]
T. Haidegger, J. Sándor, and Z. Benyó, "Surgery in space: the future of robotic telesurgery," Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 681--690, 2011.
[7]
V. da Silva, T. McGregor, R. Rayman, and P. P. W. Luke, "Telementoring and Telesurgery: Future or Fiction?," 2010.
[8]
R. M. Satava, "Future Directions in Robotic Surgery," in Surgical Robotics: Systems Applications and Visions, J. Rosen, B. Hannaford, and R. M. Satava, Eds. Springer, 2010, p. 1.
[9]
A. Blavier and A.-S. Nyssen, "{É}tude de l'impact des nouvelles technologies sur les modes de coop{é}ration des chirurgiens par l'analyse des communications sur le terrain," Le travail humain, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 123--140, 2010.
[10]
D. Nio, W. a Bemelman, O. R. C. Busch, B. C. Vrouenraets, and D. J. Gouma, "Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study.," Surgical endoscopy, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 379--82, Mar. 2004.
[11]
J. L. Webster and C. G. L. Cao, "Lowering Communication Barriers in Operating Room Technology," Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 747--758, Dec. 2006.
[12]
A.-S. Nyssen and A. Blavier, "Communication as a sign of adaptation to a complex system: The case of robotic surgery," in Improving Healthcare Team Communication: Building on Lessons from Aviation and Aerospace, C. Nemeth, Ed. 2008, pp. 1--18.
[13]
M. S. Ackerman, "The intellectual challenge of CSCW: The gap between social requirements and technical feasibility," Human-computer interaction, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 179--203, 2000.
[14]
R. Silverstone, L. Haddon, R. In Silverstone, and R. Mansell, "Design and the domestication of {ICTs:} technical change and everyday life," Communicating by Design: The Politics of Information and Communication Technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p44--74, 1996.
[15]
S. Arora, L. Hull, N. Sevdalis, T. Tierney, D. Nestel, M. Woloshynowych, A. Darzi, and R. Kneebone, "Factors compromising safety in surgery: stressful events in the operating room," The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 199, no. 1, pp. 60--65, 2010.
[16]
S. Saunders, "Why good communication skills are important for theatre nurses.," Nursing times, vol. 100, no. 14, pp. 42--44, 2004.
[17]
S. Undre, A. N. Healey, A. Darzi, and C. A. Vincent, "Observational assessment of surgical teamwork: a feasibility study," World journal of surgery, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1774--1783, 2006.
[18]
J. B. Sexton, M. A. Makary, A. R. Tersigni, D. Pryor, A. Hendrich, E. J. Thomas, C. G. Holzmueller, A. P. Knight, Y. Wu, and P. J. Pronovost, "Teamwork in the operating room: frontline perspectives among hospitals and operating room personnel," Anesthesiology, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 877--884, Nov. 2006.
[19]
J. Pierson, A. Jacobs, K. Dreessen, B. Lievens, I. den Broeck, and W. den Broeck, "Walking the interface: uncovering practices through proxy technology assessment," Paper for EPIC, pp. 24--26, 2006.
[20]
J. Forlizzi, "The product ecology: Understanding social product use and supporting design culture," Human-Computer Interaction Institute, p. 35, 2007.
[21]
S. Cunningham, A. Chellali, I. Jaffre, J. Classe, and C. G. L. Cao, "Effects of experience and workplace culture in Human-Robot Team Interaction in Robotic Surgery: A Case Study," International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 75--88, 2013.
[22]
B. Challacombe, R. Weston, G. Coughlin, D. Murphy, and P. Dasgupta, "Live surgical demonstrations in urology: valuable educational tool or putting patients at risk?," BJU International, vol. 106, no. 11, pp. 1571--1574, 2010.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Towards Surgical RobotsProceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction10.1145/3369457.3370916(255-265)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2019
  • (2019)Impacts of Telemanipulation in Robotic Assisted SurgeryProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300813(1-15)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
  • (2014)Exploring the social-technological gap in telesurgeryProceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing10.1145/2531602.2531717(1537-1548)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2014

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
PervasiveHealth '13: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
May 2013
483 pages
ISBN:9781936968800

Sponsors

  • IEEE
  • EAI: The European Alliance for Innovation

In-Cooperation

Publisher

ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering)

Brussels, Belgium

Publication History

Published: 05 May 2013

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. component
  2. da Vinci
  3. remote surgery
  4. robot-assisted surgery
  5. robotically-assisted surgery
  6. roles in the operating room
  7. surgical robot
  8. telesurgery
  9. workflow

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

PervasiveHealth '13
Sponsor:
  • EAI

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 55 of 116 submissions, 47%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Towards Surgical RobotsProceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction10.1145/3369457.3370916(255-265)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2019
  • (2019)Impacts of Telemanipulation in Robotic Assisted SurgeryProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300813(1-15)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
  • (2014)Exploring the social-technological gap in telesurgeryProceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing10.1145/2531602.2531717(1537-1548)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2014

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media