Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/1273694.1273699dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescrpitsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Termination of abstract reduction systems

Published: 30 January 2007 Publication History

Abstract

We present a general theorem capturing conditions required for the termination of abstract reduction systems. We show that our theorem generalises another similar general theorem about termination of such systems. We apply our theorem to give interesting proofs of termination for typed combinatory logic. Thus, our method can handle most path-orderings in the literature as well as the reducibility method typically used for typed combinators. Finally we show how our theorem can be used to prove termination for incrementally defined rewrite systems, including an incremental general path ordering. All proofs have been formally machine-checked in Isabelle/HOL.

References

[1]
Yohji Akama. A λ-to-CL Translation for Strong Normalization. In Proc. Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications (TLCA'97), LNCS 1210, 1--10, Springer, 1997.
[2]
Thomas Arts and Jürgen Giesl. Termination of Term Rewriting Using Dependency Pairs. Theoretical Computer Science 236 (2000), 133--178, 2000.
[3]
Franz Baader and Tobias Nipkow. Term Rewriting and All That. CUP, 1998
[4]
C Borralleras, M Ferreira and A Rubio. Complete Monotonic Semantic Path Orderings. In Proc. CADE-17, LNCS 1831, 346--364, Springer, 2000.
[5]
Wilfried Buchholz. Proof-theoretic analysis of termination proofs. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 75 (1995), 57--65.
[6]
Jeremy E Dawson and Rajeev Goré. A General Theorem on Termination of Rewriting. In Proc. Computer Science Logic (CSL 2004), LNCS 3210, 100--114, 2004.
[7]
J E Dawson and R Goré. Machine-checked Termination Proofs for Abstract Reduction Systems. In preparation.
[8]
J E Dawson. Isabelle/HOL code, http://web.rsise.anu.edu.au/~jeremy/isabelle
[9]
N Dershowitz. Termination Dependencies (Extended Abstract). In Proc. Sixth Int'l Workshop on Termination (WST '03), A Rubio, ed., Valencia, Spain, pp. 27--30.
[10]
N Dershowitz & C Hoot. Natural Termination. TCS 142 (1995), 179--207.
[11]
Henk Doornbos & Burghard Von Karger. On the Union of Well-Founded Relations. L. J. of the IGPL 6 (1998), 195--201.
[12]
Mirtha-Lina Fernández, Guillem Godoy, Albert Rubio. Recursive Path Orderings Can Also Be Incremental. Proc. LPAR2005, LNCS 3835, 230--245, Springer, 2005.
[13]
Jean-Yves Girard, Yves Lafont and Paul Taylor. Proofs and Types. CUP, 1990.
[14]
J Goubault-Larrecq. Well-founded recursive relations. In Proc. CSL'2001, LNCS 2142, 484--497, Springer, 2001.
[15]
Nao Hirokawa and Aart Middeldorp. Dependency Pairs Revisited. In Proc. Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA-04), LNCS 3091, 249--268, Springer, 2004.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
CATS '07: Proceedings of the thirteenth Australasian symposium on Theory of computing - Volume 65
January 2007
153 pages
ISBN:1920682465

Publisher

Australian Computer Society, Inc.

Australia

Publication History

Published: 30 January 2007

Author Tags

  1. rewriting
  2. strong normalisation
  3. termination
  4. well-founded ordering

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

CATS '07
CATS '07: Theory of computing
January 30 - February 2, 2007
Victoria, Ballarat, Australia

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 118 of 228 submissions, 52%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 130
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)46
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media