research-article

Zero-intelligence agents in prediction markets

Author:

Abraham OthmanAuthors Info & Claims

AAMAS '08: Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 2

Pages 879 - 886

Published: 12 May 2008 Publication History

Abstract

We construct a novel agent-based model of prediction markets in which putative human qualities like learning, reasoning, and profit-seeking are absent. We show that the prices which emerge from a market populated by a class of distinctly inhuman agents, Zero-Intelligence agents with diffuse beliefs, replicate the findings of empirical market studies. We use this result to argue against the prevailing descriptive theories of price formation in prediction markets, which have stressed the role of expert, rational participants.

References

[1]

M. Ali. Probability and Utility Estimates for Racetrack Bettors. The Journal of Political Economy, 85(4):803--815, 1977.

[2]

A. Bagnall and I. Toft. Zero Intelligence Plus and Gjerstad-Dickhaut Agents for Sealed Bid Auctions. Workshop on Trading Agent Design and Analysis, part of international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS-2004), pages 59--64, 2004.

[3]

J. Berg and T. Rietz. The Iowa Electronic Markets: Stylized Facts and Open Issues. Information Markets: A New Way of Making Decisions, edited by Robert W. Hahn and Paul C. Tetlock. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, 2006.

[4]

D. Cliff and J. Bruten. Zero is not enough: On the lower limit of agent intelligence for continuous double auction markets. Technical Report HPL-97-141, Hewlett-Packard Laboratories Bristol, 1997.

[5]

R. Das, J. Hanson, J. Kephart, and G. Tesauro. Agent-human interactions in the continuous double auction. Proceedings of the International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-2001), pages 4--10, 2001.

Digital Library

[6]

R. Forsythe, F. Nelson, G. Neumann, and J. Wright. Anatomy of an Experimental Political Stock Market. The American Economic Review, 82(5):1142--1161, 1992.

[7]

R. Forsythe, T. Rietz, and T. Ross. Wishes, expectations and actions: a survey on price formation in election stock markets. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 39(1):83--110, 1999.

[8]

S. Gjerstad. Risk Aversion, Beliefs, and Prediction Market Equilibrium. Technical report, Economic Science Laboratory, University of Arizona, 2005.

[9]

S. Gjerstad and J. M. Shachat. Individual rationality and market efficiency. Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1204, Purdue University, Department of Economics, Aug. 2007.

[10]

D. Gode and S. Sunder. Allocative Efficiency of Markets with Zero-Intelligence Traders: Market as a Partial Substitute for Individual Rationality. Journal of Political Economy, 101(1):119--37, 1993.

[11]

C. F. Manski. Interpreting the predictions of prediction markets. NBER Working Papers 10359, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, Mar. 2004.

[12]

D. M. Pennock and R. Sami. Computational Aspects of Prediction Markets. In Algorithmic Game Theory, chapter 26, pages 651--674. Cambridge University Press, 2007.

[13]

R. Serrano-Padial. Strategic Foundations of Prediction Markets and the Efficient Markets Hypothesis. Second workshop on prediction markets, part of ACM conference on Electronic commerce (EC2007), 2007.

Digital Library

[14]

V. Smith. Markets as Economizers of Information: Experimental Examination of the "Hayek Hypothesis". Economic Inquiry, 20(2):165--79, 1982.

[15]

K. Steiglitz and L. O'Callighan. Microsimulation of markets and endogenous price bubbles. Third International Conference on Computing in Economics and Finance, 1997.

[16]

V. Walia, A. Byde, and D. Cliff. Evolving market design in zero-intelligence trader markets. IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce (CEC 2003), pages 157--164, 2003.

[17]

J. Wolfers and E. Zitzewitz. Five open questions about prediction markets. NBER Working Papers 12060, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, Feb. 2006.

[18]

J. Wolfers and E. Zitzewitz. Interpreting prediction market prices as probabilities. NBER Working Papers 12200, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, May 2006.

Cited By

Wright MWellman MAndre EKoenig SDastani MSukthankar G(2018)Evaluating the Stability of Non-Adaptive Trading in Continuous Double AuctionsProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems10.5555/3237383.3237475(614-622)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3237383.3237475
Li ZDas SJonker CMarsella SThangarajah JTuyls K(2016)An Agent-Based Model of Competition Between Financial ExchangesProceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems10.5555/2936924.2936937(50-58)Online publication date: 9-May-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2936924.2936937
Jumadinova JDasgupta P(2015)Automated Pricing in a Multiagent Prediction Market Using a Partially Observable Stochastic GameACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/27004886:4(1-25)Online publication date: 29-Jul-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2700488
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Zero-intelligence agents in prediction markets
1. Applied computing
  1. Law, social and behavioral sciences

Recommendations

Arbitrage Opportunities and Market-Making Traders in Prediction Markets
CECANDEEE '08: Proceedings of the 2008 10th IEEE Conference on E-Commerce Technology and the Fifth IEEE Conference on Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce and E-Services

Prediction markets are a promising approach for predicting uncertain future events and developments. These markets will work well if they are efficient and in efficient markets, one does not expect arbitrage opportunities to be persistent. This paper ...
Corporate prediction markets: evidence from google, ford, and firm X
EC '14: Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation

Despite the popularity of prediction markets among economists, businesses and policymakers have been slow to adopt them in decision making. Most studies of prediction markets outside the lab are from public markets with large trading populations. ...
Aggregation and Manipulation in Prediction Markets: Effects of Trading Mechanism and Information Distribution

We conduct laboratory experiments on variants of market scoring rule prediction markets, under different information distribution patterns, to evaluate the efficiency and speed of information aggregation, as well as test recent theoretical results on ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

AAMAS '08: Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 2

May 2008

673 pages

ISBN:9780981738116

Sponsors

ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
AAAI: Association for the Advancement of Artifical Intelligence

In-Cooperation

SIGAI: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence

Publisher

International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

Richland, SC

Publication History

Published: 12 May 2008

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

AAMAS08

Sponsor:

ACM
AAAI

AAMAS08: 7th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems

May 12 - 16, 2008

Estoril, Portugal

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

9
Total Citations
View Citations
427
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)1
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Wright MWellman MAndre EKoenig SDastani MSukthankar G(2018)Evaluating the Stability of Non-Adaptive Trading in Continuous Double AuctionsProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems10.5555/3237383.3237475(614-622)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3237383.3237475
Li ZDas SJonker CMarsella SThangarajah JTuyls K(2016)An Agent-Based Model of Competition Between Financial ExchangesProceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems10.5555/2936924.2936937(50-58)Online publication date: 9-May-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2936924.2936937
Jumadinova JDasgupta P(2015)Automated Pricing in a Multiagent Prediction Market Using a Partially Observable Stochastic GameACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/27004886:4(1-25)Online publication date: 29-Jul-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2700488
Chie BChen S(2014)Toward a spatial agent-based prediction marketProceedings of the 2014 Symposium on Agent Directed Simulation10.5555/2665049.2665057(1-6)Online publication date: 13-Apr-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2665049.2665057
Atanasov PRescober PStone EServan-Schreiber EMellers BTetlock PUngar L(2013)The marketcast method for aggregating prediction market forecastsProceedings of the 6th international conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction10.1007/978-3-642-37210-0_4(28-37)Online publication date: 2-Apr-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-642-37210-0_4
Othman ASandholm T(2012)Rational market making with probabilistic knowledgeProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 210.5555/2343776.2343789(645-652)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2343776.2343789
Yu TChen S(2011)Agent-Based modeling of the prediction markets for political electionsProceedings of the 12th international conference on Multi-Agent-Based Simulation10.1007/978-3-642-28400-7_3(31-43)Online publication date: 2-May-2011
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-642-28400-7_3
Othman ASandholm TLuck MSen S(2010)When do markets with simple agents fail?Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: volume 1 - Volume 110.5555/1838206.1838322(865-872)Online publication date: 10-May-2010
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1838206.1838322
Othman ASandholm TParkes DDellarocas CTennenholtz M(2010)Automated market-making in the largeProceedings of the 11th ACM conference on Electronic commerce10.1145/1807342.1807401(367-376)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2010
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1807342.1807401

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents