Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/1558013.1558064guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free access

Facing the challenge of human-agent negotiations via effective general opponent modeling

Published: 10 May 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Automated negotiation agents capable of negotiating efficiently with people must deal with the fact that people are diverse in their behavior and each individual might negotiate in a different manner. Thus, automated agents must rely on a good opponent modeling component to model their counterpart and adapt their behavior to their partner. In this paper we present the KBAgent. The KBAgent is an automated negotiator that negotiates with each person only once, and uses past negotiation sessions of others as a knowledge base for general opponent modeling. The database is used to extract the likelihood of acceptance and proposals that may be offered by the opposite side. Experiments conducted with people show that the KBAgent negotiates efficiently with people and even achieves better utility values than another automated negotiator, shown to be efficient in negotiations with people. Moreover, the KBAgent achieves significantly better agreements, in terms of individual utility, than the human counterparts playing the same role.

References

[1]
]]M. H. Bazerman and M. A. Neale. Negotiator rationality and negotiator cognition: The interactive roles of prescriptive and descriptive research. In H. P. Young, editor, Negotiation Analysis, pages 109--130. The University of Michigan Press, 1992.
[2]
]]S. R. Brown and L. E. Melamed. Experimental Design and Analysis. Sage Publications, Inc., CA, USA, 1990.
[3]
]]A. Byde, M. Yearworth, K.-Y. Chen, and C. Bartolini. AutONA: A system for automated multiple 1-1 negotiation. In Proceedings of CEC'03, pages 59--67, 2003.
[4]
]]R. M. Coehoorn and N. R. Jennings. Learning on opponent's preferences to make effective multi-issue negotiation trade-offs. In Proceedings of ICEC'04, pages 59--68, 2004.
[5]
]]R. Cohen. Negotiating Across Cultures: Communication Obstacles in International Diplomacy. United States Institute of Peace Press, Washington, D.C., 1991.
[6]
]]I. Erev and A. Roth. Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibrium. American Economic Review, 88(4):848--881, 1998.
[7]
]]Y. Gal, A. Pfeffer, F. Marzo, and B. J. Grosz. Learning social preferences in games. In Proceedings of AAAI-04, pages 226--231, 2004.
[8]
]]K. Hindriks and D. Tykhonov. Opponent modelling in automated multi-issue negotiation using bayesian learning. In Proceedings of AAMAS'08, pages 331--338, 2008.
[9]
]]R. Katz, Y. Amichai-Hamburger, E. Manisterski, and S. Kraus. Different orientations of males and females in computer-mediated negotiation. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2):516--534, 2008.
[10]
]]D. A. Lax and J. K. Sebenius. Thinking coalitionally: party arithmetic, process opportunism, and strategic sequencing. In H. P. Young, editor, Negotiation Analysis, pages 153--193. The University of Michigan Press, 1992.
[11]
]]M. LeBaron and V. Pillay. Conflict Across Cultures: A Unique Experience of Bridging Differences. Nicholas Brealey Publishing, Boston, MA, 2006.
[12]
]]T. Leonard and J. S. J. Hsu. Bayesian Methods - An Analysis for Statisticians and interdisciplinary Researchers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999.
[13]
]]R. Lin, S. Kraus, J. Wilkenfeld, and J. Barry. Negotiating with bounded rational agents in environments with incomplete information using an automated agent. AIJ, 172(6--7):823--851, 2008.
[14]
]]R. D. Luce. Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, NY, 1959.
[15]
]]R. D. McKelvey and T. R. Palfrey. An experimental study of the centipede game. Econometrica, 60(4):803--836, 1992.
[16]
]]J. F. Nash. The bargaining problem. Econ., 18:155--1622, 1950.
[17]
]]M. J. Osborne and A. Rubinstein. A Course In Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1994.
[18]
]]P. Pasquier, R. Hollands, F. Dignum, I. Rahwan, and L. Sonenberg. An empirical study of interest-based negotiation. In Proceedings of ICEC'07, pages 339--348, 2007.
[19]
]]S. Saha, A. Biswas, and S. Sen. Modeling opponent decision in repeated one-shot negotiations. In Proceedings of AAMAS'05, pages 397--403, 2005.
[20]
]]S. Saha and S. Sen. Negotiating efficient outcomes over multiple issues. In Proceedings of AAMAS'06, pages 423--425, 2006.
[21]
]]S. Siegel. Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, NY, USA, 1956.
[22]
]]D. Traum, S. Marsella, J. Gratch, J. Lee, and A. Hartholt. Multi-party, multi-issue, multi-strategy negotiation for multi-modal virtual agents. In Proceedings of IVA'08, 2008.
[23]
]]M. Wand and M. Jones. Kernel Smoothing. Chapman & Hall, London, 1995.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Comparing The Accuracy of Frequentist and Bayesian Models in Human-Agent NegotiationProceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1145/3472306.3478354(139-144)Online publication date: 14-Sep-2021
  • (2020)Towards Understanding the Effect of Voice on Human-Agent NegotiationProceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1145/3383652.3423896(1-8)Online publication date: 20-Oct-2020
  • (2017)How to form winning coalitions in mixed human-computer settingsProceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3171642.3171709(465-471)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2017
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Facing the challenge of human-agent negotiations via effective general opponent modeling

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Guide Proceedings
    AAMAS '09: Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1
    May 2009
    701 pages
    ISBN:9780981738161

    Sponsors

    • Drexel University
    • Wiley-Blackwell
    • Microsoft Research: Microsoft Research
    • Whitestein Technologies
    • European Office of Aerospace Research and Development, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, United States Air Force Research Laboratory
    • The Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents

    Publisher

    International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

    Richland, SC

    Publication History

    Published: 10 May 2009

    Author Tags

    1. automated bilateral negotiation
    2. opponent modeling

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    AAMAS '09 Paper Acceptance Rate 132 of 651 submissions, 20%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)52
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13
    Reflects downloads up to 17 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Comparing The Accuracy of Frequentist and Bayesian Models in Human-Agent NegotiationProceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1145/3472306.3478354(139-144)Online publication date: 14-Sep-2021
    • (2020)Towards Understanding the Effect of Voice on Human-Agent NegotiationProceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1145/3383652.3423896(1-8)Online publication date: 20-Oct-2020
    • (2017)How to form winning coalitions in mixed human-computer settingsProceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3171642.3171709(465-471)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2017
    • (2016)Learning about the opponent in automated bilateral negotiationAutonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems10.1007/s10458-015-9309-130:5(849-898)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016
    • (2016)Algorithm selection in bilateral negotiationAutonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems10.1007/s10458-015-9302-830:4(697-723)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016
    • (2014)NegoChatProceedings of the 2014 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems10.5555/2615731.2615817(525-532)Online publication date: 5-May-2014
    • (2014)Adaptive resource allocation for wildlife protection against illegal poachersProceedings of the 2014 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems10.5555/2615731.2615805(453-460)Online publication date: 5-May-2014
    • (2014)Strategic Information Disclosure to People with Multiple AlternativesACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/25583975:4(1-21)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2014
    • (2014)An experimental study of software agent negotiations with humansDecision Support Systems10.1016/j.dss.2014.06.00966:C(135-145)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2014
    • (2012)A cultural sensitive agent for human-computer negotiationProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 110.5555/2343576.2343641(451-458)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2012
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media