No abstract available.
Cited By
- Glass R and Land F (2019). Errors in Computing History, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 43:4, (7-8), Online publication date: 28-Dec-2018.
- Ali A, Warren D and Mathiassen L (2017). Cloud-based business services innovation, International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals, 37:6, (639-649), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017.
- Halstead S, Ortiz R, Córdova M and Seguí M The impact of lack in domain or technology experience on the accuracy of expert effort estimates in software projects Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, (248-259)
- Basu V and Lederer A (2011). Agency theory and consultant management in enterprise resource planning systems implementation, ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 42:3, (10-33), Online publication date: 27-Sep-2011.
- Jeet K, Bhatia N and Minhas R (2011). A model for estimating the impact of low productivity on the schedule of a software development project, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 36:4, (1-6), Online publication date: 4-Aug-2011.
- Fernández-Sanz L and Misra S Influence of human factors in software quality and productivity Proceedings of the 2011 international conference on Computational science and Its applications - Volume Part V, (257-269)
- Rost J and Glass R (2009). The impact of subversive stakeholders on software projects, Communications of the ACM, 52:7, (135-138), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2009.
- Kino Y, Tsuda K and Tsukahara T Extraction of the Project Risk Knowledge on the Basis of a Project Plan Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, Part II, (1018-1025)
- Costa H, Barros M and Travassos G (2007). Evaluating software project portfolio risks, Journal of Systems and Software, 80:1, (16-31), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2007.
- Börjesson A Simple indicators for tracking software process improvement progress Proceedings of the 13th European conference on Software Process Improvement, (74-87)
- Verner J, Cox K and Bleistein S Predicting good requirements for in-house development projects Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering, (154-163)
- Stiller E and LeBlanc C (2006). Teaching software development by example, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21:6, (228-237), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2006.
- Maranzano J, Rozsypal S, Zimmerman G, Warnken G, Wirth P and Weiss D (2005). Architecture Reviews, IEEE Software, 22:2, (34-43), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2005.
- Kussmaul C (2005). Using agile development methods to improve student writing, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 20:3, (148-156), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2005.
- Wallace L, Keil M and Rai A (2004). Understanding software project risk, Information and Management, 42:1, (115-125), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2004.
- Basu V and Lederer A An agency theory model of ERP implementation Proceedings of the 2004 SIGMIS conference on Computer personnel research: Careers, culture, and ethics in a networked environment, (8-13)
- Shoemaker D, Jovanovic V and Drommi A A case for the study of software management within a broad information technology curriculum Proceedings of the 4th conference on Information technology curriculum, (174-179)
- Dalcher D and Drevin L Learning from information systems failures by using narrative and ante-narrative methods Proceedings of the 2003 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on Enablement through technology, (137-142)
- Kajko-Mattsson M Towards A Business Maintenance Model Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM'01)
- Glassbrook A Evaluating the Predelivery Phase of ISO/IEC FDIS 14764 in the Swedish Context Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM'01)
- Kajko-Mattsson M, Forssander S and Olsson U Corrective maintenance maturity model (CM3) Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, (610-619)
- El Emam K and Birk A (2000). Validating the ISO/IEC 15504 Measure of Software Requirements Analysis Process Capability, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26:6, (541-566), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2000.
- O'Callaghan A (2018). Focus issue on legacy infomation systems and business process engineering, Communications of the AIS, 2:1es, (3-es), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1999.
- Keil M, Cule P, Lyytinen K and Schmidt R (1998). A framework for identifying software project risks, Communications of the ACM, 41:11, (76-83), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1998.
- Glass R (1998). Controlling software diseases, ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 29:3, (13-15), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1998.
- Charette R, Adams K and White M (2018). Managing Risk in Software Maintenance, IEEE Software, 14:3, (43-50), Online publication date: 1-May-1997.
- Blackburn J, Scudder G and Van Wassenhove L (1996). Improving Speed and Productivity of Software Development, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 22:12, (875-885), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1996.
- Wasserman A (2018). Toward a Discipline of Software Engineering, IEEE Software, 13:6, (23-31), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1996.
- Maxwell K, Van Wassenhove L and Dutta S (1996). Software Development Productivity of European Space, Military, and Industrial Applications, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 22:10, (706-718), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1996.
- Shoemaker D and Jovanovic V (1996). Educating software executives, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 21:2, (45-46), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1996.
- Brady S and DeMarco T (2018). Management-Aided Software Engineering, IEEE Software, 11:6, (25-32), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1994.
- Jones C (2018). Globalization of Software Supply and Demand, IEEE Software, 11:6, (17-24), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1994.
Index Terms
- Assessment and control of software risks
Recommendations
A hybrid approach for quantitative assessment of construction projects risks: The case study of poor quality concrete
Highlights- A new fuzzy-based approach is presented for quantitative assessment of project risks.
AbstractThis research presents a new fuzzy-based approach for quantitative assessment of construction projects risks. Using the proposed approach, the risk is decomposed into internal and external root causes prompting it and the probability ...
Software Risk Assessment and Estimation Model
ICCSIT '08: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Information TechnologyJust like any development projects, there is inherent risk in software development projects. Most of the software's fails due to over budget, delay in the delivery of the software’s and so on. In this paper we have proposed a software risk assessment ...
Insuring computer risks
Individuals and organizations who own or use computers in daily operations face many exposures to the risk of loss of hardware, software, and other computing assets, including liability arising from computing operations. Many loss prevention techniques ...