Activity-theoretical research on science teachers' expertise and learning
Pages 651 - 658
Abstract
Teachers serve as critical mediators of student learning. As such, teachers' expertise and learning remain important foci for theoretical development and empirical research. Cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT) has been forwarded as an underutilized but potentially powerful tool for educational research, including teachers' expertise, practice, and learning. However, as yet, little CHAT-based research has been undertaken focused on science teachers and teaching. In this paper, we draw upon two such empirical studies in which CHAT was used as an explicit theoretical and analytical framework to explore CHAT-based perspectives on science teacher learning. We present findings from these studies to highlight important themes in CHAT-based research on science teachers' learning in and from practice. These findings can not only inform programmatic efforts to better promote teachers' learning, but also theoretical perspectives on science teachers' expertise, practice, and learning across the science education and learning sciences communities.
References
[1]
Ball, D. L. & Lampert, M. (1999). Multiples of evidence, time, and perspective: Revisiting the study of teaching and learning. In E. C. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in education research: Problems and possibilities (pp. 371--398). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[2]
Barab, S. A. & Roth, W-M. (2006). Curriculum-based ecosystems: Supporting knowing from an ecological perspective. Educational Researcher, 35(5), 3--13.
[3]
Brown, M. (2009). Toward a theory of curriculum design and use: Understanding the teacher-tool relationship. In J. Remillard, B. Herbel-Eisenman, and G. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17--37). New York: Routledge.
[4]
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
[5]
Engeström, Y. (2007). Enriching the theory of expansive learning: Lessons from journeys toward coconfiguration. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(1--2), 23--39.
[6]
Engeström, Y. (2008). From design experiments to formative interventions. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pg. 3--24). Utrecht, the Netherlands: ISLS.
[7]
Forbes, C. T. & Davis, E. A. (2008). The development of preservice elementary teachers' curricular role identity for science teaching. Science Education, 92(5), 909--940.
[8]
Grossman, P., Smagorinsky, P., & Valencia, S. (1999). Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to teach. American Journal of Education, 108(1), 1--29.
[9]
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131--152.
[10]
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[11]
Lienhardt, G. & Greeno, J. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 75--95.
[12]
Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273--290.
[13]
Loughran, J., Milroy, P., Berry, A., Gunstone, R., Mulhall, P. (2001). Documenting science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge through PaP-eRs. Research in Science Education, 31, 289--307.
[14]
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95--132). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[15]
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
[16]
Morine-Dershimer, G. & Kent, T. (1999). The complex nature and sources of teachers' pedagogical knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 215--234). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
[17]
Putnam, R. T. & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4--15.
[18]
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211--246.
[19]
Roehrig, G. H., Kruse, R. A., & Kern, A. (2007). Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 883--907.
[20]
Roth, W-M & Lee, Y-J. (2007). "Vygotsky's neglected legacy": Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186--232.
[21]
Schwarz, C., Gunckel, K., Smith, E., Covitt, B., Enfield, M., Bae, M., & Tsurusaki, B. (2008). Helping elementary pre-service teachers learn to use science curriculum materials for effective science teaching. Science Education, 92(2), 345--377.
[22]
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4--14.
[23]
Slotta, J. D. (2004). The Web-based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE): Scaffolding knowledge integration in the science classroom. In M. C. Linn, P. Bell, and E. A. Davis (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 203--232). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[24]
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. London, England: Cambridge University Press.
[25]
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Recommendations
Teachers Acquisition of CALL Expertise
Research indicates that teachers need preparation in classroom based technology use, but teacher education programs do not prepare them. Nevertheless some teachers are effective with technology in language classrooms. In this paper, the author examines ...
Probing some theoretical aspects of practitioner-based inquiry research in information systems
SAICSIT '10: Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information TechnologistsInformation and Communication Technologies (ICT) practitioners are often located in the social sciences branch of Information Systems (IS). Practitioner research comprises of research that practitioners undertake with a view to the advancement of their ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2010
1190 pages
- Conference Chairs:
- Susan Goldman,
- James Pellegrino,
- Editors:
- Kimberly Gomez,
- Leilah Lyons,
- Joshua Radinsky
Publisher
International Society of the Learning Sciences
Publication History
Published: 29 June 2010
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 307 of 307 submissions, 100%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 105Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)1
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in