A taxonomy of functional units for information use of scholarly journal articles
Article No.: 31, Pages 1 - 10
Abstract
Today's readers of scholarly literature want to read more in less time. With this in mind, this study applies the idea of the functional unit to the use of digital documents. A functional unit is the smallest information unit with a distinct function within the Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion components of scholarly journal articles. Through a review and analysis of the literature and validation through user surveys, this study identifies a set of common functional units and examines how they are related to different tasks requiring use of information in journal articles and how they are related to each other for a particular information use task. The findings, presented in the form of a taxonomy, suggest a close relationship between functional units and information use tasks, and furthermore among a set of functional units for a particular information use task. This taxonomy can be used in the design of an electronic journal reading system to support effective and efficient information use.
References
[1]
Bishop, A. P. (1998). Digital libraries and knowledge disaggregation: The use of journal article components. In Digital Libraries 98: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 29--39).
[2]
Bishop, A. P. (1999). Document structure and digital libraries: How researchers mobilize information in journal articles. Information Processing and Management, 35 (5), 255--279.
[3]
Bishop, A. P., et al. (2000). Digital libraries: Situating use in changing information infrastructure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (4), 394--413.
[4]
Brett, P. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13 (1), 47--59.
[5]
Breure, L. (2001). Development of the genre concept. Retrieved August 28, 2007 from http://people.cs.uu.nl/leen/GenreDev/GenreDevelopment.htm
[6]
Dillon, A. (2000). Spatial-semantics: How users derive shape from information space. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(6), 521--528.
[7]
Dillon, A. (2004). Designing usable electronic text. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
[8]
Dillon, A., & Schaap, D. (1996). Expertise and the perception of shape in information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(10), 786--788.
[9]
Dubois, B. L. (1997). The biomedical discussion section in context. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
[10]
Harter, S. P. (1992). Psychological relevance and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43 (9), 602--615.
[11]
Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16 (4), 321--337.
[12]
Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7 (2), 113--121.
[13]
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24 (5), 269--292.
[14]
King, D. W., & Tenopir, C. (1999). Using and reading scholarly literature. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 423--477.
[15]
Lewin, B. A., Fine, J., & Young, L. (2001). Expository discourse: A genre-based approach to social science research texts. London: Continuum.
[16]
Nwogu, K. N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16 (2), 119--138.
[17]
Sandusky, R. J., & Tenopir, C. (2008). Finding and using journal-article components: Impacts of disaggregation on teaching and research practice. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (6), 970--982.
[18]
Saracevic, T. (2007). Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: Nature and manifestations of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (13), 1915--1933.
[19]
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
[20]
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[21]
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[22]
Taylor, R. S. (1991). Information use environments. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in Communication Sciences. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 10, 217--255.
[23]
Tenopir, C. (2003). Use and users of electronic library resources: An overview and analysis of recent research studies. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
[24]
Tenopir, C., et al. (2009a). Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 61(1), 5--32.
[25]
Tenopir, C., et al. (2009b). Variations in article seeking and reading patterns of academics: What makes a difference? Library & Information Science Research, 31(3), 139--148.
[26]
Thompson, D. K. (1993). Arguing for experimental---facts" in science: A study of research article results sections in biochemistry. Written communication, 10 (1), 106--128.
[27]
Unger, C. (2002). Cognitive-pragmatic explanations of socio-pragmatic phenomena: The case of genre. EPICS I Symposium.
[28]
Unger, C. (2006). Genre, relevance, and global coherence: The pragmatics of discourse type. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
[29]
Vaughan, M. W., & Dillon, A. (1998). The role of genre in shaping our understanding of digital documents. Proceedings of 61st Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 559--566.
[30]
White, H. D. (2007). Combining bibliometrics, information retrieval, and relevance theory. Part I: First examples of a synthesis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (4), 536--559.
[31]
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607--632). Oxford: Blackwell.
[32]
Wilson, T. D. (1994). Information needs and uses: Fifty years of progress? In B. C. Vickery (Ed.), Fifty years of information progress: A journal of documentation review (pp. 15--51). London: Aslib.
[33]
Yus, F. (2007). Weblogs: Web pages in search of a genre? In S. Posteguillo, M. J. Esteve & M. L. Gea-Valor (Eds.), The texture of Internet: Netlinguistics in progress (pp. 118--142). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Index Terms
- A taxonomy of functional units for information use of scholarly journal articles
Recommendations
Making functional units functional: The role of rhetorical structure in use of scholarly journal articles
Scholars are reading more journal articles than ever, so it is important that they focus on the relevant text within the articles they read. To support this goal, this study explores enhancements to a journal reading system by applying the idea of the ...
Grasping the structure of journal articles: Utilizing the functions of information units
Few studies have been done concerning document components and their effects on information use. This research empirically tested a taxonomy of functional units in a prototype journal system. This taxonomy was developed by identifying functions of the ...
Energy-efficient specialization of functional units in a coarse-grained reconfigurable array
FPGA '11: Proceedings of the 19th ACM/SIGDA international symposium on Field programmable gate arraysFunctional units provide the backbone of any spatial accelerator by providing the computing resources. The desire for having rich and expensive functional units is in tension with producing a regular and energy-efficient computing fabric. This paper ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Publisher
American Society for Information Science
United States
Publication History
Published: 22 October 2010
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Conference
ASIS&T '10
ASIS&T '10: Navigating Streams in an Information Ecosystem
October 22 - 27, 2010
Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh
Acceptance Rates
ASIS&T '10 Paper Acceptance Rate 52 of 149 submissions, 35%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 135 of 277 submissions, 49%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 85Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 10 Aug 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in