Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/1995456.1995781acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evolutionary optimization of the multiobjective transshipment problem with limited storage capacity

Published: 13 December 2009 Publication History

Abstract

In situations where some sellers have surplus stock while others, belonging to the same firm, are stocked out, it may be desirable to share the unsold units to fulfill more unmet demands and avoid holding costs. Such practice is named Transshipment. It ensures cost reduction and service level improvement. In this paper, we present a multiobjective study of a multi-location transshipment inventory which optimizes three objectives: (1) the aggregate cost, (2) the fill rate, and (3) the shared inventory quantity (SIQ), in the presence of different storage capacity constraints. Simulation is needed to evaluate the expected value of the problem stochastic objective functions. Two reference evolutionary multiobjective algorithms (SPEA2 and NSGA-II) are used to solve instances of the problem. Based on the obtained Pareto fronts, it is shown that both low aggregate cost and high fill rate levels could be ensured, while the shared inventory quantity is considerably increased.

References

[1]
Aggarwal, S. P. 1967. Inventory control aspect in warehouses. Symposium on Operations Research, Indian National Science Academy, New Delhi.
[2]
Sharma, D. A. Kumar, K. Deb, and K. Sindhya. 2007. Hybridization of SBX based NSGA-II and sequential quadratic programming for solving multiobjective optimization problems. Special Session & Competition on Performance Assessment of Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms, CEC-07. Singapore: 25--28.
[3]
Zitzler, E. and L. Thiele. 1999. Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: A Comparative Case Study and the Strength Pareto Approach. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 3, no. 4: 257--271.
[4]
Zitzler, E., M. Laumanns, and L. Thiele. 2002. SPEA2: Improving the strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimization. Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimisation, and Control. Barcelona, Spain: 19--26.
[5]
Herer, Y. T, Tzur, M., and Yucesan 2005. The multi-location transshipment problem. IIE Transactions.
[6]
Beyer, H.-G. 2000. Evolutionary algorithms in noisy environments: Theoretical issues and guidelines for practice. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics Engineering, 186(2--4): 239267.
[7]
Jonsson, H. and EA. Silver. 1987. Analysis of a Two-Echelon Inventory Control System with Complete Redistribution. Management Science 33: 215--227.
[8]
Krishnan, K. S. and Rao, V. R. K. 1965. Inventory control in N warehouses. J. Industrial. Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 3: 212--215.
[9]
Deb, K., A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, T. Meyarivan. 2002. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6: 182--197.
[10]
Raghuwanshi, M. M. and O. G. Kakde. 2004. Survey on multiobjective evolutionary and real coded genetic algorithms. In Proceeding of the 8th Asia Pacific Symposium on Intelligent and Evolutionary Systems, vol. 11: 150--161.
[11]
Tagaras, G., 1989. Effects of pooling on the optimization and service levels of two-location inventory systems. IIE Trans., Vol. 21, No. 3:250--257.
[12]
Xu, Kefeng and Evers, Philip T. & Fu, Michael C. 2003. Estimating customer service in a two-location continuous review inventory model with emergency transshipments. European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(3): 569--584.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WSC '09: Winter Simulation Conference
December 2009
3211 pages
ISBN:9781424457717

Sponsors

Publisher

Winter Simulation Conference

Publication History

Published: 13 December 2009

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

WSC09
Sponsor:
WSC09: Winter Simulation Conference
December 13 - 16, 2009
Texas, Austin

Acceptance Rates

WSC '09 Paper Acceptance Rate 137 of 256 submissions, 54%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 3,413 of 5,075 submissions, 67%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 51
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media