Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/2002669.2002698dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiwcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free access

Towards semi-automatic methods for improving WordNet

Published: 12 January 2011 Publication History

Abstract

WordNet is extensively used as a major lexical resource in NLP. However, its quality is far from perfect, and this alters the results of applications using it. We propose here to complement previous efforts for "cleaning up" the top-level of its taxonomy with semi-automatic methods based on the detection of errors at the lower levels. The methods we propose test the coherence of two sources of knowledge, exploiting ontological principles and semantic constraints.

References

[1]
Alvez, J., J. Atserias, J. Carrera, S. Climent, E. Laparra, A. Oliver, and G. Rigau (2008). Complete and consistent annotation of WordNet using the Top Concept Ontology. In Proceedings of LREC2008, pp. 1529--1534.
[2]
Bentivogli, L., I. Dagan, H. T. Dang, D. Giampiccolo, and B. Magnini (2009). The Fifth PASCAL Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge. In Proceedings of TAC 2009 Workshop, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
[3]
Budanitsky, A. and G. Hirst (2006). Evaluating WordNet-based Measures of Lexical Semantic Relatedness. Computational Linguistics 32(1), 13--47.
[4]
Casati, R. and A. Varzi (1999). Parts and Places - The Structures of Spatial Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[5]
Clark, P., P. Harrison, T. Jenkins, J. Thompson, and R. Wojcik (2006). From WordNet to a Knowlege Base. In C. Baral (Ed.), Formalizing and Compiling Background Knowledge and Its Applications to Knowledge Representation and Question Answering. Papers from the 2006 AAAI Spring Symposium, pp. 10--15. AAAI Press.
[6]
Fellbaum, C. (Ed.) (1998). WordNet. An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
[7]
Gangemi, A., N. Guarino, C. Masolo, and A. Oltramari (2003). Sweetening WordNet with DOLCE. AI Magazine 24(3), 13--24.
[8]
Girju, R. and A. Badulescu (2006). Automatic Discovery of Part-Whole Relations. Computational Linguistics 32(1), 83--135.
[9]
Girju, R., V. Nastase, and P. Turney (2007). SemEval-2007 Task 04: Classification of Semantic Relations between Nominals. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval-2007), pp. 13--18. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[10]
Guarino, N. (1998). Some ontological principles for designing upper level lexical resources. In A. Rubio, N. Gallardo, R. Castro, and A. Tejada (Eds.), First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 527--534. European Language Resources Association.
[11]
Guarino, N. and C. Welty (2004). An overview of OntoClean. In S. Staab and R. Studer (Eds.), Handbook on Ontologies, pp. 151--159. Springer-Verlag.
[12]
Kaplan, A. N. and L. K. Schubert (2001). Measuring and Improving the Quality of World Knowledge Extracted From WordNet. Technical Report 751, University of Rochester.
[13]
Masolo, C., S. Borgo, A. Gangemi, N. Guarino, and A. Oltramari (2003). The WonderWeb library of foundational ontologies and the DOLCE ontology. WonderWeb (EU IST project 2001-33052) deliverable D18, LOA-ISTC-CNR.
[14]
Masolo, C., L. Vieu, E. Bottazzi, C. Catenacci, R. Ferrario, A. Gangemi, and N. Guarino (2004). Social roles and their descriptions. In D. Dubois and C. Welty (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2004), pp. 267--277. Menlo Park (CA): AAAI Press. Whistler June, 2--5, 2004.
[15]
Neel, A. and M. Garzon (2010). Semantic Methods for Textual Entailment: How Much World Knowledge is Enough? In Proceedings of FLAIRS 2010, pp. 253--258.
[16]
Oltramari, A., G. Vetere, M. Lenzerini, A. Gangemi, and N. Guarino (2010). Senso comune. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, S. Piperidis, M. Rosner, and D. Tapias (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'10), Valletta, Malta, pp. 3873--3877. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
[17]
Pease, A. and C. Fellbaum (2009). Formal ontology as interlingua: the SUMO and WordNet linking project and Global WordNet. In C.-R. Huang, N. Calzolari, A. Gangemi, A. Lenci, A. Oltramari, and L. Prévot (Eds.), Ontology and the Lexicon. A Natural Language Processing Perspective, pp. 31--45. Cambridge University Press.
[18]
Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The generative lexicon. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
[19]
Simons, P. (1987). Parts - A study in ontology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[20]
Thomasson, A. (1999). Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press.
[21]
Vieu, L. and M. Aurnague (2007). Part-of relations, functionality and dependence. In M. Aurnague, M. Hickmann, and L. Vieu (Eds.), The Categorization of Spatial Entities in Language and Cognition, pp. 307--336. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[22]
Winston, M., R. Chaffin, and D. Herrmann (1987). A taxonomy of part-whole relations. Cognitive Science 11(4), 417--444.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
IWCS '11: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computational Semantics
January 2011
408 pages

Publisher

Association for Computational Linguistics

United States

Publication History

Published: 12 January 2011

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 124
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 18 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media