Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/2022115.2022130guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

Recovering object-oriented framework for software product line reengineering

Published: 13 June 2011 Publication History

Abstract

A large number of software product lines (SPL) in practice are not constructed from scratch, but reengineered from legacy variant products. In order to transfer legacy products to SPL core assets, reverse variability analysis should be involved to find commonality and differences among variant artifacts. In this paper we concentrate on the recovery of SPL framework which can be represented by an object-oriented design model with variation points. We propose a semi-automatic SPL framework recovery approach with the assumption that involved legacy products have similar designs and implementations. In this approach, we adopt a bottom-up process based on clone detection and context analysis to identify corresponding mappings among design elements in different products. Then we use a top-down process from class level to method level with some heuristic rules to determine the commonality/variability classification and the variability type for each design element. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of our approach, we conduct a case study on an industrial product line and present comprehensive analysis and discussions on the results.

References

[1]
Pohl, K., Metzger, A.: Variability management in software product line engineering. In: ICSE 2006, pp. 1049-1050. ACM, New York (2006).
[2]
Kolb, R., Muthig, D., Patzke, T., Yamauchi, K.: A case study in refactoring a legacy component for reuse in a product line. In: ICSM 2005, pp. 369-378. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005).
[3]
Lee, H., Choi, H., Kang, K.C., Kim, D., Lee, Z.: Experience report on using a domain model-based extractive approach to software product line asset development. In: Edwards, S.H., Kulczycki, G. (eds.) ICSR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5791, pp. 137-149. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).
[4]
Frenzel, P., Koschke, R., Breu, A.P.J., Angstmann, K.: Extending the reflexion method for consolidating software variants into product lines. In: WCRE 2007, pp. 160-169. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2007).
[5]
John, I.: Integrating legacy documentation assets into a product line. In: van der Linden, F.J. (ed.) PFE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2290, pp. 78-101. Springer, Heidelberg (2002).
[6]
Knodel, J., John, I., Ganesan, D., Pinzger, M., Usero, F., Arciniegas, J.L., Riva, C.: Asset recovery and their incorporation into product lines. In: WCRE 2005, pp. 120-132. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005).
[7]
Duszynski, S., Knodel, J., Naab, M., Hein, D., Schitter, C.: Variant comparison - A technique for visualizing software variants. In: WCRE 2008, pp. 229-233. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2008).
[8]
Fayad, M.E., Schmidt, D.C.: Object-oriented application frameworks. Communications of the ACM 40(10), 32-38 (1997).
[9]
Yang, Y.: A Software Product Line Oriented Development Model and Reverse Eliciting Domain Components. Doctoral Dissertation. Fudan University (2010) (in Chinese).
[10]
Basit, H.A., Jarzabek, S.: A Data Mining Approach for Detecting Higher-Level Clones in Software. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 35(4), 497-514 (2009).
[11]
Stoermer, C., O'Brien, L.: MAP - Mining Architectures for Product Line Evaluations. In: WICSA 2001, p. 35. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2001).
[12]
Smith, D.B., Brien, L.O., Bergey, J.: Using the Options Analysis for Reengineering (OAR) Method for Mining Components for a Product Line. In: Chastek, G.J. (ed.) SPLC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2379, pp. 316-327. Springer, Heidelberg (2002).
[13]
Murphy, G.C., Notkin, D., Sullivan, K.J.: Software Reflexion Models: Bridging the Gap between Design and Implementation. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 27(4), 364-380 (2001).
[14]
Bianchi, A., Caivano, D., Marengo, V., Visaggio, G.: Iterative reengineering of legacy systems. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 29(3), 225-241 (2003).
[15]
Nierstrasz, O., Kobel, M., Girba, T., Lanza, M., Bunke, H.: Example-driven reconstruction of software models. In: CSMR 2007, pp. 275-284. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2007).
[16]
Tahvildari, L.: Quality-driven object-oriented re-engineering framework. In: ICSM 2004, pp. 479-483. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2004).
[17]
Collard, M.L.: An infrastructure to support meta-differencing and refactoring of source code. In: ASE 2003, pp. 377-380. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2003).
[18]
Maletic, J.I., Collard, M.L.: Supporting source code difference analysis. In: 20th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, pp. 210-219. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2004).
[19]
Canfora, G., Cerulo, L., Penta, M.D.: Ldiff: An enhanced line differencing tool. In: 31st International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 595-598. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2009).

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)A mapping study of software architecture recovery for software product linesProceedings of the 12th European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Proceedings10.1145/3241403.3241454(1-7)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2018
  • (2017)Investigating the variability impact on the recovery of software product line architecturesProceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Software Components, Architectures, and Reuse10.1145/3132498.3133835(1-10)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2017

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
ICSR'11: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Top productivity through software reuse
June 2011
247 pages
ISBN:9783642213465
  • Editor:
  • Klaus Schmid

Sponsors

  • ISASE: International Society for the Advancement of Software Education
  • PUSAT: Pohang University of Science and Technology
  • SOFTWARE GENERATORS: Software Generators, LLC
  • CoSDEC

Publisher

Springer-Verlag

Berlin, Heidelberg

Publication History

Published: 13 June 2011

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)A mapping study of software architecture recovery for software product linesProceedings of the 12th European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Proceedings10.1145/3241403.3241454(1-7)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2018
  • (2017)Investigating the variability impact on the recovery of software product line architecturesProceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Software Components, Architectures, and Reuse10.1145/3132498.3133835(1-10)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2017

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media