Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/2146303.2146371guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesbcs-hciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free access

Towards the use of "negative effects" in technology design and evaluation

Published: 06 September 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Negative effects of computer use are reported in different studies; but so far no standardized framework exists to work with these issues throughout a user-centred design process. "Negative effects" are the result of user, context and task characteristics and they diminish the performance, the perceived ease of use or even prevent people from using technology. In this paper we discuss different aspects and ideas in order to debate "negative effects" as origin of design and as evaluation criteria. The high-level goal of this approach is to avoid negative effects by design. This paper describes a number of basic thoughts and considerations to describe the idea of how and why "negative effects" should be considered throughout the design process.

References

[1]
Aronson, E.; Wilson, T. D.; Akert, R. M.; 2004 Sozialpsychology, 4th edition, Pearson Education, Inc.
[2]
Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.
[3]
Beckers, J. J., Wicherts, J. M., and Schmidt, H. G. 2007. Computer Anxiety: "Trait" or "State"?. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23, 6 (Nov. 2007), 2851--2862.
[4]
Benford, S., Giannachi, G., Koleva, B., and Rodden, T. 2009. From interaction to trajectories: designing coherent journeys through user experiences. In Proceedings of the 27th international Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA, April 04 - 09, 2009). CHI '09. ACM, New York, NY, 709--718.
[5]
Bratteberg, Ingunn; Kristoffersen, Steinar; Irreversibility and Forceback in Public Interfaces. NordiCHI 2008, Lund, Sweden
[6]
Brosnan, M. (1999). The "Draw-A-Computer-User" test: a new methodology, an old story? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 3, 375--385.
[7]
Cockton, Gilbert (2009): Getting there: six meta-principles and interaction design. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2009 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2009. pp. 2223--2232.
[8]
Cockton, Gilbert, FEATURE Designing worth---connecting preferred means to desired ends (2008), in: interactions, 15:4 (54--57)
[9]
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319--340.
[10]
Deane, F., Henderson, R. D., Barrelle, K., Saliba, A., & Mahar, D. (1995a). Construct validity of computer anxiety as measured by the computer attitude scale. In Y. Anzai, K. Ogawa, & H. Mori (Eds.), Advances in human factors/ergonomics 20: A symbiosis of human and artefact (pp. 581--586). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
[11]
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., & Borning, A. (2006). Value Sensitive Design and information systems. In P. Zhang & D. Galletta (eds.), Human-computer interaction in management information systems: Foundations (pp. 348--372). Armonk, New York; London, England: M. E. Sharpe. Reprinted (2008) in K. E. Himma & H. T. Tavani (Eds.), The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics (pp. 69--101). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[12]
Heinssen, R. K., Glass, C. R., & Knight, L. A. (1987). Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 3, 49--59.
[13]
Ibister Katherine; Höök Kia; Sharp, Michael; Laaksolahti, Jarmo, The Sensual Evaluation Instrument: Developing an Affective Evaluation Tool; CHI'06; Montreal
[14]
Jay, T. (1981). Computerphobia. What to do about it. Educational Technology, 21, 47--48.
[15]
Klasnja, P., Consolvo, S., Jung, J., Greenstein, B. M., LeGrand, L., Powledge, P., and Wetherall, D. 2009. "When I am on Wi-Fi, I am fearless": privacy concerns & practices in everyday Wi-Fi use. Boston, MA, USA, April 04--09, 2009). CHI '09. ACM, New York, NY, 1993--2002.
[16]
Leitner, M., Subasi, Ö., Geven, A., H., Norman and Tscheligi, M., User requirement analysis for a railway ticketing portal with emphasis on semantic accessibility for older users, W4A2009, April 20--21, 2009, Madrid
[17]
Lera, Eva de, Garreta-Domingo, Muriel: Ten Emotion Heuristics: Guideline for assessing the User's Affective Dimension Easily and Cost Effectively; Proceedings of the 21st BCS HCI Group Conference, HCI 2007, Lancaster, 2007
[18]
Miller, Jessica; Friedman, Batya; Jancke, Gavin; Gill, Brian; Value Tension in Design: The Value Sensitive Design Development, and Appropriation of a Corporation's Groupware System; Group'07; Sansibel Island, Florida; USA, ACM, 2007
[19]
Picard, R. W., Daily, S. B. "Evaluating Affective Interactions: Alternatives to Asking What Users Feel," CHI Workshop on Evaluating Affective Interfaces: Innovative Approaches, April 2005, Portland, OR.
[20]
Ramsay, Judith, A Factor Analysis of User Cognition and Emotion; CHI '09. ACM, New York, NY, 1993
[21]
Rosen, L. D., & Maguire, P. (1990). Myths and realities of computerphobia: a meta-analysis. Anxiety Research, 3, 175--191.
[22]
Smith, B. and Caputi, P. (2007). Cognitive interference model of computer anxiety: Implications for computer-based assessment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23, 3 (May. 2007), 1481 1498.
[23]
Thorpe, S. J. and Brosnan, M. J. (2007). Does computer anxiety reach levels which conform to DSM IV criteria for specific phobia?. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23, 3 (May. 2007), 1258--1272.
[24]
Worthington, V. L., & Zhao, Y. (1999). Existential computer anxiety and changes in computer technology: What past research on computer anxiety has missed. Journal of Educational Computer Research, 20, 299--315.

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)A Survey of the Trajectories Conceptual FrameworkProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3025453.3026022(2091-2105)Online publication date: 2-May-2017

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings
BCS '10: Proceedings of the 24th BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference
September 2010
502 pages
ISBN:9781780171302

Publisher

BCS Learning & Development Ltd.

Swindon, United Kingdom

Publication History

Published: 06 September 2010

Author Tags

  1. design evaluation
  2. design methodology
  3. human values in design
  4. negative effects

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)64
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
Reflects downloads up to 02 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)A Survey of the Trajectories Conceptual FrameworkProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3025453.3026022(2091-2105)Online publication date: 2-May-2017

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media