Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
Using collaborative plans to model the intentional structure of discourse
Publisher:
  • Harvard University
  • Cambridge, MA
  • United States
Order Number:UMI Order No. GAX95-14804
Reflects downloads up to 14 Oct 2024Bibliometrics
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract

An agent's ability to understand an utterance depends upon its ability to relate that utterance to the preceding discourse. The agent must determine whether the utterance begins a new segment of the discourse, completes the current segment, or contributes to it. The intentional structure of the discourse, comprised of discourse segment purposes and their interrelationships, plays a central role in this process (Grosz and Sidner, 1986). In this thesis, we provide a computational model for recognizing intentional structure and utilizing it in discourse processing. The model specifies how an agent's beliefs about the intentions underlying a discourse affects and are affected by its subsequent discourse. We characterize this process for both interpretation and generation and then provide specific algorithms for modeling the interpretation process.The collaborative planning framework of SharedPlans (Lochbaum, Grosz, and Sidner, 1990; Grosz and Kraus, 1993) provides the basis for our model of intentional structure. Under this model, agents are taken to engage in discourses and segments of discourses for reasons that derive from the mental state requirements of action and collaboration. Each utterance of a discourse is understood in terms of its contribution to the SharedPlans in which the discourse participants are engaged. We demonstrate that this model satisfies the requirements of Grosz and Sidner's (1986) theory of discourse structure and also simplifies and extends previous plan-based approaches to dialogue understanding. The model has been implemented in a system that demonstrates the contextual role of intentional structure in both interpretation and generation.

Cited By

  1. Hadad M, Kraus S, Gal Y and Lin R (2019). Temporal Reasoning for a Collaborative Planning Agent in a Dynamic Environment, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 37:4, (331-379), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2003.
  2. Ortiz C and Grosz B (2019). Interpreting Information Requests in Context A Collaborative Web Interface for Distance Learning, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 5:4, (429-465), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2002.
  3. Carberry S and Lambert L (1999). A process model for recognizing communicative acts and modeling negotiation subdialogues, Computational Linguistics, 25:1, (1-53), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1999.
  4. Rich C and Sidner C (1998). COLLAGEN, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 8:3-4, (315-350), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1998.
  5. ACM
    Rich C and Sidner C Segmented interaction history in a collaborative interface agent Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, (23-30)
  6. ACM
    Rich C and Sidner C COLLAGEN Proceedings of the first international conference on Autonomous agents, (284-291)
  7. ACM
    Rich C and Sidner C Adding a collaborative agent to graphical user interfaces Proceedings of the 9th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, (21-30)
  8. Hirschberg J and Nakatani C A prosodic analysis of discourse segments in direction-giving monologues Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, (286-293)
  9. Rosé C, Di Eugenio B, Levin L and Van Ess-Dykema C Discourse processing of dialogues with multiple threads Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, (31-38)
  10. Grosz B, Weinstein S and Joshi A (1995). Centering, Computational Linguistics, 21:2, (203-225), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1995.
Contributors
  • Harvard University

Index Terms

  1. Using collaborative plans to model the intentional structure of discourse

    Recommendations