Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/2381255.2381275guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesConference Proceedingsacm-pubtype
Article

In the eye of the beholder - perception of indeterminate art

Published: 20 June 2007 Publication History

Abstract

How do we interpret an object - a scene - a painting? Perception research and art illuminate from different angles how the vast amount of information in our visually perceived environment is processed by the viewer to form a coherent and consistent interpretation of the world. Using drawings and paintings by the artist Robert Pepperell, this work attempts to connect these different world views. Pepperell's paintings at first glance seem to be a baroque fresco, an expressionist still-life, or a cubist collage; taking a closer look, however, this concrete interpretation vanishes and we are left with an indeterminate painting. Using psychophysical experiments and eye tracking measures, in this work we seek to illuminate the visual processing of information in Pepperell's paintings. More specifically, we will investigate how the pattern of fixations - the loci of interest - change as a function of the task ('What is depicted in this scene?' vs. 'Does this image contain people?') and of the image content. The interpretation of the experimental results in the context of perceptual research will give first insights into the perception of (indeterminate) art. Conversely, the results are also relevant for art, as they provide a kind of perceptual, measurable 'validation' of the artist's intentions.

References

[1]
BRAINARD D. H.: The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision 10, 4 (1997), 433-436.
[2]
BUSWELL G.: How people look at pictures: A study of the psychology of perception in art. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1935.
[3]
CHUA H. F., BOLAND J. E., NISBETT R. E.: Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences USA 102, 35 (Aug 2005), 12629-12633. Comparative Study.
[4]
GITELMAN D. R.: ILAB: a program for postexperimental eye movement analysis. Behavioral Research Methods Instruments Computers 34, 4 (Nov 2002), 605-612.
[5]
HAYHOE M. M., BALLARD D.: Eye movements in natural behavior. Trends Cogn Sci 9, 4 (Apr 2005), 188-194.
[6]
HAYHOE M. M., SHRIVASTAVA A., MRUCZEK R., PELZ J. B.: Visual memory and motor planning in a natural task. J. Vis. 3, 1 (2 2003), 49-63.
[7]
KRIEGER G., RENTSCHLER I., HAUSKE G., SCHILL K., ZETZSCHE C.: Object and scene analysis by saccadic eyemovements: an investigation with higher-order statistics. Spat Vis 13, 2-3 (2000), 201-214. Comparative Study.
[8]
LAND M., MENNIE N., RUSTED J.: The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. Perception 28, 11 (1999), 1311-1328.
[9]
LOCHER P. J.: The usefulness of eye movement recordings to subject an aesthetic episode with visual art to empirical scrutiny. Psychology Science 48 (2006).
[10]
LOCHER P. J.: Visual interest in pictorial art during an aesthetic episode. Spatial Vision (in press).
[11]
MOLNAR F.: Advances in Intrinsic Motivation and Aesthetics. Plenum Press, New York, 1981, ch. About the role of visual exploration in aesthetics, pp. 385-413.
[12]
NODINE C., LOCHER P., KRUPINSKI E.: The role of formal art training on the perception and aesthetic judgment of art compositions. Leonardo 26 (1993), 219-227.
[13]
PEPPERELL R.: Visual indeterminacy and the paradoxes of consciousness. In Proceedings of Altered States Conference (2005).
[14]
PEPPERELL R.: Seeing without objects: Visual indeterminacy and art. Leonardo 39 (2006).
[15]
RENNINGER L., VERGHESE P., COUGHLAN J.: Where to look next? Eye movements reduce local uncertainty. J. Vis. 7, 3 (2 2007), 1-17.
[16]
VOGEL J., SCHWANINGER A., WALLRAVEN C., BÜLTHOFF H. H.: Categorization of natural scenes: local vs. global information. In APGV '06: Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization (New York, NY, USA, 2006), ACM Press, pp. 33-40.
[17]
YARBUS A.: Eye movements and vision. Plenum Press, New York, 1967.

Cited By

View all
  • (2008)Perceptual and computational categories in artProceedings of the Fourth Eurographics conference on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging10.5555/2381333.2381355(131-138)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2008

Index Terms

  1. In the eye of the beholder - perception of indeterminate art

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Guide Proceedings
      Computational Aesthetics'07: Proceedings of the Third Eurographics conference on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging
      June 2007
      177 pages
      ISBN:9783905673432

      Sponsors

      • University of Victoria: University of Victoria
      • iLAB: interactions Lab, University of Calgary
      • i CORE: i CORE
      • UOC: University of Calgary
      • ACAD: Alberta College of Art & Design
      • EUROGRAPHICS: The European Association for Computer Graphics
      • Banff Centre: The Banff Centre inspiring creativity

      Publisher

      Eurographics Association

      Goslar, Germany

      Publication History

      Published: 20 June 2007

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 14 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2008)Perceptual and computational categories in artProceedings of the Fourth Eurographics conference on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging10.5555/2381333.2381355(131-138)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2008

      View Options

      View options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media