Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/2382029.2382032dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshltConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free access

Acoustic-prosodic entrainment and social behavior

Published: 03 June 2012 Publication History

Abstract

In conversation, speakers have been shown to entrain, or become more similar to each other, in various ways. We measure entrainment on eight acoustic features extracted from the speech of subjects playing a cooperative computer game and associate the degree of entrainment with a number of manually-labeled social variables acquired using Amazon Mechanical Turk, as well as objective measures of dialogue success. We find that male-female pairs entrain on all features, while male-male pairs entrain only on particular acoustic features (intensity mean, intensity maximum and syllables per second). We further determine that entrainment is more important to the perception of female-male social behavior than it is for same-gender pairs, and it is more important to the smoothness and flow of male-male dialogue than it is for female-female or mixed-gender pairs. Finally, we find that entrainment is more pronounced when intensity or speaking rate is especially high or low.

References

[1]
Amazon Mechanical Turk, http://www.mturk.com. Frances R. Bilous and Robert M. Krauss 1988. Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same- and mixed-gender dyads. Language and Communication, 8(3/4):183--194.
[2]
Susan E. Brennan and Herbert H. Clark. 1996. Conceptual Pacts and Lexical Choice in Conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22(6):1482--1493.
[3]
Tanya L. Chartrand and John A. Bargh. 1999. The Chameleon Effect: The Perception-Behavior Link and Social Interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6):893--910.
[4]
Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Michael Gamon, and Susan Dumais. 2011. Mark My Words! Linguistic Style Accommodation in Social Media. Proceedings of WWW 2011.
[5]
H. Giles and N. Coupland. 1991. Language: Contexts and Consequences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
[6]
Agustín Gravano. 2009. Turn-Taking and Affirmative Cue Words in Task-Oriented Dialogue. Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University, New York.
[7]
Agustín Gravano and Julia Hirschberg. 2011. Turn-taking cues in task-oriented dialogue. Computer Speech and Language, 25(3):601--634.
[8]
Agustín Gravano, Rivka Levitan, Laura Willson, Stefan Benus, Julia Hirschberg, Ani Nenkova. 2011. Acoustic and Prosodic Correlates of Social Behavior. Interspeech 2011.
[9]
Chi-Chun Lee, Matthew Black, Athanasios Katsamanis, Adam Lammert, Brian Baucom, Andrew Christensen, Panayiotis G. Georgiou, Shrikanth Narayanan. 2010. Quantification of Prosodic Entrainment in Affective Spontaneous Spoken Interactions of Married Couples. Eleventh Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association.
[10]
Rivka Levitan, Agustín Gravano, and Julia Hirschberg. 2011. Entrainment in Speech Preceding Backchannels. Proceedings of ACL/HLT 2011.
[11]
Rivka Levitan and Julia Hirschberg. 2011. Measuring acoustic-prosodic entrainment with respect to multiple levels and dimensions. Proceedings of Interspeech 2011.
[12]
Laura L. Namy, Lynne C. Nygaard, Denise Sauerteig. 2002. Gender differences in vocal accommodation: the role of perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(4):422--432.
[13]
Michael Natale. 1975. Convergence of Mean Vocal Intensity in Dyadic Communication as a Function of Social Desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5):790--804.
[14]
Ani Nenkova, Agustín Gravano, and Julia Hirschberg. 2008. High-frequency word entrainment in spoken dialogue. Proceedings of ACL/HLT 2008.
[15]
Kate G. Niederhoffer and James W. Pennebaker. 2002. Linguistic style matching in social interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(4):337--360.
[16]
Jennifer S. Pardo. 2006. On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(4):2382--2393.
[17]
David Reitter, Johanna D. Moore, and Frank Keller. 1996. Priming of Syntactic Rules in Task-Oriented Dialogue and Spontaneous Conversation. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
[18]
Kim Silverman, Mary Beckman, John Pitrelli, Mori Ostendorf, Colin Wightman, Patti Price, Janet Pierrehumbert, Julia Hirschberg. 1992. TOBI: A Standard for Labeling English Prosody. ICSLP-1992, 867--870.
[19]
Linda Tickle-Degnen and Robert Rosenthal. 1990. The Nature of Rapport and its Nonverbal Correlates. Psychological Inquiry, 1(4):285--293.
[20]
Richard West & Lynn Turner. 2009. Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis and Application. McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages, 4th edition.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Can VUI Turn-Taking Entrain User Behaviours?Proceedings of the 13th Indian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3570211.3570215(42-56)Online publication date: 9-Nov-2022
  • (2022)Effects of Emotional Expressiveness on Voice Chatbot InteractionsProceedings of the 4th Conference on Conversational User Interfaces10.1145/3543829.3543840(1-11)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2022
  • (2022)Applied Affective ComputingundefinedOnline publication date: 25-Jan-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
NAACL HLT '12: Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
June 2012
840 pages
ISBN:9781937284206

Publisher

Association for Computational Linguistics

United States

Publication History

Published: 03 June 2012

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 240 of 768 submissions, 31%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)43
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Can VUI Turn-Taking Entrain User Behaviours?Proceedings of the 13th Indian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3570211.3570215(42-56)Online publication date: 9-Nov-2022
  • (2022)Effects of Emotional Expressiveness on Voice Chatbot InteractionsProceedings of the 4th Conference on Conversational User Interfaces10.1145/3543829.3543840(1-11)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2022
  • (2022)Applied Affective ComputingundefinedOnline publication date: 25-Jan-2022
  • (2019)I Say, You Say, We SayProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/33592963:CSCW(1-19)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2019
  • (2018)Multimodal Modeling of Coordination and Coregulation Patterns in Speech Rate during Triadic Collaborative Problem SolvingProceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction10.1145/3242969.3242989(21-30)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2018
  • (2016)Body movements and laughter recognitionProceedings of the Workshop on Multimodal Analyses enabling Artificial Agents in Human-Machine Interaction10.1145/3011263.3011264(20-24)Online publication date: 12-Nov-2016
  • (2014)Acoustic-Prosodic Entrainment and Rapport in Collaborative Learning DialoguesProceedings of the 2014 ACM workshop on Multimodal Learning Analytics Workshop and Grand Challenge10.1145/2666633.2666635(5-12)Online publication date: 12-Nov-2014

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media