Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/2857070.2857165dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesasistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Deterring the spread of misinformation on social network sites: a social cognitive theory-guided intervention

Published: 06 November 2015 Publication History

Abstract

As more individuals turn to social network sites (SNSs) for information, the spread of misinformation in these sites is becoming a greater concern. Not only can misinformation cause individual users anxiety and harm, but it can also prevent SNSs from realizing their full potential as trustworthy sources of information. This study proposed and tested an intervention-based strategy that was designed to discourage behavior that promotes the spread of misinformation. Guided by the social cognitive theory (SCT), the intervention sought to modify users' outcome expectations by presenting them with a message that highlighted the negative consequences of misinformation. To investigate the effectiveness of this intervention message, a classical experiment was conducted on-line with 131 college-student participants. In the study's experimental group, the ANOVA results showed that the intervention effectively reduced the total number of "Likes" and "Shares" for postings that provided misinformation. Future development and testing of this SCT-guided, outcome-expectations-based intervention is promising.

References

[1]
Abraham, C., & Michie, S. (2008). A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychology, 27(3), 379.
[2]
Ashford, S., Edmunds, J., & French, D. P. (2010). What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(2), 265--288.
[3]
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[4]
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
[5]
Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior, 31(2), 143--164.
[6]
Budak, C., Agrawal, D., & Abbadi, A. E. (2011). Limiting the spread of misinformation in social networks. Proceedings of the 20th International World Wide Web Conference, 665--674.
[7]
Calvert, P. J. (2001). Scholarly misconduct and misinformation on the World Wide Web. Electronic Library, 19(4), 232--240.
[8]
Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., & Poblete, B. (2011). Information credibility on Twitter. Proceedings of the 20th International World Wide Web Conference, 675--684.
[9]
Chen, X., & Sin, S.-C. J. (2013). 'Misinformation? What of it?' Motivations and individual differences in misinformation sharing on social media. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(1), 1--4.
[10]
Doerr, B., Fouz, M., & Friedrich, T. (2012). Why rumors spread so quickly in social networks. Communications of the ACM, 55(6), 70.
[11]
Ellison, N. B., & boyd, d. m. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies (pp. 151--172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[12]
Ennals, R., Trushkowsky, B., & Agosta, J. M. (2010). Highlighting disputed claims on the web. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, 341--350.
[13]
Fitzgerald, M. A. (1997). Misinformation on the Internet: Applying evaluation skills to online information. Emergency Librarian, 24(3), 9--14.
[14]
Floridi, L. (1996). Brave.Net.World: The Internet as a disinformation superhighway? Electronic Library, 14(6), 509--514.
[15]
Karlova, N. A., & Fisher, K. E. (2013). A social diffusion model of misinformation and disinformation for understanding human information behaviour. Information Research, 18 (1).
[16]
Kim, K.-S., Sin, S.-C. J., & Yoo-Lee, E. (2013). Undergraduates' use of social media as information sources. College & Research Libraries, 75(4), 442--457.
[17]
Li, H., & Sakamoto, Y. (2014). Social impacts in social media: An examination of perceived truthfulness and sharing of information. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 278--287.
[18]
Mendoza, M., Poblete, B., & Castillo, C. (2010). Twitter under crisis: Can we trust what we RT? Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics, 71--79.
[19]
Starbird, K., Maddock, J., Orand, M., Achterman, P., & Mason, R. M. (2014). Rumors, false flags, and digital vigilantes: Misinformation on Twitter after the 2013 Boston marathon bombing. Proceedings of the iConference 2014.
[20]
Tanaka, Y., Sakamoto, Y., & Matsuka, T. (2013). Toward a social-technological system that inactivates false rumors through the critical thinking of crowds. Proceedings of the 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 649--658.
[21]
Walsh, J. (2010). Librarians and controlling disinformation: Is multi-literacy instruction the answer? Library Review, 59(7), 498--511.
[22]
Williams, S., & French, D. (2011). What are the most effective intervention techniques for changing physical activity self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour - and are they the same? Health Education Research, 26(2), 308--322.
[23]
Wilson, T. D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249--270.
[24]
World Economic Forum. (2014). Top 10 trends of 2014: 10. The rapid spread of misinformation online. from http://bit.ly/1edZQQF
[25]
Zhou, L., & Zhang, D. (2007). An ontology-supported misinformation model: Toward a digital misinformation library. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 37(5), 804--813.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Online Misinformation SpreadProceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Information System and Data Mining10.1145/3325917.3325938(171-178)Online publication date: 6-Apr-2019
  • (2016)Reviewing the landscape of research on the threats to the quality of user-generated contentProceedings of the 79th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Creating Knowledge, Enhancing Lives through Information & Technology10.5555/3017447.3017524(1-9)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2016

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
ASIST '15: Proceedings of the 78th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Information Science with Impact: Research in and for the Community
November 2015
812 pages
ISBN:087715547X

Publisher

American Society for Information Science

United States

Publication History

Published: 06 November 2015

Author Tags

  1. information behavior
  2. social media

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ASIST '15
ASIST '15: Research in and for the Community
November 6 - 10, 2015
Missouri, St. Louis

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 135 of 277 submissions, 49%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 12 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Online Misinformation SpreadProceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Information System and Data Mining10.1145/3325917.3325938(171-178)Online publication date: 6-Apr-2019
  • (2016)Reviewing the landscape of research on the threats to the quality of user-generated contentProceedings of the 79th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Creating Knowledge, Enhancing Lives through Information & Technology10.5555/3017447.3017524(1-9)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2016

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media