Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/2906831.2906895acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Integrating Roboticist Values into a Value Sensitive Design Framework for Humanoid Robots

Published: 07 March 2016 Publication History

Abstract

A good body of work in HRI has investigated how to design humanoids to effectively serve users' needs. This user centered approach has proved fruitful, but there exists relatively little work examining the intent and values of the roboticists themselves. Furthermore, we know little of how the values of roboticists influence their own designs. Such knowledge could help designers better reflect on whether their designs effectively convey particular ethics to their users. In this study, we analyzed 27 interviews of pioneer humanoid roboticists, seeking to identify the values of such roboticists. Our results suggest that roboticists' values are shaped by a dominant engineering-based background that emphasizes robotics as a field of integration (especially humanoids). Roboticists also see robots as testbeds for learning about humans themselves. We advocate a VSD approach for humanoids that goes beyond engineering disciplines and forces values to the forefront of discussion.

References

[1]
A.Sauppé and B. Mutlu. "The Social Impact of a Robot Co-Worker in Industrial Settings." In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3613--3622. ACM, 2015.
[2]
M.Salem and K. Dautenhahn. "Evaluating Trust and Safety in HRI: Practical Issues and Ethical Challenges." in Emerging Policy and Ethics of Human-Robot Interaction : A Workshop at 10th ACM/IEEE Int Conf on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2015).
[3]
B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, R. Te Boekhorst, and A. Billard. "Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills?." Universal Access in the Information Society 4, no. 2 (2005): 105--120.
[4]
E. Broadbent, R. Stafford, and B. MacDonald. "Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: Review and future directions." International Journal of Social Robotics 1, no. 4 (2009): 319--330.
[5]
E.G. Wilson. The melancholy android: on the psychology of sacred machines. SUNY Press, 2012.
[6]
P.H. Kahn Jr, T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro, N.G. Freier, R. L. Severson, B.T. Gill, J.H. Ruckert, and S. Shen. "Robovie, you'll have to go into the closet now?: Children's social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot." Developmental psychology 48, no. 2 (2012): 303.
[7]
D.S. Syrdal, K. Dautenhahn, M.L. Walters, and K.L. Koay. "Sharing Spaces with Robots in a Home Scenario-Anthropomorphic Attributions and their Effect on Proxemic Expectations and Evaluations in a Live HRI Trial." In AAAI Fall Symposium: AI in Eldercare: New Solutions to Old Problems, pp. 116--123. 2008.
[8]
A. Austermann, S. Yamada, K. Funakoshi, and M. Nakano. "How do users interact with a pet-robot and a humanoid." In CHI'10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3727--3732. ACM, 2010.
[9]
W. Wallach and C. Allen. Moral machines: Teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford University Press, 2008. pp.39
[10]
G. Shaw-Garlock. "Looking forward to sociable robots." International Journal of Social Robotics 1, no. 3 (2009): 249--260.
[11]
K. Richardson. An Anthropology of Robots and AI: Annihilation Anxiety and Machines. Routledge, 2015.
[12]
B. Friedman, P.H. Kahn Jr, A. Borning, and A. Huldtgren. "Value sensitive design and information systems." In Early engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory, pp. 55--95. Springer Netherlands, 2013.
[13]
C.F.DiSalvo, F. Gemperle, J. Forlizzi, and S. Kiesler. "All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads." In Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, pp. 321--326. ACM, 2002.
[14]
C. Breazeal, A. Edsinger, P. Fitzpatrick, and B. Scassellati. "Active vision for sociable robots." Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on 31, no. 5 (2001): 443--453.
[15]
P. J. Hinds, T. L. Roberts, and H. Jones. "Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task." Human-Computer Interaction 19, no. 1 (2004): 151--181.
[16]
B. Mutlu, S. Osman, J. Forlizzi, J. Hodgins, and S. Kiesler. "Perceptions of ASIMO: an exploration on co-operation and competition with humans and humanoid robots." In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction, pp. 351--352. ACM, 2006.
[17]
M. Heerink, B. Kröse, B. Wielinga, and V. Evers. "Enjoyment intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people." In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction, pp. 113--120. ACM, 2008.
[18]
D.C. Scherer. "Movie Magic Makes Better Social Robots: The Overlap of Special Effects and Character Robot Engineering." Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 3, no. 1 (2014): 123--141.
[19]
A. Sauppé and B. Mutlu. "Design patterns for exploring and prototyping human-robot interactions." In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1439--1448. ACM, 2014.
[20]
H.R. Lee, S. Šabanovic, and E. Stolterman. "Stay on the boundary: artifact analysis exploring researcher and user framing of robot design." In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1471--1474. ACM, 2014.
[21]
M.Salem and K. Dautenhahn. "Evaluating Trust and Safety in HRI: Practical Issues and Ethical Challenges." in Emerging Policy and Ethics of Human-Robot Interaction : A Workshop at 10th ACM/IEEE Int Conf on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2015).
[22]
A.Weiss, J. Igelsböck, D. Wurhofer, and M. Tscheligi. "Looking forward to a "robotic society"?." International Journal of Social Robotics 3, no. 2 (2011): 111--123.
[23]
B.R. Duffy. "Anthropomorphism and the social robot." Robotics and autonomous systems 42, no. 3 (2003): 177--190.
[24]
J.P. Sullins. "Friends by design: A design philosophy for personal robotics technology." In Philosophy and Design, pp. 143--157. Springer Netherlands, 2008.
[25]
L.E. Holmquist and J. Forlizzi. "Introduction to Journal of Human-Robot Interaction Special Issue on Design." Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 3, no. 1 (2014): 1--3.
[26]
I. Oosterlaken. "Design for development: A capability approach." Design Issues 25, no. 4 (2009): 91--102.
[27]
D. Fallman. "The new good: exploring the potential of philosophy of technology to contribute to human-computer interaction." In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1051--1060. ACM, 2011.
[28]
B. Friedman and P.H. Kahn Jr. "Human values, ethics, and design." In The human-computer interaction handbook, pp. 1177--1201. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., 2002.
[29]
A. van Wynsberghe. "Designing robots for care: Care centered value-sensitive design." Science and engineering ethics 19, no. 2 (2013): 407--433.
[30]
M. Flanagan, D.C. Howe, and H. Nissenbaum. "Embodying values in technology: Theory and practice." Information technology and moral philosophy (2008): 322--353.
[31]
M. Flanagan, D. C. Howe, and H. Nissenbaum. "Values at play: Design tradeoffs in socially-oriented game design." In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 751--760. ACM, 2005.
[32]
P.Sengers, K. Boehner, S. David, and JJ. Kaye. "Reflective design." In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility, pp. 49--58. ACM, 2005.
[33]
P. Agre. "Toward a critical technical practice: Lessons learned in trying to reform AI." Bridging the Great Divide: Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum (1997): 131--157.
[34]
S.Sabanovic, S. Milojevic, P. Asaro, and M. Francisco. "Robotics Narratives and Networks [History]." Robotics & Automation Magazine, IEEE 22, no. 1 (2015): 137--146. & Online EEE History Center archive: [Online]. Available: http://www.ieeeghn.org/ wiki/index.php/Oral-History:Robotics_History:_ Narratives_and_Networks
[35]
I.Van de Poel. "Values in engineering design." (2009). In Anthonie W. M. Meijers (ed.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. 973--1
[36]
S.D. Niu, S. McCrickard, and S. Harrison. "Exploring humanoid factors of robots through transparent and reflective interactions." In Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), 2015 International Conference on, pp. 47--54. IEEE, 2015.
[37]
V. Braun and V. Clarke. "Using thematic analysis in psychology." Qualitative research in psychology 3, no. 2 (2006): 77--101.
[38]
Jean-Paul Laumond, an oral history conducted in 2011 by Selma Šabanović with Matthew R. Francisco, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, for Indiana University and the IEEE.
[39]
Ronald Arkin, an oral history conducted in 2014 by Peter Asaro, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, for Indiana University and the IEEE.
[40]
Herman Bruyninckx, an oral history conducted in 2011 by Peter Asaro, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, for Indiana University and the IEEE.
[41]
Norihiro Hagita, an oral history conducted in 2013 by Peter Asaro, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, for Indiana University and the IEEE.
[42]
Daniel Lee, an oral history conducted in 2014 by Peter Asaro, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, for Indiana University and the IEEE
[43]
Ruzena Bajcsy, an oral history conducted in 2010 by Peter Asaro with Selma Šabanović, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, for Indiana University and the IEEE.
[44]
Shigeo Hirose, an oral history conducted in 2011 by Selma Šabanović with Matthew R. Francisco, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, for Indiana University and the IEEE.
[45]
Jun Ho Oh, an oral history conducted in 2012 by Peter Asaro and Selma Sabanovic, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, for Indiana University and the IEEE.
[46]
Bob McGhee, an oral history conducted in 2010 by Peter Asaro with Selma Šabanović, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, for Indiana University and the IEEE.
[47]
Hiroshi Ishiguro, an oral history conducted in 2012 by Peter Asaro and Selma Sabanovic, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, for Indiana University and the IEEE.
[48]
Hirochika Inoue, an oral history conducted in 2011 by Selma Šabanović with Matthew R. Francisco, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, for Indiana University and the IEEE.
[49]
Oussama Khatib, an oral history conducted in 2013 by Peter Asaro, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, for Indiana University and the IEEE.
[50]
Illah Nourbakhsh, an oral history conducted in 2010 by Peter Asaro with Selma Sabanovic, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, for Indiana University and the IEEE.
[51]
Norm Caplan, an oral history conducted in 2012 by Peter Asaro with Selma Šabanović, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, for Indiana University and the IEEE.
[52]
Shigeki Sugano, an oral history conducted in 2014 by Peter Asaro, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, for Indiana University and the IEEE.
[53]
Gerd Hirzinger, an oral history conducted in 2011 by Peter Asaro, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, for Indiana University and the IEEE.
[54]
Luc Steels, an oral history conducted in 2011 by Peter Asaro, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, for Indiana University and the IEEE.
[55]
Francesco Mondada, an oral history conducted in 2011 by Peter Asaro, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, for Indiana University and the IEEE.
[56]
K. Shilton, J. A. Koepfler, and K. R. Fleischmann. "How to see values in social computing: methods for studying values dimensions." In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, pp. 426--435. ACM, 2014. pp.430
[57]
S. Šabanović, WL. Chang, C.C. Bennett, J.A. Piatt, and D. Hakken. "A robot of my own: participatory design of socially assistive robots for independently living older adults diagnosed with depression." In Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design for Aging, pp. 104--114. Springer International Publishing, 2015.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Futuristic AutobiographiesProceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3171221.3171244(388-397)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2018
  • (2017)Configuring the UserProceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/2998181.2998329(191-206)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2017
  • (2017)Steps Toward Participatory Design of Social RobotsProceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/2909824.3020237(244-253)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2017

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HRI '16: The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction
March 2016
676 pages
ISBN:9781467383707

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

  • AAAI: American Association for Artificial Intelligence
  • Human Factors & Ergonomics Soc: Human Factors & Ergonomics Soc

Publisher

IEEE Press

Publication History

Published: 07 March 2016

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. critical hri
  2. hri design
  3. humanoid
  4. roboticists
  5. value-sensitive design (vsd)

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

HRI '16
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

HRI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 45 of 181 submissions, 25%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

HRI '25
ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
March 4 - 6, 2025
Melbourne , VIC , Australia

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Futuristic AutobiographiesProceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3171221.3171244(388-397)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2018
  • (2017)Configuring the UserProceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/2998181.2998329(191-206)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2017
  • (2017)Steps Toward Participatory Design of Social RobotsProceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/2909824.3020237(244-253)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2017

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media